In the Eye of the Storm: Hospital Leaders’ Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Nina Fuereder, Charlotte Foerster
{"title":"In the Eye of the Storm: Hospital Leaders’ Resilience During the COVID-19 Pandemic","authors":"Nina Fuereder, Charlotte Foerster","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.14947abstract","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While health care leaders were already at a high risk for psychological and physiological illnesses long before the pandemic, COVID-19 only exacerbated this situation. Recognizing the crucial role of leaders in organizational crises and building on the conservation of resources theory, our study examines how hospital leaders cope with difficulties that endure over an extended period of time. By using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example for prolonged adversity in hospitals, we provide insight into the different responses to a given adversity and further expand knowledge about the role of time in crisis and for resilience. Qualitative expert interviews were conducted with 44 hospital leaders in Austria between December 2020 and November 2021. For data analysis, we used a hybrid approach, consisting of both deductive and inductive coding. Our empirical study shows that during prolonged adversity, hospital leaders use two types of resilience, namely acceptance and strategic resilience, in which suitability depends on both the duration of exposure and severity of the adversity. Our findings further show that when immediately confronted with adversity, leaders rely on resource-preserving acceptance resilience, while when dealing with the longer-lasting adversity, leaders rely on resilience-enhancing strategic resilience. Even though leaders rely on both types of resilience, our findings also imply that if opportunities to build strategic resilience are limited, higher burnout and turnover rates might be the consequence.","PeriodicalId":471028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Academy of Management","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.14947abstract","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While health care leaders were already at a high risk for psychological and physiological illnesses long before the pandemic, COVID-19 only exacerbated this situation. Recognizing the crucial role of leaders in organizational crises and building on the conservation of resources theory, our study examines how hospital leaders cope with difficulties that endure over an extended period of time. By using the COVID-19 pandemic as an example for prolonged adversity in hospitals, we provide insight into the different responses to a given adversity and further expand knowledge about the role of time in crisis and for resilience. Qualitative expert interviews were conducted with 44 hospital leaders in Austria between December 2020 and November 2021. For data analysis, we used a hybrid approach, consisting of both deductive and inductive coding. Our empirical study shows that during prolonged adversity, hospital leaders use two types of resilience, namely acceptance and strategic resilience, in which suitability depends on both the duration of exposure and severity of the adversity. Our findings further show that when immediately confronted with adversity, leaders rely on resource-preserving acceptance resilience, while when dealing with the longer-lasting adversity, leaders rely on resilience-enhancing strategic resilience. Even though leaders rely on both types of resilience, our findings also imply that if opportunities to build strategic resilience are limited, higher burnout and turnover rates might be the consequence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
风暴中心:医院领导在COVID-19大流行期间的应变能力
虽然早在大流行之前,卫生保健领导者就已经处于心理和生理疾病的高风险之中,但COVID-19只会加剧这种情况。认识到领导者在组织危机中的关键作用,并以资源保护理论为基础,我们的研究考察了医院领导者如何应对长期存在的困难。通过以2019冠状病毒病大流行为例,我们深入了解了对特定逆境的不同反应,并进一步扩展了关于时间在危机中的作用和复原力的知识。在2020年12月至2021年11月期间,对奥地利44家医院的负责人进行了定性专家访谈。对于数据分析,我们使用了一种混合方法,包括演绎和归纳编码。我们的实证研究表明,在长期逆境中,医院领导者使用两种类型的弹性,即接受和战略弹性,其中适应性取决于暴露的持续时间和逆境的严重程度。我们的研究结果进一步表明,当面对逆境时,领导者依赖于资源保护型接受弹性,而当面对长期逆境时,领导者依赖于弹性增强型战略弹性。尽管领导者依赖这两种类型的弹性,但我们的研究结果还表明,如果建立战略弹性的机会有限,可能会导致更高的倦怠和离职率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Text Comparative Analysis (QTCA): A Mixed-method Approach to Large Text Data Potential and the Gender Promotion Gap Funding Breakthrough Innovation: The Theory of Value Translation Physicians as Leaders: A Systematic Review through the Lens of Expert Leadership ESG and Firm Value Effects of Shareholder Proposals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1