Ideas of National Self-Determination and Sovereigntyin the Political-Philosophical Concepts of Maghakia Ormanyan and Levon Shant

Lilit Sarvazyan
{"title":"Ideas of National Self-Determination and Sovereigntyin the Political-Philosophical Concepts of Maghakia Ormanyan and Levon Shant","authors":"Lilit Sarvazyan","doi":"10.54503/2953-8165-2023.1(1)-33","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"XIX-XX century’s geopolitical realities, constitutional and national-liberation movements, and the change in Ottoman statelegal order became the historic-political basis of the politicalphilosophical constructs of the thinkers of that time. Due to the military and diplomatic policies of the superpowers Full or partial liberation of the people under the rule of the Ottoman Empire was conceived by the Armenian nation as a historic injustice against the Armenians and a violation of the principle of the legal equality of the nations. In the context of these realities, prominent political scientist-philosophers of that century Maghakia Ormanyan (1841-1918) and Levon Shant (1869-1951) argue for the fundamental ideas of civilizational identity, protection of historical rights, political self-determination, freedom of self-government of the Armenian nation, substantiate independence and national-state sovereignty as highest values.","PeriodicalId":497991,"journal":{"name":"The POLITNOMOS․ Journal of Political and Legal Studies","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The POLITNOMOS․ Journal of Political and Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54503/2953-8165-2023.1(1)-33","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

XIX-XX century’s geopolitical realities, constitutional and national-liberation movements, and the change in Ottoman statelegal order became the historic-political basis of the politicalphilosophical constructs of the thinkers of that time. Due to the military and diplomatic policies of the superpowers Full or partial liberation of the people under the rule of the Ottoman Empire was conceived by the Armenian nation as a historic injustice against the Armenians and a violation of the principle of the legal equality of the nations. In the context of these realities, prominent political scientist-philosophers of that century Maghakia Ormanyan (1841-1918) and Levon Shant (1869-1951) argue for the fundamental ideas of civilizational identity, protection of historical rights, political self-determination, freedom of self-government of the Armenian nation, substantiate independence and national-state sovereignty as highest values.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
奥马尼扬和尚特政治哲学观念中的民族自决和主权思想
十九至二十世纪的地缘政治现实、宪政和民族解放运动,以及奥斯曼帝国法律秩序的变化,成为当时思想家政治哲学建构的历史政治基础。由于超级大国的军事和外交政策,在奥斯曼帝国的统治下,亚美尼亚民族认为完全或部分解放人民是对亚美尼亚人的历史不公,违反了各国法律平等的原则。在这些现实的背景下,那个世纪杰出的政治科学家-哲学家Maghakia Ormanyan(1841-1918)和Levon Shant(1869-1951)主张亚美尼亚民族的文明认同、保护历史权利、政治自决、自治自由、将独立和民族国家主权作为最高价值的基本思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cyber-Security as the Most Important Component of National Security Peculiarities of the Commencement of Prescription Period in Obligatory Relations: International Standards and the Armenian Legislation Russian-Turkish Relations in the Context on Energy Cooperation Concept of Rights and Security of Nagorno-Karabakh People in Light of ICJ’s Advisory Opinion on Kosovo Role and Powers of the Non-Executive President in the Republic of Armenia: Unfinished Constitutional Transition from a Semi-Presidential System of Governance to the Armenian Parliamentary Democracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1