Validation of a minimally-invasive method for sampling epithelial-associated microorganisms on the rumen wall

IF 2.1 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Frontiers in animal science Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.3389/fanim.2023.1270550
Madison T. Henniger, Troy N. Rowan, Jonathan E. Beever, Pierre-Yves Mulon, Joe S. Smith, Brynn H. Voy, Jim E. Wells, Larry A. Kuehn, Phillip R. Myer
{"title":"Validation of a minimally-invasive method for sampling epithelial-associated microorganisms on the rumen wall","authors":"Madison T. Henniger, Troy N. Rowan, Jonathan E. Beever, Pierre-Yves Mulon, Joe S. Smith, Brynn H. Voy, Jim E. Wells, Larry A. Kuehn, Phillip R. Myer","doi":"10.3389/fanim.2023.1270550","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rumen microbiome provides approximately 70% of the required energy for the host by converting low-quality feedstuffs into usable energy for ruminants. The energy produced by the microorganisms is subsequently absorbed through the rumen epithelium and used towards growth and energy maintenance. There is evidence that ruminal epimural microbes directly interact with the rumen epithelium, acting as an intermediary communicator between the rumen liquid fraction and the host. Epimural microbiota have been demonstrated to be distinct from the ruminal liquid microbiome and perform unique roles within the rumen environment. However, methods to sample epimural communities from the rumen wall are limited and typically invasive, requiring animal fistulation or harvesting. To characterize the epimural communities present on the rumen wall, a novel and minimally-invasive surgical method was developed to swab the epithelium of the ventral sac of the rumen. The objective of this study was to validate this sampling method by comparing epimural and liquid fraction bacterial communities. During a 70-day feeding trial, Angus steers ( n = 45) were sampled on day 35 using the novel surgery method and tubed on day 70 to sample rumen liquid content. Genomic DNA was used to generate amplicon libraries of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. There were no differences between alpha diversity indices when comparing rumen versus epimural bacterial communities ( P > 0.05). The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used to ordinate ASV counts, and then tested for differences between rumen and epimural communities using a PERMANOVA with 999 permutations ( P < 0.05). Differential abundances of bacterial communities were tested using ANCOM-BC and MaAsLin2, where significance was determined by Q < 0.05 and overlap between both analysis methods. Within the 91 taxa that differed in abundance, 451 ASVs were found to be different between sample types ( Q < 0.05). Unique ASVs associated with Prevotella , Succinivibrio , family-level Eubacterium , and family-level Succinivibrio were in greater abundance for the rumen epithelial-associated bacterial communities ( Q < 0.05). The results demonstrate that the novel method of sampling from the rumen wall can capture differences between epimural and ruminal fluid bacterial communities, thus facilitating studies investigating the interactions between epimural bacteria with the host.","PeriodicalId":73064,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in animal science","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in animal science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1270550","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rumen microbiome provides approximately 70% of the required energy for the host by converting low-quality feedstuffs into usable energy for ruminants. The energy produced by the microorganisms is subsequently absorbed through the rumen epithelium and used towards growth and energy maintenance. There is evidence that ruminal epimural microbes directly interact with the rumen epithelium, acting as an intermediary communicator between the rumen liquid fraction and the host. Epimural microbiota have been demonstrated to be distinct from the ruminal liquid microbiome and perform unique roles within the rumen environment. However, methods to sample epimural communities from the rumen wall are limited and typically invasive, requiring animal fistulation or harvesting. To characterize the epimural communities present on the rumen wall, a novel and minimally-invasive surgical method was developed to swab the epithelium of the ventral sac of the rumen. The objective of this study was to validate this sampling method by comparing epimural and liquid fraction bacterial communities. During a 70-day feeding trial, Angus steers ( n = 45) were sampled on day 35 using the novel surgery method and tubed on day 70 to sample rumen liquid content. Genomic DNA was used to generate amplicon libraries of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene. There were no differences between alpha diversity indices when comparing rumen versus epimural bacterial communities ( P > 0.05). The Bray-Curtis dissimilarity was used to ordinate ASV counts, and then tested for differences between rumen and epimural communities using a PERMANOVA with 999 permutations ( P < 0.05). Differential abundances of bacterial communities were tested using ANCOM-BC and MaAsLin2, where significance was determined by Q < 0.05 and overlap between both analysis methods. Within the 91 taxa that differed in abundance, 451 ASVs were found to be different between sample types ( Q < 0.05). Unique ASVs associated with Prevotella , Succinivibrio , family-level Eubacterium , and family-level Succinivibrio were in greater abundance for the rumen epithelial-associated bacterial communities ( Q < 0.05). The results demonstrate that the novel method of sampling from the rumen wall can capture differences between epimural and ruminal fluid bacterial communities, thus facilitating studies investigating the interactions between epimural bacteria with the host.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瘤胃壁上上皮相关微生物取样的微创方法的验证
瘤胃微生物群通过将低质量饲料转化为反刍动物可利用的能量,为宿主提供约70%的所需能量。微生物产生的能量随后通过瘤胃上皮吸收,用于生长和能量维持。有证据表明,瘤胃硬膜外微生物直接与瘤胃上皮相互作用,作为瘤胃液体部分与宿主之间的中间通讯媒介。硬膜外微生物群已被证明不同于瘤胃液体微生物群,并在瘤胃环境中发挥独特的作用。然而,从瘤胃壁上采集硬膜外群落的方法是有限的,而且通常是侵入性的,需要动物瘘管或采集。为了描述瘤胃壁上存在的硬膜外群落,我们开发了一种新颖的微创手术方法来擦拭瘤胃腹囊的上皮。本研究的目的是通过比较硬膜外和液体部分细菌群落来验证这种采样方法。在为期70天的饲养试验中,在第35天采用新型手术方法取样安格斯阉牛(n = 45),并在第70天进行管状取样以测定瘤胃液体含量。利用基因组DNA构建16S rRNA基因V4区扩增子文库。在比较瘤胃和硬膜外细菌群落时,α多样性指数没有差异(P >0.05)。采用Bray-Curtis差异来协调ASV计数,然后使用具有999个排列的PERMANOVA (P <0.05)。使用ANCOM-BC和MaAsLin2检测细菌群落的差异丰度,其中通过Q <0.05,两种分析方法有重叠。在91个丰度不同的分类群中,发现451个asv在样品类型之间存在差异(Q <0.05)。与普雷沃氏菌、琥珀酸弧菌、家族级真细菌和家族级琥珀酸弧菌相关的独特asv在瘤胃上皮相关细菌群落中丰度更高(Q <0.05)。结果表明,从瘤胃壁取样的新方法可以捕获硬膜外细菌和瘤胃液细菌群落的差异,从而促进研究硬膜外细菌与宿主之间的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arterial pCO2 prediction using saphenous pCO2 in healthy mechanically ventilated dogs A systematic review of genotype-by-climate interaction studies in cattle, pigs, and chicken Lucerne meal in the diet of indigenous chickens: a review Assessing body condition scores, weight gain dynamics, and fecal egg counts in feedlot and non-feedlot cattle within high throughput abattoirs of the Eastern Cape Province Comparative study between scan sampling behavioral observations and an automatic monitoring image system on a commercial fattening pig farm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1