Cut Elimination for Extended Sequent Calculi

Q2 Arts and Humanities Bulletin of the Section of Logic Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.18778/0138-0680.2023.22
Simone Martini, Andrea Masini, Margherita Zorzi
{"title":"Cut Elimination for Extended Sequent Calculi","authors":"Simone Martini, Andrea Masini, Margherita Zorzi","doi":"10.18778/0138-0680.2023.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We present a syntactical cut-elimination proof for an extended sequent calculus covering the classical modal logics in the \\(\\mathsf{K}\\), \\(\\mathsf{D}\\), \\(\\mathsf{T}\\), \\(\\mathsf{K4}\\), \\(\\mathsf{D4}\\) and \\(\\mathsf{S4}\\) spectrum. We design the systems uniformly since they all share the same set of rules. Different logics are obtained by “tuning” a single parameter, namely a constraint on the applicability of the cut rule and on the (left and right, respectively) rules for \\(\\Box\\) and \\(\\Diamond\\). Starting points for this research are 2-sequents and indexed-based calculi (sequents and tableaux). By extending and modifying existing proposals, we show how to achieve a syntactical proof of the cut-elimination theorem that is as close as possible to the one for first-order classical logic.In doing this, we implicitly show how small is the proof-theoretical distance between classical logic and the systems under consideration.","PeriodicalId":38667,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the Section of Logic","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18778/0138-0680.2023.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We present a syntactical cut-elimination proof for an extended sequent calculus covering the classical modal logics in the \(\mathsf{K}\), \(\mathsf{D}\), \(\mathsf{T}\), \(\mathsf{K4}\), \(\mathsf{D4}\) and \(\mathsf{S4}\) spectrum. We design the systems uniformly since they all share the same set of rules. Different logics are obtained by “tuning” a single parameter, namely a constraint on the applicability of the cut rule and on the (left and right, respectively) rules for \(\Box\) and \(\Diamond\). Starting points for this research are 2-sequents and indexed-based calculi (sequents and tableaux). By extending and modifying existing proposals, we show how to achieve a syntactical proof of the cut-elimination theorem that is as close as possible to the one for first-order classical logic.In doing this, we implicitly show how small is the proof-theoretical distance between classical logic and the systems under consideration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
扩展序列微积分的切消法
我们给出了一个扩展序列演算的句法切消证明,该演算涵盖了\(\mathsf{K}\), \(\mathsf{D}\), \(\mathsf{T}\), \(\mathsf{K4}\), \(\mathsf{D4}\)和\(\mathsf{S4}\)谱中的经典模态逻辑。我们统一设计系统,因为它们都共享同一套规则。不同的逻辑是通过“调优”单个参数获得的,即对cut规则的适用性和对\(\Box\)和\(\Diamond\)的(分别为左和右)规则的约束。本研究的出发点是基于2序列和索引的演算(序列和表)。通过扩展和修改现有的建议,我们展示了如何实现尽可能接近一阶经典逻辑的切消定理的句法证明。在这样做的过程中,我们隐含地表明经典逻辑和所考虑的系统之间的证明理论距离有多小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Bulletin of the Section of Logic
Bulletin of the Section of Logic Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
On pre-Hilbert and positive implicative pre-Hilbert algebras Free Spectra of Equivalential Algebras with Conjunction on Dense Elements Meaning is Use: the Case of Propositional Identity Fuzzy Sub-Equality Algebras Based on Fuzzy Points Linear Abelian Modal Logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1