A67 Advanced cardiothoracic Simulation -how to do it and who is it for?

Abdul Badran, Aiman Alzetani
{"title":"A67 Advanced cardiothoracic Simulation -how to do it and who is it for?","authors":"Abdul Badran, Aiman Alzetani","doi":"10.54531/gfpu7452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a large backlog in surgery due to covid as well as surgical training [1]. We explored the feasibility of a dry lab simulation environment to teach advanced surgical specialty skills to learners with different levels of experience. Session description: We ran 5 cardiothoracic surgical simulation courses over 2021-2022 with a total of 61 delegates. We covered coronary anastomosis, aortic valve replacement, video-assisted-thoracoscopic-surgery (VATS) lung wedge resection and pulmonary vessel dissection. Each skill station ran for 40 minutes including a 15-minute description and real-time demo. Target audience: Participants included 36 medical students, 14 specialty doctors and 11 foundation doctors. We used synthetic plastinated and resin printed models with modular metal frames to help with retraction and suspension of the area of interest for the cardiac models. For the VATS models a laptop with connected angled endoscopic camera was utilized. The lung models were 3D printed. 88% of all participants were able to complete all procedures successfully under supervision. 96% of all participants increased in confidence with the procedure following simulation compared to before. Interestingly only 44% of specialty trainees described themselves as confident in some procedures prior to simulation. Of the medical student cohort 95% had not had any previous simulation or surgical experience prior. We have demonstrated the feasibility of a dry lab simulation programme for candidates of all experiences in cardiothoracic surgery. Confidence in surgical technique is low during the COVID era. Simulation improved confidence in surgical technique and must be offered more widely to enhance training experiences. No experience is necessary for successful simulation. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.","PeriodicalId":93766,"journal":{"name":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","volume":"9 4","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of healthcare simulation : advances in theory and practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54531/gfpu7452","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is a large backlog in surgery due to covid as well as surgical training [1]. We explored the feasibility of a dry lab simulation environment to teach advanced surgical specialty skills to learners with different levels of experience. Session description: We ran 5 cardiothoracic surgical simulation courses over 2021-2022 with a total of 61 delegates. We covered coronary anastomosis, aortic valve replacement, video-assisted-thoracoscopic-surgery (VATS) lung wedge resection and pulmonary vessel dissection. Each skill station ran for 40 minutes including a 15-minute description and real-time demo. Target audience: Participants included 36 medical students, 14 specialty doctors and 11 foundation doctors. We used synthetic plastinated and resin printed models with modular metal frames to help with retraction and suspension of the area of interest for the cardiac models. For the VATS models a laptop with connected angled endoscopic camera was utilized. The lung models were 3D printed. 88% of all participants were able to complete all procedures successfully under supervision. 96% of all participants increased in confidence with the procedure following simulation compared to before. Interestingly only 44% of specialty trainees described themselves as confident in some procedures prior to simulation. Of the medical student cohort 95% had not had any previous simulation or surgical experience prior. We have demonstrated the feasibility of a dry lab simulation programme for candidates of all experiences in cardiothoracic surgery. Confidence in surgical technique is low during the COVID era. Simulation improved confidence in surgical technique and must be offered more widely to enhance training experiences. No experience is necessary for successful simulation. Authors confirm that all relevant ethical standards for research conduct and dissemination have been met. The submitting author confirms that relevant ethical approval was granted, if applicable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A67高级心胸模拟-如何做到这一点,谁是它?
由于新冠肺炎疫情,外科手术和外科培训都存在大量积压[1]。我们探索了在干实验室模拟环境下,对不同经验水平的学习者进行高级外科专业技能教学的可行性。会议描述:我们在2021-2022年期间开设了5门心胸外科模拟课程,共有61名代表。我们涵盖了冠状动脉吻合,主动脉瓣置换术,视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)肺楔形切除和肺血管剥离。每个技能站运行40分钟,包括15分钟的描述和实时演示。对象:参会者包括36名医学生、14名专科医生和11名基础医生。我们使用合成塑化和树脂打印模型与模块化的金属框架,以帮助缩回和悬浮感兴趣的区域的心脏模型。对于VATS模型,使用了连接有角度的内窥镜相机的笔记本电脑。肺模型是3D打印的。88%的参与者能够在监督下成功完成所有程序。与之前相比,96%的参与者对模拟后的程序增加了信心。有趣的是,在模拟之前,只有44%的专业受训者表示自己对某些程序有信心。在医学生队列中,95%之前没有任何模拟或手术经验。我们已经证明了干实验室模拟程序的可行性,适用于所有心胸外科经验的候选人。在COVID时代,对手术技术的信心很低。模拟提高了对手术技术的信心,必须更广泛地提供以提高培训经验。成功的模拟不需要经验。作者确认已符合研究行为和传播的所有相关伦理标准。提交作者确认已获得相关的伦理批准(如适用)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A pilot study comparing immersive virtual reality simulation and computerized virtual patient simulation in undergraduate medical education Use of prebriefing in simulation-based experience for nursing education: a scoping review Cross-discipline teaching and learning of cardiology through an augmented reality application The effectiveness and efficiency of using ChatGPT for writing health care simulations A75 Strengthening simulation quality assurance through the ‘Sim QA bundle’
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1