How to Blow Up a Novel: Pipeline Insurgency and Narrative Form in Alexis Wright’s Carpentaria

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1080/00111619.2023.2244876
Heather Ray Milligan
{"title":"How to Blow Up a Novel: Pipeline Insurgency and Narrative Form in Alexis Wright’s <i>Carpentaria</i>","authors":"Heather Ray Milligan","doi":"10.1080/00111619.2023.2244876","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With this article, I explore the insurgent aesthetic embedded in Alexis Wright’s 2006 novel Carpentaria. Building upon recent scholarship on forms, infrastructuralism, Indigenous aesthetics, and grounded normativity, I demonstrate how contemporary fiction can expose the contradictions inherent to infrastructure and reveal the inseparability of material and narrative forms. While thematically concerned with the destruction of fossil-capitalist infrastructure and the repurposing of wreckage, Wright also adapts the literary forms of the settler state and reconstitutes them into an anti-colonial Waanyi epic infused with ethics of Indigenous sovereignty and environmental defense. In doing so, she models a capacious narrative form capable of holding together heterogenous accounts of Land attentive to the relations of humans, animals, spirits, and claypans in the Gulf country. In an ecocritical contribution to literary and infrastructural studies, I propose an expansive understanding of form that includes not only aesthetic and sociopolitical arrangements, but nonhuman lifeways, migrations, and interdependencies, too: in other words, ecological infrastructures.","PeriodicalId":44131,"journal":{"name":"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2023.2244876","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With this article, I explore the insurgent aesthetic embedded in Alexis Wright’s 2006 novel Carpentaria. Building upon recent scholarship on forms, infrastructuralism, Indigenous aesthetics, and grounded normativity, I demonstrate how contemporary fiction can expose the contradictions inherent to infrastructure and reveal the inseparability of material and narrative forms. While thematically concerned with the destruction of fossil-capitalist infrastructure and the repurposing of wreckage, Wright also adapts the literary forms of the settler state and reconstitutes them into an anti-colonial Waanyi epic infused with ethics of Indigenous sovereignty and environmental defense. In doing so, she models a capacious narrative form capable of holding together heterogenous accounts of Land attentive to the relations of humans, animals, spirits, and claypans in the Gulf country. In an ecocritical contribution to literary and infrastructural studies, I propose an expansive understanding of form that includes not only aesthetic and sociopolitical arrangements, but nonhuman lifeways, migrations, and interdependencies, too: in other words, ecological infrastructures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
如何引爆一部小说:亚历克西斯·赖特《卡奔塔利亚》中的管道叛乱与叙事形式
在这篇文章中,我探索了亚历克西斯·赖特2006年的小说《卡奔塔利亚》中蕴含的反叛美学。基于最近关于形式、基础设施主义、本土美学和基础规范的学术研究,我展示了当代小说如何揭示基础设施固有的矛盾,并揭示了材料和叙事形式的不可分割性。在主题上关注化石资本主义基础设施的破坏和残骸的重新利用的同时,赖特也改编了移民国家的文学形式,并将其重建为一部反殖民的瓦伊史诗,其中注入了土著主权和环境保护的伦理。在这样做的过程中,她塑造了一种广阔的叙事形式,能够将不同的土地叙述结合在一起,关注海湾国家人类、动物、精神和粘土的关系。在对文学和基础设施研究的生态批评贡献中,我提出了一种对形式的广泛理解,不仅包括美学和社会政治安排,还包括非人类的生活方式、迁徙和相互依赖:换句话说,生态基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Since its inception in the 1950s, Critique has consistently identified the most notable novelists of our time. In the pages of Critique appeared the first authoritative discussions of Bellow and Malamud in the ''50s, Barth and Hawkes in the ''60s, Pynchon, Elkin, Vonnegut, and Coover in the ''70s; DeLillo, Atwood, Morrison, and García Márquez in the ''80s; Auster, Amy Tan, David Foster Wallace, and Nurrudin Farah in the ''90s; and Lorrie Moore and Mark Danielewski in the new century. Readers go to Critique for critical essays on new authors with emerging reputations, but the general focus of the journal is fiction after 1950 from any country. Critique is published five times a year.
期刊最新文献
Metabibliographic Fiction: Metafiction After the Death of the Book in Steven Hall’s Maxwell’s Demon and Nicola Barker’s I Am Sovereign ’’I’m a Woman. Man, Woman, M–Woman.’’ – Identity, Sexuality, and the Body in the Short Fiction of Malika Moustadraf Driving While Brown: The American Road Trip in H.M. Naqvi’s Home Boy “A Look at the Gaze in Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings” Frontier Stories: Burnt Shadows and an Alternative Ethic of Narrativizing Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1