S A Adil, Ö Akarsu, M Malekjani, E Ó Colgáin, S Pourojaghi, A A Sen, M M Sheikh-Jabbari
{"title":"<i>S</i> 8 increases with effective redshift in ΛCDM cosmology","authors":"S A Adil, Ö Akarsu, M Malekjani, E Ó Colgáin, S Pourojaghi, A A Sen, M M Sheikh-Jabbari","doi":"10.1093/mnrasl/slad165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Hubble constant H0 and weighted amplitude of matter fluctuations S8 determinations are biased to higher and lower values, respectively, in the late Universe with respect to early Universe values inferred by the Planck collaboration within flat ΛCDM cosmology. If these anomalies are physical, i.e. not due to systematics, they naively suggest that H0 decreases and S8 increases with effective redshift. Here, subjecting matter density today Ωm to a prior, corresponding to a combination of Planck CMB and BAO data, we perform a consistency test of the Planck-ΛCDM cosmology and show that S8 determinations from fσ8(z) constraints increase with effective redshift. Due to the redshift evolution, a ∼3σ tension in the S8 parameter with Planck at lower redshifts remarkably becomes consistent with Planck within 1σ at high redshifts. This provides corroborating support for an S8 discrepancy that is physical in origin. We further confirm that the flat ΛCDM model is preferred over a theoretically ad hoc model with a jump in S8 at a given redshift. In the absence of the CMB+BAO Ωm prior, we find that &gt;3σ tensions with Planck in low redshift data are ameliorated by shifts in the parameters in high redshift data. Results here and elsewhere suggest that the ΛCDM cosmological parameters are redshift dependent. Fitting parameters that evolve with redshift is a recognisable hallmark of model breakdown.","PeriodicalId":18951,"journal":{"name":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","volume":"7 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slad165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Abstract Hubble constant H0 and weighted amplitude of matter fluctuations S8 determinations are biased to higher and lower values, respectively, in the late Universe with respect to early Universe values inferred by the Planck collaboration within flat ΛCDM cosmology. If these anomalies are physical, i.e. not due to systematics, they naively suggest that H0 decreases and S8 increases with effective redshift. Here, subjecting matter density today Ωm to a prior, corresponding to a combination of Planck CMB and BAO data, we perform a consistency test of the Planck-ΛCDM cosmology and show that S8 determinations from fσ8(z) constraints increase with effective redshift. Due to the redshift evolution, a ∼3σ tension in the S8 parameter with Planck at lower redshifts remarkably becomes consistent with Planck within 1σ at high redshifts. This provides corroborating support for an S8 discrepancy that is physical in origin. We further confirm that the flat ΛCDM model is preferred over a theoretically ad hoc model with a jump in S8 at a given redshift. In the absence of the CMB+BAO Ωm prior, we find that >3σ tensions with Planck in low redshift data are ameliorated by shifts in the parameters in high redshift data. Results here and elsewhere suggest that the ΛCDM cosmological parameters are redshift dependent. Fitting parameters that evolve with redshift is a recognisable hallmark of model breakdown.
期刊介绍:
For papers that merit urgent publication, MNRAS Letters, the online section of Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, publishes short, topical and significant research in all fields of astronomy. Letters should be self-contained and describe the results of an original study whose rapid publication might be expected to have a significant influence on the subsequent development of research in the associated subject area. The 5-page limit must be respected. Authors are required to state their reasons for seeking publication in the form of a Letter when submitting their manuscript.