HR Analytics and the Decision-Making Process: An Evidence-Based Management Approach

Amanda Scaf, Liliana Vasconcellos
{"title":"HR Analytics and the Decision-Making Process: An Evidence-Based Management Approach","authors":"Amanda Scaf, Liliana Vasconcellos","doi":"10.5465/amproc.2023.17584abstract","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"HR Analytics (HRA) has gained attention of practitioners and scholars under the promise of providing basis for better decision-making. However, the question about how HRA can be effectively used to support decisions in organizations remains unanswered. Although some scholars suggest Evidence-Based Management (EBM) as a theoretical approach through which HRA would effectively contribute to decisions, the idea has not been empirically tested. Therefore, this study’s objective is to analyze how HRA leads to talent decision-making through the EBM approach. The analysis of how HRA leads to decisions was grounded in the interaction between HR Analytics and EBM along the decision-making process (DMP). A qualitative research approach was employed to assess HR Analytics decision processes performed in organizations located in Brazil. The study relied on 8 semi-structured interviews with professionals who have led or played an important role in a HR Analytics decision process. Content and template analyses were employed as data analysis methods. It was found the Evidence-Based Management approach seemed relevant to (a) provide evidence needed to the conduction of a quantitative analysis and (b) to intermediate HRA’s inputs to decisions. The results also shed light on the nature and different roles of these inputs.","PeriodicalId":471028,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Academy of Management","volume":"29 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Academy of Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5465/amproc.2023.17584abstract","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

HR Analytics (HRA) has gained attention of practitioners and scholars under the promise of providing basis for better decision-making. However, the question about how HRA can be effectively used to support decisions in organizations remains unanswered. Although some scholars suggest Evidence-Based Management (EBM) as a theoretical approach through which HRA would effectively contribute to decisions, the idea has not been empirically tested. Therefore, this study’s objective is to analyze how HRA leads to talent decision-making through the EBM approach. The analysis of how HRA leads to decisions was grounded in the interaction between HR Analytics and EBM along the decision-making process (DMP). A qualitative research approach was employed to assess HR Analytics decision processes performed in organizations located in Brazil. The study relied on 8 semi-structured interviews with professionals who have led or played an important role in a HR Analytics decision process. Content and template analyses were employed as data analysis methods. It was found the Evidence-Based Management approach seemed relevant to (a) provide evidence needed to the conduction of a quantitative analysis and (b) to intermediate HRA’s inputs to decisions. The results also shed light on the nature and different roles of these inputs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人力资源分析和决策过程:基于证据的管理方法
人力资源分析(HR Analytics,简称HRA)因有望为企业更好地决策提供依据而受到实践者和学者的关注。然而,关于如何有效地利用人力资源管理来支持组织决策的问题仍然没有答案。尽管一些学者认为,基于证据的管理(EBM)是一种理论方法,通过这种方法,人力资源管理可以有效地促进决策,但这种想法尚未得到实证检验。因此,本研究的目的是分析人力资源管理如何通过循证医学方法引导人才决策。对人力资源分析如何导致决策的分析是基于人力资源分析和循证医学在决策过程(DMP)中的相互作用。采用定性研究的方法来评估人力资源分析决策过程中执行的组织位于巴西。该研究依赖于8个半结构化访谈,访谈对象是在HR Analytics决策过程中领导或发挥重要作用的专业人士。数据分析方法采用内容分析和模板分析。发现循证管理方法似乎与(a)提供进行定量分析所需的证据和(b)中间HRA对决策的投入相关。研究结果还揭示了这些投入的性质和不同作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Qualitative Text Comparative Analysis (QTCA): A Mixed-method Approach to Large Text Data Potential and the Gender Promotion Gap Funding Breakthrough Innovation: The Theory of Value Translation Physicians as Leaders: A Systematic Review through the Lens of Expert Leadership ESG and Firm Value Effects of Shareholder Proposals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1