Examining the fire risk in London dwellings using the London Fire Brigade Incident database

IF 2 4区 材料科学 Q3 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Fire and Materials Pub Date : 2023-09-25 DOI:10.1002/fam.3177
Matthew Bonner, Leonardo Caracci, Guillermo Rein
{"title":"Examining the fire risk in London dwellings using the London Fire Brigade Incident database","authors":"Matthew Bonner,&nbsp;Leonardo Caracci,&nbsp;Guillermo Rein","doi":"10.1002/fam.3177","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Analysis of the Fire Brigade's database of fires in London between 2009 and 2020 provided insight into the level of fire safety in the city and how it varies across different types of dwellings and different levels of protection. Regarding the number of fires, fatalities, and injuries, fire safety in London has significantly improved on average over these years. However, average trends cannot analyze catastrophic fires with multiple fatalities, like at Grenfell Tower in 2017, as these events are too rare to form a suitable sample size. Dwelling fires are the most lethal in London: despite accounting for only 28% of fires, they lead to 87% of fatalities and 83% of injuries. The odds of a dwelling fire becoming fatal in London fell from 1 in 174 in 2009 to 1 in 208 in 2019, a decrease of 16%. The total number of fires has decreased over this period, and the number of fires where an alarm was raised has increased, suggesting that the prevention and detection layers of fire safety have improved, while our analysis suggests that the level of protection from the compartmentation and evacuation layers has remained constant over time. An analysis of the different layers of fire protection suggests that compartmentation was the most impactful layer, with a failure in compartmentation increasing the odds of a fire being fatal by 1.5 to 5 times. Overall, this analysis shows that the fire hazard to Londoners in general is low and the lowest since 2009; however, there is still a threat that should not be understated.</p>","PeriodicalId":12186,"journal":{"name":"Fire and Materials","volume":"48 2","pages":"192-207"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/fam.3177","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire and Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fam.3177","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Analysis of the Fire Brigade's database of fires in London between 2009 and 2020 provided insight into the level of fire safety in the city and how it varies across different types of dwellings and different levels of protection. Regarding the number of fires, fatalities, and injuries, fire safety in London has significantly improved on average over these years. However, average trends cannot analyze catastrophic fires with multiple fatalities, like at Grenfell Tower in 2017, as these events are too rare to form a suitable sample size. Dwelling fires are the most lethal in London: despite accounting for only 28% of fires, they lead to 87% of fatalities and 83% of injuries. The odds of a dwelling fire becoming fatal in London fell from 1 in 174 in 2009 to 1 in 208 in 2019, a decrease of 16%. The total number of fires has decreased over this period, and the number of fires where an alarm was raised has increased, suggesting that the prevention and detection layers of fire safety have improved, while our analysis suggests that the level of protection from the compartmentation and evacuation layers has remained constant over time. An analysis of the different layers of fire protection suggests that compartmentation was the most impactful layer, with a failure in compartmentation increasing the odds of a fire being fatal by 1.5 to 5 times. Overall, this analysis shows that the fire hazard to Londoners in general is low and the lowest since 2009; however, there is still a threat that should not be understated.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用伦敦消防队事故数据库研究伦敦住宅的火灾风险
通过对消防队 2009 年至 2020 年伦敦火灾数据库的分析,我们可以深入了解伦敦的消防安全水平,以及不同类型的住宅和不同级别的保护措施之间的差异。就火灾数量、死亡人数和受伤人数而言,伦敦的消防安全水平在这些年里平均有了显著提高。然而,平均趋势无法分析像 2017 年格伦费尔大楼那样造成多人死亡的灾难性火灾,因为这些事件过于罕见,无法形成合适的样本量。住宅火灾是伦敦最致命的火灾:尽管只占火灾总数的 28%,但却导致了 87% 的死亡和 83% 的受伤。伦敦住宅火灾的致命几率从 2009 年的 174 分之 1 降至 2019 年的 208 分之 1,下降了 16%。在此期间,火灾总数有所下降,而发出警报的火灾数量有所增加,这表明消防安全的预防和探测层有所改善,而我们的分析表明,隔间和疏散层的保护水平随着时间的推移保持不变。对不同防火层的分析表明,隔间是影响最大的一层,隔间失效会使火灾造成死亡的几率增加 1.5 到 5 倍。总体而言,这项分析表明,伦敦居民普遍面临的火灾危险较低,是自 2009 年以来最低的;但是,仍然存在不容低估的威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Fire and Materials
Fire and Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
5.30%
发文量
72
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Fire and Materials is an international journal for scientific and technological communications directed at the fire properties of materials and the products into which they are made. This covers all aspects of the polymer field and the end uses where polymers find application; the important developments in the fields of natural products - wood and cellulosics; non-polymeric materials - metals and ceramics; as well as the chemistry and industrial applications of fire retardant chemicals. Contributions will be particularly welcomed on heat release; properties of combustion products - smoke opacity, toxicity and corrosivity; modelling and testing.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information Analyzing thermal-moisture comfort and thermal protective performance of phase change materials dripped protective clothing Effect of silane coupling agent on mechanical properties, flame retardancy, and ceramifiable behavior of ceramifiable flame-retardant silicone rubber composite Enhancing fire safety and thermal performance: Wood composites with bio-based phase change materials and fire retardants for building applications
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1