Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Clinical Isolates from Orthopaedic Implants Associated Infections

R Shakthi, D Venkatesha
{"title":"Detection of Biofilm Production and Antibiotic Resistance Pattern in Clinical Isolates from Orthopaedic Implants Associated Infections","authors":"R Shakthi, D Venkatesha","doi":"10.46347/jmsh.v9i2.23.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Orthopaedic Implant associated infection is the major problem which leads to implant failure and economic burden to the patient. Implant-associated infections are due to the formation of biofilm at the implantation site leading to multidrug resistant organism. Aim: This study was done to evaluate the causative organisms, their antibiotic sensitivity pattern and their ability to form biofilm over the Implants used in Orthopaedic surgeries. Material and methods: This study was carried out in the department of Microbiology, Adichunchanagiri institute of Medical sciences from September 2019 to August 2022. Swabs from 100 patients who had undergone orthopaedic implant or prosthetic surgery and presented with signs and symptoms of infection were collected and processed as per standard procedures. All the isolates were subjected to detect biofilm production by Congo red agar method, MRSA detection by Cefoxitin disc diffusion test, vancomycin resistant Enterococcus by using Vancomycin (Minimum inhibitory concentration) MIC strips and Extended spectrum β lactamases (ESBL) production by phenotypic confirmatory combined-disc test. Results: Out of the 100 samples processed, culture positivity was observed in 72 specimens. Among them, Staphylococcus aureus 19(26%) was the predominant isolate and 44 (61%) are biofilm producers. 17 (89%) were MRSA (Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus) strains and 15(37%) were ESBL producing strains. Conclusion: The appropriate pre- and post- operative care should be taken to prevent orthopaedic implant associated infections. Staphylococcus spp was the commonest isolate and its ability to produce biofilm indicates the need for an appropriate antibiotic policy and screening for MRSA carriers to reduce the infection. Keywords: Orthopaedic implant, Infection, Biofilm, MRSA, ESBL","PeriodicalId":33653,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","volume":"208 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Sciences and Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46347/jmsh.v9i2.23.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Orthopaedic Implant associated infection is the major problem which leads to implant failure and economic burden to the patient. Implant-associated infections are due to the formation of biofilm at the implantation site leading to multidrug resistant organism. Aim: This study was done to evaluate the causative organisms, their antibiotic sensitivity pattern and their ability to form biofilm over the Implants used in Orthopaedic surgeries. Material and methods: This study was carried out in the department of Microbiology, Adichunchanagiri institute of Medical sciences from September 2019 to August 2022. Swabs from 100 patients who had undergone orthopaedic implant or prosthetic surgery and presented with signs and symptoms of infection were collected and processed as per standard procedures. All the isolates were subjected to detect biofilm production by Congo red agar method, MRSA detection by Cefoxitin disc diffusion test, vancomycin resistant Enterococcus by using Vancomycin (Minimum inhibitory concentration) MIC strips and Extended spectrum β lactamases (ESBL) production by phenotypic confirmatory combined-disc test. Results: Out of the 100 samples processed, culture positivity was observed in 72 specimens. Among them, Staphylococcus aureus 19(26%) was the predominant isolate and 44 (61%) are biofilm producers. 17 (89%) were MRSA (Methicillin resistance Staphylococcus aureus) strains and 15(37%) were ESBL producing strains. Conclusion: The appropriate pre- and post- operative care should be taken to prevent orthopaedic implant associated infections. Staphylococcus spp was the commonest isolate and its ability to produce biofilm indicates the need for an appropriate antibiotic policy and screening for MRSA carriers to reduce the infection. Keywords: Orthopaedic implant, Infection, Biofilm, MRSA, ESBL
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨科植入物相关感染临床分离株生物膜生成及抗生素耐药模式的检测
骨科种植体相关感染是导致种植体失败和患者经济负担的主要问题。植入物相关感染是由于在植入部位形成生物膜导致多重耐药生物。目的:本研究旨在评估骨科手术中植入物的病原菌及其对抗生素的敏感性及其在植入物表面形成生物膜的能力。材料与方法:本研究于2019年9月至2022年8月在Adichunchanagiri医学科学研究所微生物学系进行。收集100例接受骨科植入物或假体手术并出现感染体征和症状的患者拭子,按标准程序进行处理。采用金果红琼脂法检测生物膜的产生,头孢西丁圆盘扩散试验检测MRSA,万古霉素(最低抑制浓度)MIC条检测耐万古霉素肠球菌,表型验证联合圆盘试验检测扩展谱β内酰胺酶(ESBL)的产生。结果:100份标本中,72份标本培养阳性。其中,金黄色葡萄球菌19(26%)为优势菌株,44(61%)为生物膜产生菌。耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA) 17株(89%),产ESBL 15株(37%)。结论:应采取适当的术前和术后护理,预防骨科种植体相关感染。葡萄球菌是最常见的分离物,其产生生物膜的能力表明需要适当的抗生素政策和筛选MRSA携带者以减少感染。关键词:骨科植入物,感染,生物膜,MRSA, ESBL
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
COVID-19 Vaccination-Associated Spontaneous Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Syndrome A Cross-sectional Observational Study of the Etio-pathology, Socioeconomic Distribution and Clinical Pictures of Ectopic Pregnancy in a Tertiary Medical College and Hospital in Bankura, West Bengal, India Pattern of Thyroid Dysfunction in Type II Diabetes Mellitus Patients in a Tertiary Care Center: A Cross-Sectional Study Clinical Profile of Anterior Uveitis in Tertiary Eye Care Center Ultrasound-Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Intraperitoneal Instillation of Bupivacaine after Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy – A Randomized Control Trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1