{"title":"‘It’s in my blood, in my food and in my soul’: current understandings of Puerto Ricanness within the Puerto Rican nation","authors":"Jorge E. Ramos","doi":"10.1080/14608944.2023.2270448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAlthough the United Nations no longer classifies Puerto Rico as a colony, Puerto Rico poses theoretical and empirical challenges to inquiries about national identity within (post-)colonial situations. Gazing through a sociohistorical lens, the present study explores how beliefs about legitimate membership criteria relate to self-identified Puerto Ricans’ understanding of their and in-group others’ national identity. By contextualizing current perceptions of national identity as linked to an emergent Puerto Rican nationalism throughout the nineteenth- and twentieth-century, this paper relates individual-level conceptions of membership criteria to institutional and discursive interventions, thereby contributing to studies of national identity in colonially (un)settled times.KEYWORDS: Beliefsculturemembership criterianational identityPuerto Rico Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, J. E. R., upon reasonable request.Notes1 This study was granted an exemption by the author’s IRB-granting institution; review type: non-committee.2 The ‘hybrid’ racial category trigueño is widely and commonly used on the island to indicate that someone’s skin color is not as dark as ‘black’ or not a light as ‘white’; the category ‘people of color’ or de color can, depending on the social context, be understood as a euphemism to categorize people as Black in Puerto Rico. However, the fact that all nine participants who identified using this category were residing in the U.S. might suggest an adherence to ‘people of color’ as a way to index ‘non-white’. For a fuller discussion of these terms in Puerto Rico see Godreau (Citation2008).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJorge E. RamosJorge E. Ramos is a Ph.D. student in Spanish Linguistics at Georgetown University. His research interests include language attitudes and beliefs, (national) identity and social perception.","PeriodicalId":45917,"journal":{"name":"NATIONAL IDENTITIES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NATIONAL IDENTITIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14608944.2023.2270448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACTAlthough the United Nations no longer classifies Puerto Rico as a colony, Puerto Rico poses theoretical and empirical challenges to inquiries about national identity within (post-)colonial situations. Gazing through a sociohistorical lens, the present study explores how beliefs about legitimate membership criteria relate to self-identified Puerto Ricans’ understanding of their and in-group others’ national identity. By contextualizing current perceptions of national identity as linked to an emergent Puerto Rican nationalism throughout the nineteenth- and twentieth-century, this paper relates individual-level conceptions of membership criteria to institutional and discursive interventions, thereby contributing to studies of national identity in colonially (un)settled times.KEYWORDS: Beliefsculturemembership criterianational identityPuerto Rico Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data availability statementThe data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author, J. E. R., upon reasonable request.Notes1 This study was granted an exemption by the author’s IRB-granting institution; review type: non-committee.2 The ‘hybrid’ racial category trigueño is widely and commonly used on the island to indicate that someone’s skin color is not as dark as ‘black’ or not a light as ‘white’; the category ‘people of color’ or de color can, depending on the social context, be understood as a euphemism to categorize people as Black in Puerto Rico. However, the fact that all nine participants who identified using this category were residing in the U.S. might suggest an adherence to ‘people of color’ as a way to index ‘non-white’. For a fuller discussion of these terms in Puerto Rico see Godreau (Citation2008).Additional informationNotes on contributorsJorge E. RamosJorge E. Ramos is a Ph.D. student in Spanish Linguistics at Georgetown University. His research interests include language attitudes and beliefs, (national) identity and social perception.
虽然联合国不再将波多黎各归类为殖民地,但波多黎各对(后)殖民局势下的国家认同问题提出了理论和经验上的挑战。通过社会历史的视角,本研究探讨了关于合法成员标准的信念如何与自我认同的波多黎各人对他们和群体内其他人的国家身份的理解有关。通过将当前对国家认同的看法与整个19世纪和20世纪新兴的波多黎各民族主义联系起来,本文将个人层面的成员标准概念与制度和话语干预联系起来,从而有助于研究殖民地(未)定居时期的国家认同。关键词:信仰、文化、记忆、标准、国籍、波多黎各披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据可用性声明支持本研究结果的数据可根据通讯作者j.e.r.的合理要求获得。注1本研究获得了作者的irb授权机构的豁免;审查方式:非委员会“混血”种族类别trigueño在岛上广泛而常用,表示某人的肤色不像“黑”那么深,也不像“白”那么亮;根据社会背景,“有色人种”或“de color”这一类别可以被理解为将波多黎各人归类为黑人的委婉说法。然而,所有使用这一分类的9名参与者都居住在美国,这一事实可能表明,“有色人种”是一种对“非白人”进行分类的方法。有关这些术语在波多黎各的更全面的讨论,请参阅Godreau (Citation2008)。作者简介:jorge E. Ramos jorge E. Ramos是乔治城大学西班牙语语言学的博士生。主要研究方向为语言态度与信仰、(民族)认同与社会认知。
期刊介绍:
National Identities explores the formation and expression of national identity from antiquity to the present day. It examines the role in forging identity of cultural (language, architecture, music, gender, religion, the media, sport, encounters with "the other" etc.) and political (state forms, wars, boundaries) factors, by examining how these have been shaped and changed over time. The historical significance of "nation"in political and cultural terms is considered in relationship to other important and in some cases countervailing forms of identity such as religion, region, tribe or class. The focus is on identity, rather than on contingent political forms that may express it. The journal is not prescriptive or proscriptive in its approach.