Layers and dynamics of social impact: Musicians’ perspectives on participatory music activities

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 0 MUSIC Musicae Scientiae Pub Date : 2023-10-31 DOI:10.1177/10298649231205553
Anemone G W van Zijl, An De bisschop
{"title":"Layers and dynamics of social impact: Musicians’ perspectives on participatory music activities","authors":"Anemone G W van Zijl, An De bisschop","doi":"10.1177/10298649231205553","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Participatory music activities designed to fulfill both artistic and social aims have become widespread across the world. Such activities are often linked to the generation of social impact. In the present research, we explored musicians’ perspectives on the social impact of these activities. A total of 47 musicians with experience in leading participatory music activities in various settings in Belgium completed a survey; 21 took part in follow-up, in-depth interviews. We used a constructive grounded-theory approach to analyze the data. The findings of previous research, typically exploring participants’ perspectives, suggest that social impact should be understood as effects on participants that persist after the activity has taken place. Our findings suggest, by contrast, that musicians who lead participatory music activities conceptualize the social impact of their work as layered and dynamic: layered meaning that social impact can be situated on the level of the musicians’ intentions, the core aspects of their practice, and its effects on themselves as musicians, on participants, and on the wider society; dynamic meaning they see these layers as interacting with and influencing each other. These findings may contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the social impact of participatory music activities and have implications for practice, policy, and future research.","PeriodicalId":47219,"journal":{"name":"Musicae Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Musicae Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10298649231205553","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Participatory music activities designed to fulfill both artistic and social aims have become widespread across the world. Such activities are often linked to the generation of social impact. In the present research, we explored musicians’ perspectives on the social impact of these activities. A total of 47 musicians with experience in leading participatory music activities in various settings in Belgium completed a survey; 21 took part in follow-up, in-depth interviews. We used a constructive grounded-theory approach to analyze the data. The findings of previous research, typically exploring participants’ perspectives, suggest that social impact should be understood as effects on participants that persist after the activity has taken place. Our findings suggest, by contrast, that musicians who lead participatory music activities conceptualize the social impact of their work as layered and dynamic: layered meaning that social impact can be situated on the level of the musicians’ intentions, the core aspects of their practice, and its effects on themselves as musicians, on participants, and on the wider society; dynamic meaning they see these layers as interacting with and influencing each other. These findings may contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the social impact of participatory music activities and have implications for practice, policy, and future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
社会影响的层次和动态:音乐家对参与式音乐活动的看法
旨在实现艺术和社会目标的参与性音乐活动在世界各地都很普遍。这些活动往往与产生社会影响有关。在本研究中,我们探讨了音乐家对这些活动的社会影响的看法。共有47名音乐家在比利时的各种环境中领导参与式音乐活动,他们完成了一项调查;21人参加了后续深入采访。我们使用建设性的理论基础方法来分析数据。先前的研究结果,通常是探索参与者的观点,表明社会影响应该被理解为在活动发生后对参与者的持续影响。相比之下,我们的研究结果表明,领导参与式音乐活动的音乐家将他们的工作的社会影响概念化为分层和动态的:分层意味着社会影响可以位于音乐家的意图,他们实践的核心方面,以及它对音乐家自己,参与者和更广泛的社会的影响;动态意味着他们认为这些层次是相互作用和影响的。这些发现可能有助于更细致入微地理解参与式音乐活动的社会影响,并对实践、政策和未来的研究产生影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Musicae Scientiae
Musicae Scientiae Multiple-
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: MUSICAE SCIENTIAE is the trilingual journal, official organ of ESCOM, published with the financial support of the Belgian Science Policy.
期刊最新文献
Characterizing music for sleep: A comparison of Spotify playlists Performance profiling: A systematic approach to the enhancement of music practice and peak performance A phrase in a loop: A rethink of verbatim repetition in the speech-to-song illusion and a new approach to the study of involuntary auditory imagery Assessing aesthetic music-evoked emotions in a minute or less: A comparison of the GEMS-45 and the GEMS-9 Opera trainees' cognitive functioning is associated with physiological stress during performance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1