Antiracism in appreciative inquiry: Generative tensions and collective reflexivity

IF 1.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT Action Research Pub Date : 2023-11-03 DOI:10.1177/14767503231210418
Amanda Gebhard, Willow Samara Allen, Fritz Pino
{"title":"Antiracism in appreciative inquiry: Generative tensions and collective reflexivity","authors":"Amanda Gebhard, Willow Samara Allen, Fritz Pino","doi":"10.1177/14767503231210418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Appreciative inquiry is an action research methodology focused on revealing an organization’s positive core. As a cross-racial team of antiracist researchers, we were drawn to appreciative inquiry due to its congruences with community-based research perspectives on power-sharing and co-constructing knowledge. Our collaborative reflexivity brought us to question whether Appreciative inquiry’s hyper-focus on positivity would fit our antiracist research paradigm. We articulate reflections of how antiracism theory informed our approach to Appreciative inquiry in a study on the experiences of predominantly racialized settlement workers in schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explain how we negotiated tensions between Appreciative inquiry’s focus on positivity and our antiracist framing, in a Canadian settler colonial context where institutional expectations to ignore racism and collapse diversity, loom large. Without a theoretical framework that attends to racism and power, Appreciative inquiry may not fulsomely address participants’ transnational knowledges, nor experiences outside of a positive/negative binary. In our elucidation of how critical reflexivity on racism allowed us to integrate antiracism into Appreciative inquiry, we demonstrate the value of first-person action research for expanding the social justice aims of research.","PeriodicalId":46969,"journal":{"name":"Action Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231210418","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Appreciative inquiry is an action research methodology focused on revealing an organization’s positive core. As a cross-racial team of antiracist researchers, we were drawn to appreciative inquiry due to its congruences with community-based research perspectives on power-sharing and co-constructing knowledge. Our collaborative reflexivity brought us to question whether Appreciative inquiry’s hyper-focus on positivity would fit our antiracist research paradigm. We articulate reflections of how antiracism theory informed our approach to Appreciative inquiry in a study on the experiences of predominantly racialized settlement workers in schools during the COVID-19 pandemic. We explain how we negotiated tensions between Appreciative inquiry’s focus on positivity and our antiracist framing, in a Canadian settler colonial context where institutional expectations to ignore racism and collapse diversity, loom large. Without a theoretical framework that attends to racism and power, Appreciative inquiry may not fulsomely address participants’ transnational knowledges, nor experiences outside of a positive/negative binary. In our elucidation of how critical reflexivity on racism allowed us to integrate antiracism into Appreciative inquiry, we demonstrate the value of first-person action research for expanding the social justice aims of research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欣赏探究中的反种族主义:生成张力和集体反身性
赞赏式调查是一种行动研究方法,侧重于揭示组织的积极核心。作为一个跨种族的反种族主义研究团队,我们被吸引到欣赏调查,因为它与基于社区的权力分享和共同构建知识的研究观点一致。我们的合作反身性让我们质疑,欣赏式探究对积极性的高度关注是否适合我们的反种族主义研究范式。在一项关于2019冠状病毒病大流行期间学校主要种族化安置工人经历的研究中,我们阐述了反种族主义理论如何指导我们的欣赏式调查方法。我们解释了我们如何在加拿大定居者殖民背景下,在忽视种族主义和崩溃多样性的制度期望日益突出的情况下,在重视调查的积极性和我们的反种族主义框架之间协调紧张关系。如果没有一个关注种族主义和权力的理论框架,欣赏式探究可能不会过分地处理参与者的跨国知识,也不会处理积极/消极二元之外的经验。在我们对种族主义的批判性反思如何使我们将反种族主义融入欣赏式调查的阐述中,我们展示了第一人称行动研究对于扩大研究的社会正义目标的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Action Research
Action Research Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Action Research is a new international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal which is a forum for the development of the theory and practice of action research. Our purpose with this international, peer reviewed journal is to offer a forum for participative, action oriented inquiry into questions that matter--questions relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, that enable them to flourish in their organizations and communities, and that evince a deep concern for the wider ecology. The aim of the journal is to offer a viable alternative to dominant "disinterested" models of social science, one that is relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, their organizations and their communities.
期刊最新文献
How long-term emancipatory programming facilitates participatory evaluation: Building a methodology of participation through research with youth in Honduras. Photovoice for promoting empowerment with migrant and refugee communities: A scoping review Participatory action research: A tool to develop occupational health and safety education for new immigrant workers Benefits of reflection-based monitoring in action research projects Action research with sociodrama in a healthcare institution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1