The hybrid work of public sector data scientists

IF 2 Q3 MANAGEMENT Journal of Professions and Organization Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1093/jpo/joad017
Lukas Lorenz
{"title":"The hybrid work of public sector data scientists","authors":"Lukas Lorenz","doi":"10.1093/jpo/joad017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract As algorithms play an increasingly important role in public organizations, we see a rise in the number of public sector data scientists. Even though the relevance and risks of algorithms in the public sector are broadly discussed, our current academic knowledge of public sector data scientists and their work is limited. To develop an understanding of their work practices, data scientists have been studied in two Dutch government organizations. In a core period of 5 months per organization, I conducted in-depth qualitative research into the work of the data scientists, their role in the organization, and their relationship with other actors at two regulatory agencies in the Netherlands. The analysis shows that data scientists integrate Silicon Valley and engineering, domain, as well as political–administrative logics in their work practices. Thus, the work of the data scientists is hybrid. However, even though the organizational contexts are very similar, hybrid work takes very different forms both across organizations and over time. This dynamic hybridity is linked to different algorithmization processes and outcomes in the two organizations. The results suggest that hybridity in public sector data scientists’ work should be adapted to organizational and technological aspects of transformation processes and aspired outcomes.","PeriodicalId":45650,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Professions and Organization","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Professions and Organization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/joad017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract As algorithms play an increasingly important role in public organizations, we see a rise in the number of public sector data scientists. Even though the relevance and risks of algorithms in the public sector are broadly discussed, our current academic knowledge of public sector data scientists and their work is limited. To develop an understanding of their work practices, data scientists have been studied in two Dutch government organizations. In a core period of 5 months per organization, I conducted in-depth qualitative research into the work of the data scientists, their role in the organization, and their relationship with other actors at two regulatory agencies in the Netherlands. The analysis shows that data scientists integrate Silicon Valley and engineering, domain, as well as political–administrative logics in their work practices. Thus, the work of the data scientists is hybrid. However, even though the organizational contexts are very similar, hybrid work takes very different forms both across organizations and over time. This dynamic hybridity is linked to different algorithmization processes and outcomes in the two organizations. The results suggest that hybridity in public sector data scientists’ work should be adapted to organizational and technological aspects of transformation processes and aspired outcomes.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共部门数据科学家的混合工作
随着算法在公共组织中发挥越来越重要的作用,我们看到公共部门数据科学家的数量在增加。尽管算法在公共部门的相关性和风险被广泛讨论,但我们目前对公共部门数据科学家及其工作的学术知识是有限的。为了更好地理解他们的工作实践,我们在两个荷兰政府组织中对数据科学家进行了研究。在每个组织5个月的核心时间里,我对数据科学家的工作、他们在组织中的角色以及他们与荷兰两个监管机构的其他参与者的关系进行了深入的定性研究。分析表明,数据科学家在他们的工作实践中整合了硅谷和工程,领域以及政治-行政逻辑。因此,数据科学家的工作是混合的。然而,即使组织环境非常相似,混合型工作在不同的组织和不同的时间采取了非常不同的形式。这种动态混合与两个组织中不同的算法过程和结果相关联。结果表明,公共部门数据科学家工作中的混合性应该适应转型过程和期望结果的组织和技术方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
36.40%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
The constellations of design: Architects’ practice modalities when working with embodied individuals and virtual collectives in later life facilities in the UK Elite lawyers in Türkiye: Educational capital, status hierarchies, and feminization The customer is always right? Corporate client influence and women’s attainment in large US law firms Discipline, caregiving, and identity work of frontline professionals: Talking about the acts of compliance and resistance in the everyday practices of social workers Intra-professional collaboration and organization of work among teachers: How entangled institutional logics shape connectivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1