A meta‐analysis on peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption

IF 9.1 2区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS Psychology & Marketing Pub Date : 2023-10-13 DOI:10.1002/mar.21916
Md Ashaduzzaman, Scott Weaven, Mitchell Ross, Charles Jebarajakirthy, Jiraporn Surachartkumtonkun, Haroon Iqbal Maseeh
{"title":"A meta‐analysis on peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption","authors":"Md Ashaduzzaman, Scott Weaven, Mitchell Ross, Charles Jebarajakirthy, Jiraporn Surachartkumtonkun, Haroon Iqbal Maseeh","doi":"10.1002/mar.21916","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Peer‐to‐peer‐accommodation, a sharing economy‐based business model, enables using unutilized houses, apartments, and rooms of individuals to provide shared accommodation to tourists and travelers. On account of the importance of peer‐to‐peer accommodation, many studies have been conducted on factors/stimuli driving peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption; however, findings remain inconsistent and fragmented. Accordingly, using the stimulus‐organism‐response model, this meta‐analysis provides generalized findings on determinants driving peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption. Our meta‐analysis shows that stimuli (service characteristics, psychological aspects, social aspects, and technological aspects) drive the organism (perceived service quality) which in turn drives peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption. Further, our moderation analysis shows that the relationship between these stimuli and the organism, and the relationship between the organism and peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption, vary depending on four moderators: sample type, country of study, survey administration method, and sample size. Overall, this study contributes to the stimulus‐organism‐response theory by extending it to the meta‐analytical approach and suggesting a new organism for inclusion in the original stimulus‐organism‐response model. This meta‐analysis also contributes to the peer‐to‐peer accommodation and sharing economy literature and provides practical recommendations for accommodation platform providers and their listed houses to develop marketing strategy and policy.","PeriodicalId":48373,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Marketing","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21916","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Peer‐to‐peer‐accommodation, a sharing economy‐based business model, enables using unutilized houses, apartments, and rooms of individuals to provide shared accommodation to tourists and travelers. On account of the importance of peer‐to‐peer accommodation, many studies have been conducted on factors/stimuli driving peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption; however, findings remain inconsistent and fragmented. Accordingly, using the stimulus‐organism‐response model, this meta‐analysis provides generalized findings on determinants driving peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption. Our meta‐analysis shows that stimuli (service characteristics, psychological aspects, social aspects, and technological aspects) drive the organism (perceived service quality) which in turn drives peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption. Further, our moderation analysis shows that the relationship between these stimuli and the organism, and the relationship between the organism and peer‐to‐peer accommodation adoption, vary depending on four moderators: sample type, country of study, survey administration method, and sample size. Overall, this study contributes to the stimulus‐organism‐response theory by extending it to the meta‐analytical approach and suggesting a new organism for inclusion in the original stimulus‐organism‐response model. This meta‐analysis also contributes to the peer‐to‐peer accommodation and sharing economy literature and provides practical recommendations for accommodation platform providers and their listed houses to develop marketing strategy and policy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
点对点住宿采用的meta分析
点对点住宿是一种基于共享经济的商业模式,它可以利用闲置的房屋、公寓和个人房间为游客和旅行者提供共享住宿。考虑到对等住宿的重要性,许多研究都是关于推动对等住宿采用的因素/刺激的;然而,研究结果仍然不一致且支离破碎。因此,使用刺激-有机体-反应模型,本荟萃分析提供了驱动同伴间适应采用的决定因素的一般性发现。我们的元分析表明,刺激因素(服务特征、心理方面、社会方面和技术方面)驱动了机体(感知服务质量),进而推动了对等住宿的采用。此外,我们的调节分析表明,这些刺激与个体之间的关系,以及个体与同伴对同伴适应采用之间的关系,取决于四个调节因子:样本类型、研究国家、调查管理方法和样本量。总的来说,本研究通过将刺激-生物-反应理论扩展到元分析方法,并提出了一个新的生物纳入原始的刺激-生物-反应模型,从而对刺激-生物-反应理论做出了贡献。此元分析也有助于点对点住宿和共享经济文献,并为住宿平台提供商及其上市房屋制定营销策略和政策提供实用建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
20.90%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Psychology & Marketing (P&M) publishes original research and review articles dealing with the application of psychological theories and techniques to marketing. As an interdisciplinary journal, P&M serves practitioners and academicians in the fields of psychology and marketing and is an appropriate outlet for articles designed to be of interest, concern, and applied value to its audience of scholars and professionals. Manuscripts that use psychological theory to better understand the various aspects of the marketing of products and services are appropriate for submission.
期刊最新文献
The bittersweet of consumer–human brand relationships in the social media context Eliminating customer experience pain points in complex customer journeys through smart service solutions The purity premium effect: The asymmetrical value change around pure products When “good enough” is not good enough: How maximizing benefits financial well‐being Beyond humans: Consumer reluctance to adopt zoonotic artificial intelligence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1