Ultrasonographic comparative study between letrazole and clomiphene citrate on endometrial receptivity during induced ovulation

Hazem Mohamed, Khaled Slama, Samar Ali, Sobhy Mahmoud
{"title":"Ultrasonographic comparative study between letrazole and clomiphene citrate on endometrial receptivity during induced ovulation","authors":"Hazem Mohamed, Khaled Slama, Samar Ali, Sobhy Mahmoud","doi":"10.21608/bjas.2023.211905.1172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infertility is a prevalent concern affecting numerous couples worldwide, often caused by anovulation or irregular ovulation. Induced ovulation using pharmacological agents, such as letrozole and clomiphene citrate, is a commonly employed approach to enhance fertility. However, the impact of these medications on endometrial receptivity, a critical factor for successful implantation and pregnancy, remains an area of ongoing research. The primary goal of this research was to compare endometrial receptivity during induced ovulation by letrazole or clomiphene citrate. Methods: This study was prospective comparative research where 120 PCO and infertility more than 1-year women were included and divided into 2 groups: Group A (Clomid induction group) (odd numbers); Clomid was administered in 100 mg/day for 5 days dose starting from day 3 to day 7. In this group, 130 women were followed and only 60 women were included, and 70 women were excluded because either data loss or failed ovulation. Group B (Letrozole induction group) (even numbers); Letrozole was given in the dose of 5 mg/day for 5 days starting from day 3 to day 7. In this group, 90 women were followed, and 60 women were included, and 30 women were excluded because either data loss or failed ovulation. Results: The results demonstrate significant differences in endometrial thickness among the two groups. On the 11th day of the cycle, Group B exhibited a significantly higher endometrial thickness (9.82 ± 0.21 mm) compared to Group A (7.00 ± 0.21 mm) (T = -73.53, p < 0.0001). Similarly, at the stage of mature follicle (follicle > 18mm), Group B showed a significantly greater endometrial thickness (10.22 ± 0.20 mm) compared to Group A (7.49 ± 0.20 mm) (T = -73.49, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, even 7 days after ovulation, Group B maintained a significantly thicker endometrium (10.65 ± 0.22 mm) compared to Group A (7.81 ± 0.20 mm) (T = -74.33, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Letrozole induces a greater rise in endometrial thickness and conception rate than Clomiphene citrate in infertile PCOS women. Letrozole may enhance fertility by increasing endometrial receptivity relative to CC.","PeriodicalId":8745,"journal":{"name":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Benha Journal of Applied Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/bjas.2023.211905.1172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Infertility is a prevalent concern affecting numerous couples worldwide, often caused by anovulation or irregular ovulation. Induced ovulation using pharmacological agents, such as letrozole and clomiphene citrate, is a commonly employed approach to enhance fertility. However, the impact of these medications on endometrial receptivity, a critical factor for successful implantation and pregnancy, remains an area of ongoing research. The primary goal of this research was to compare endometrial receptivity during induced ovulation by letrazole or clomiphene citrate. Methods: This study was prospective comparative research where 120 PCO and infertility more than 1-year women were included and divided into 2 groups: Group A (Clomid induction group) (odd numbers); Clomid was administered in 100 mg/day for 5 days dose starting from day 3 to day 7. In this group, 130 women were followed and only 60 women were included, and 70 women were excluded because either data loss or failed ovulation. Group B (Letrozole induction group) (even numbers); Letrozole was given in the dose of 5 mg/day for 5 days starting from day 3 to day 7. In this group, 90 women were followed, and 60 women were included, and 30 women were excluded because either data loss or failed ovulation. Results: The results demonstrate significant differences in endometrial thickness among the two groups. On the 11th day of the cycle, Group B exhibited a significantly higher endometrial thickness (9.82 ± 0.21 mm) compared to Group A (7.00 ± 0.21 mm) (T = -73.53, p < 0.0001). Similarly, at the stage of mature follicle (follicle > 18mm), Group B showed a significantly greater endometrial thickness (10.22 ± 0.20 mm) compared to Group A (7.49 ± 0.20 mm) (T = -73.49, p < 0.0001). Furthermore, even 7 days after ovulation, Group B maintained a significantly thicker endometrium (10.65 ± 0.22 mm) compared to Group A (7.81 ± 0.20 mm) (T = -74.33, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Letrozole induces a greater rise in endometrial thickness and conception rate than Clomiphene citrate in infertile PCOS women. Letrozole may enhance fertility by increasing endometrial receptivity relative to CC.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来曲唑与枸橼酸克罗米芬对促排卵子宫内膜容受性的超声比较研究
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Study of Cardiac Injury In Post COVID Children Etiopathogenesis of Acne Vulgaris Effect of Paternalistic Leadership Educational Program For Head Nurses on Staff Nurses’ psychological Empowerment Quality of Life among Patients with Helicobacter Pylori Infection Enhancing Nursing Personnel- physicians' Communication and Collaboration: Its Effect on Nursing Productivity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1