A78 STEPS: Development of a communication skills framework for use in a broad range of simulation-based education

Carrie Hamilton, Anna Thame, Jess Spencer
{"title":"A78 STEPS: Development of a communication skills framework for use in a broad range of simulation-based education","authors":"Carrie Hamilton, Anna Thame, Jess Spencer","doi":"10.54531/kfey4279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Effective communication is a vital skill in healthcare, whether discussing sensitive or challenging topics, explaining decisions, supporting colleagues, welcoming staff, de-escalating situations, reviewing accolades and complaints or building rapport. Many people find it difficult to initiate, hold, conclude and follow-up conversations. Simulation-based education (SBE) has been identified as an effective way to improve communication skills, however, a structured communication skills framework is necessary. A plethora of established communication skills frameworks [1-3] exist, each excellent within their own sphere. Our purpose was to develop a generalizable, transferable framework to suit the broad range of communications covered in SBE; a framework which can be repeated, practised, and easily memorized. Experts in communication skills, healthcare education, and SBE reviewed existing communication skills frameworks. The new framework’s foundations were key skills, within every conversation, between healthcare professionals and colleagues, patients or relatives/carers, or between non-healthcare professionals and colleagues/clients. Thematic analysis of data from participants of sessions from the previous five years identified these themes: Why, when, where and how to start a conversation The best time to have a conversation Showing empathy and listening (verbal and nonverbal skills) Providing support, without being solution orientated How to sense-check ourselves and others, after the conversation The STEPS framework was developed two years ago and has been used by our facilitators in SBE, to assist participants to be confident in structuring and having conversations. The five-step framework has a memorable mnemonic STEPS; Start, Time, Empathy, Provide-support, and Sense-check. STEPS has been well received by over 500 participants. They have reported that it is easy to remember and highly applicable to situations in and out of work. Post-intervention surveys showed significant improvement in learners’ confidence and perceived competence in holding conversations. Focus group discussions revealed that learners found the STEPS approach helpful in managing their own emotions and in creating an open dialogue with others. The STEPS approach is a generalizable communication skills framework that can be implemented in SBE activities to improve people’s understanding of structuring conversations. It has had a positive impact on participants particularly regarding their perceptions of having ‘challenging’ conversations. The STEPS approach can be used to guide healthcare and non-healthcare professionals in various settings and is a valuable tool in improving person-centred communication. STEPS helps people initiate, structure and navigate a conversation with kindness and in a way that makes constructive outcomes possible. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/kfey4279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Effective communication is a vital skill in healthcare, whether discussing sensitive or challenging topics, explaining decisions, supporting colleagues, welcoming staff, de-escalating situations, reviewing accolades and complaints or building rapport. Many people find it difficult to initiate, hold, conclude and follow-up conversations. Simulation-based education (SBE) has been identified as an effective way to improve communication skills, however, a structured communication skills framework is necessary. A plethora of established communication skills frameworks [1-3] exist, each excellent within their own sphere. Our purpose was to develop a generalizable, transferable framework to suit the broad range of communications covered in SBE; a framework which can be repeated, practised, and easily memorized. Experts in communication skills, healthcare education, and SBE reviewed existing communication skills frameworks. The new framework’s foundations were key skills, within every conversation, between healthcare professionals and colleagues, patients or relatives/carers, or between non-healthcare professionals and colleagues/clients. Thematic analysis of data from participants of sessions from the previous five years identified these themes: Why, when, where and how to start a conversation The best time to have a conversation Showing empathy and listening (verbal and nonverbal skills) Providing support, without being solution orientated How to sense-check ourselves and others, after the conversation The STEPS framework was developed two years ago and has been used by our facilitators in SBE, to assist participants to be confident in structuring and having conversations. The five-step framework has a memorable mnemonic STEPS; Start, Time, Empathy, Provide-support, and Sense-check. STEPS has been well received by over 500 participants. They have reported that it is easy to remember and highly applicable to situations in and out of work. Post-intervention surveys showed significant improvement in learners’ confidence and perceived competence in holding conversations. Focus group discussions revealed that learners found the STEPS approach helpful in managing their own emotions and in creating an open dialogue with others. The STEPS approach is a generalizable communication skills framework that can be implemented in SBE activities to improve people’s understanding of structuring conversations. It has had a positive impact on participants particularly regarding their perceptions of having ‘challenging’ conversations. The STEPS approach can be used to guide healthcare and non-healthcare professionals in various settings and is a valuable tool in improving person-centred communication. STEPS helps people initiate, structure and navigate a conversation with kindness and in a way that makes constructive outcomes possible. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
步骤:开发一个沟通技巧框架,用于广泛的基于模拟的教育
在医疗保健领域,有效的沟通是一项至关重要的技能,无论是讨论敏感或具有挑战性的话题、解释决定、支持同事、欢迎员工、缓解紧张局势、审查表扬和投诉,还是建立融洽的关系。许多人发现很难发起、保持、结束和跟进对话。基于模拟的教育(SBE)已被认为是提高沟通技能的有效途径,然而,一个结构化的沟通技能框架是必要的。现有的沟通技巧框架有很多[1-3],每一个都在各自的领域内表现出色。我们的目的是开发一个通用的、可转移的框架,以适应SBE所涵盖的广泛通信;一个可以重复、练习和容易记忆的框架。沟通技巧、医疗保健教育和SBE方面的专家审查了现有的沟通技巧框架。新框架的基础是医疗保健专业人员与同事、患者或亲属/护理人员之间,或非医疗保健专业人员与同事/客户之间的每次对话中的关键技能。对过去五年各届会议与会者提供的数据进行专题分析,确定了以下主题:为什么,何时,何地以及如何开始谈话进行谈话的最佳时间进行谈话表现出同情和倾听(口头和非口头技能)提供支持,而不是以解决方案为导向如何在谈话后感觉检查自己和他人STEPS框架是两年前开发的,并已被我们的主持人在SBE中使用,以帮助参与者在组织和进行谈话时充满信心。五步框架有易于记忆的助记步骤;开始,时间,同理心,提供支持,感觉检查。STEPS得到了500多名参与者的好评。他们报告说,这很容易记住,并且非常适用于工作内外的情况。干预后的调查显示,学习者的信心和对话能力有了显著的提高。焦点小组讨论显示,学习者发现STEPS方法有助于管理自己的情绪,并与他人建立开放的对话。STEPS方法是一个可推广的沟通技巧框架,可以在SBE活动中实施,以提高人们对结构化对话的理解。它对参与者产生了积极的影响,特别是在他们对进行“具有挑战性”对话的看法方面。STEPS方法可用于在各种环境中指导医疗保健和非医疗保健专业人员,并且是改善以人为本的沟通的宝贵工具。STEPS帮助人们以善意的方式发起、组织和引导对话,并使建设性的结果成为可能。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pilot study comparing immersive virtual reality simulation and computerized virtual patient simulation in undergraduate medical education Use of prebriefing in simulation-based experience for nursing education: a scoping review Cross-discipline teaching and learning of cardiology through an augmented reality application The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations A75 Strengthening simulation quality assurance through the ‘Sim QA bundle’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1