A49 Five Year Review of Paediatric Multidisciplinary In-Situ Simulation on a General Paediatric Ward

Shoshana Layman, Catherine Beatty, Chukwudumebi Mbeledogu, Lucine Nahabedian, Ashish Patel, Ash Holt, Annabel Copeman
{"title":"A49 Five Year Review of Paediatric Multidisciplinary In-Situ Simulation on a General Paediatric Ward","authors":"Shoshana Layman, Catherine Beatty, Chukwudumebi Mbeledogu, Lucine Nahabedian, Ashish Patel, Ash Holt, Annabel Copeman","doi":"10.54531/jnpi7905","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the United Kingdom, trainee doctors rotate through different specialities during their training. They are often unfamiliar with systems, environments, and personnel. Working on a general paediatric ward in a district general hospital can be anxiety inducing for those new to paediatrics. Fortnightly low-fidelity simulation scenarios are embedded in our local teaching schedule to improve confidence amongst the medical and nursing team. These are performed on the ward addressing varied scenarios, aiming to increase confidence with clinical cases, improve local environment and systems awareness, and enhance communication between professionals. Fortnightly 30-minute simulation sessions are run by the paediatric simulation team on the paediatric ward at our trust. The wider multidisciplinary team are invited, including nurses and health care assistants. The emergency buzzer from a bed space is pulled, and those involved attend and a scenario is undertaken. The scenario is structured to involve the wider team to improve interdisciplinary working and non-technical skills, as well as address clinical outcomes. Equipment is provided using a grab bag. Once the scenario has ended, a debrief is performed involving candidates and observers of all disciplines, to discuss technical and non-technical skills. Post session feedback was collected on each occasion with quantitative data via Likert scales and qualitative data by free text questions. In-situ simulation has been part of the departmental paediatric teaching rota since 2009 but has been a regular fortnightly occurrence since 2018. This is because it has been rostered into our working hours before the medical team assume clinical duties. We have collected feedback since September 2018. We have had 616 participants and delivered 82 scenarios in the clinical environment. This includes during the Covid pandemic. The weighted average confidence recorded by candidates pre-scenario was 2.51 with confidence post-scenario recorded as 3.69. 83% reported improved confidence following the scenario. This is an important finding as 45% had never encountered the scenario before in their practice. Thematic analysis has highlighted key aspects including communication, escalation, teamwork and available resources. In-situ, low fidelity simulation is an effective tool to improve human factors amongst the multidisciplinary team on a paediatric ward. By regularly simulating clinical practice in their daily working environment, all candidates have demonstrated improved clinical confidence and better familiarity with the ward environment. Additionally, the fortnightly in-situ simulation has improved working relationships through recognition of the roles of the ward multidisciplinary team, communication skills and team and leaderships skills. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"45 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/jnpi7905","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the United Kingdom, trainee doctors rotate through different specialities during their training. They are often unfamiliar with systems, environments, and personnel. Working on a general paediatric ward in a district general hospital can be anxiety inducing for those new to paediatrics. Fortnightly low-fidelity simulation scenarios are embedded in our local teaching schedule to improve confidence amongst the medical and nursing team. These are performed on the ward addressing varied scenarios, aiming to increase confidence with clinical cases, improve local environment and systems awareness, and enhance communication between professionals. Fortnightly 30-minute simulation sessions are run by the paediatric simulation team on the paediatric ward at our trust. The wider multidisciplinary team are invited, including nurses and health care assistants. The emergency buzzer from a bed space is pulled, and those involved attend and a scenario is undertaken. The scenario is structured to involve the wider team to improve interdisciplinary working and non-technical skills, as well as address clinical outcomes. Equipment is provided using a grab bag. Once the scenario has ended, a debrief is performed involving candidates and observers of all disciplines, to discuss technical and non-technical skills. Post session feedback was collected on each occasion with quantitative data via Likert scales and qualitative data by free text questions. In-situ simulation has been part of the departmental paediatric teaching rota since 2009 but has been a regular fortnightly occurrence since 2018. This is because it has been rostered into our working hours before the medical team assume clinical duties. We have collected feedback since September 2018. We have had 616 participants and delivered 82 scenarios in the clinical environment. This includes during the Covid pandemic. The weighted average confidence recorded by candidates pre-scenario was 2.51 with confidence post-scenario recorded as 3.69. 83% reported improved confidence following the scenario. This is an important finding as 45% had never encountered the scenario before in their practice. Thematic analysis has highlighted key aspects including communication, escalation, teamwork and available resources. In-situ, low fidelity simulation is an effective tool to improve human factors amongst the multidisciplinary team on a paediatric ward. By regularly simulating clinical practice in their daily working environment, all candidates have demonstrated improved clinical confidence and better familiarity with the ward environment. Additionally, the fortnightly in-situ simulation has improved working relationships through recognition of the roles of the ward multidisciplinary team, communication skills and team and leaderships skills. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A49儿科综合病房多学科现场模拟的五年回顾
在英国,实习医生在培训期间轮流在不同的专业实习。他们通常不熟悉系统、环境和人员。在地区综合医院的普通儿科病房工作可能会引起那些儿科新手的焦虑。每两周低保真模拟场景嵌入在我们当地的教学计划中,以提高医疗和护理团队之间的信心。这些都是在病房进行的,针对不同的情况,旨在增加对临床病例的信心,改善当地环境和系统意识,并加强专业人员之间的沟通。每两周由儿科模拟小组在我们的儿科病房进行30分钟的模拟会议。邀请更广泛的多学科团队,包括护士和保健助理。从床空间的紧急蜂鸣器被拉出来,相关人员出席并进行了一个场景。该方案的结构涉及更广泛的团队,以提高跨学科工作和非技术技能,以及解决临床结果。设备是用抓斗袋提供的。一旦场景结束,将对所有学科的候选人和观察员进行汇报,以讨论技术和非技术技能。每次会议后反馈通过李克特量表收集定量数据,通过自由文本问题收集定性数据。自2009年以来,现场模拟一直是该系儿科教学轮岗的一部分,但自2018年以来,每两周定期进行一次。这是因为它在医疗队承担临床职责之前已被列入我们的工作时间。我们从2018年9月开始收集反馈。我们有616名参与者,在临床环境中提供了82个场景。这包括在Covid大流行期间。候选人在情景前的加权平均置信度为2.51,情景后的置信度为3.69。83%的受访者表示,在这种情况下,他们的信心有所提高。这是一项重大发现45%以前从未遇到的场景在他们的实践。专题分析强调了沟通、升级、团队合作和可用资源等关键方面。现场,低保真模拟是一个有效的工具,以改善人为因素在儿科病房多学科团队。通过在日常工作环境中定期模拟临床实践,所有候选人都表现出了更好的临床信心和对病房环境的熟悉程度。此外,通过认识病房多学科团队的角色、沟通技巧、团队和领导技能,每两周进行一次的现场模拟改善了工作关系。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pilot study comparing immersive virtual reality simulation and computerized virtual patient simulation in undergraduate medical education Use of prebriefing in simulation-based experience for nursing education: a scoping review Cross-discipline teaching and learning of cardiology through an augmented reality application The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations A75 Strengthening simulation quality assurance through the ‘Sim QA bundle’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1