Pain outcome of non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease using patient-reported pain outcome instruments

IF 0.8 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.25259/jnrp_80_2022
Moses Osaodion Inojie, Chika Anele Ndubuisi, Okwuoma Okwunodulu, Okiemute Vanita Inojie, Ned Micheal Ndafia, Samuel Chwukwunoyerem Ohaegbulam
{"title":"Pain outcome of non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery for degenerative lumbar spine disease using patient-reported pain outcome instruments","authors":"Moses Osaodion Inojie, Chika Anele Ndubuisi, Okwuoma Okwunodulu, Okiemute Vanita Inojie, Ned Micheal Ndafia, Samuel Chwukwunoyerem Ohaegbulam","doi":"10.25259/jnrp_80_2022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: A clinical disorder known as degenerative lumbar spine disease (DLSD) is characterized by persistent low back pain (LBP) coupled with radiculopathy and other signs of neurologic impairment. Using patient-reported pain outcome assessment tools, this study evaluated the pain outcome of non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery for DLSD. Materials and Methods: A prospective longitudinal research was conducted. Using the metric visual analog scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI), consenting patients who underwent non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery for symptomatic DLSD were evaluated for radicular pain and LBP. The evaluation was conducted both immediately before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Data generated by comparing the pre-operative and post-operative VAS and ODI scores were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Sixty-seven patients in total completed the study. Thirty-six (54%) males and 31 (46%) females, with a mean age and body mass index of 55.28 years and 29.5 k/m 2 , respectively. At 6 months postoperatively, there was significant pain reduction from the pre-operative baseline VAS for LBP (67.12–32.74) with P < 0.001, VAS for radicular pain (75.39–32.75) with P < 0.001, and ODI (65.30–27.66) with P < 0.001. There was a greater decrease in radicular pain than in LBP following lumbar decompressive only surgery ( P = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic DLSD and high pre-operative back pain scores without considerable listhesis should anticipate a significant reduction in radicular and back pain intensity, as well as pain-related functional disability, 6 months after non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery.","PeriodicalId":16443,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","volume":"16 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurosciences in Rural Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/jnrp_80_2022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: A clinical disorder known as degenerative lumbar spine disease (DLSD) is characterized by persistent low back pain (LBP) coupled with radiculopathy and other signs of neurologic impairment. Using patient-reported pain outcome assessment tools, this study evaluated the pain outcome of non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery for DLSD. Materials and Methods: A prospective longitudinal research was conducted. Using the metric visual analog scale (VAS) score and the Oswestry disability index (ODI), consenting patients who underwent non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery for symptomatic DLSD were evaluated for radicular pain and LBP. The evaluation was conducted both immediately before surgery and 6 months after surgery. Data generated by comparing the pre-operative and post-operative VAS and ODI scores were then analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Results: Sixty-seven patients in total completed the study. Thirty-six (54%) males and 31 (46%) females, with a mean age and body mass index of 55.28 years and 29.5 k/m 2 , respectively. At 6 months postoperatively, there was significant pain reduction from the pre-operative baseline VAS for LBP (67.12–32.74) with P < 0.001, VAS for radicular pain (75.39–32.75) with P < 0.001, and ODI (65.30–27.66) with P < 0.001. There was a greater decrease in radicular pain than in LBP following lumbar decompressive only surgery ( P = 0.03). Conclusion: Patients with symptomatic DLSD and high pre-operative back pain scores without considerable listhesis should anticipate a significant reduction in radicular and back pain intensity, as well as pain-related functional disability, 6 months after non-instrumented lumbar decompressive surgery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用患者报告的疼痛结果器械治疗退行性腰椎疾病的非器械腰椎减压手术的疼痛结果
目的:一种被称为退行性腰椎疾病(DLSD)的临床疾病,其特征是持续的腰痛(LBP),并伴有神经根病和其他神经系统损伤的迹象。使用患者报告的疼痛结果评估工具,本研究评估了无器械腰椎减压手术治疗DLSD的疼痛结果。材料与方法:前瞻性纵向研究。采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),对接受无器械腰椎减压手术治疗症状性DLSD的患者进行神经根痛和腰痛评估。术前和术后6个月均进行评估。通过比较术前和术后VAS和ODI评分产生的数据,然后使用描述性和推断性统计进行分析。结果:共67例患者完成了研究。男性36例(54%),女性31例(46%),平均年龄55.28岁,体重指数29.5 k/ m2。术后6个月,腰痛VAS基线评分(67.12-32.74)较术前显著减轻,P <0.001,神经根痛VAS评分(75.39 ~ 32.75),P <ODI (65.30 ~ 27.66), P <0.001. 单纯腰椎减压手术后神经根痛的减轻程度大于腰痛(P = 0.03)。结论:无器械腰椎减压手术6个月后,有症状性DLSD和术前背痛评分高且无明显脱臼的患者,神经根和背部疼痛强度以及疼痛相关功能障碍均可显著降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
129
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Cerebral microbleeds: Causes, clinical relevance, and imaging approach - A narrative review. Erratum: A case of anterior cerebral artery A1 segment hypoplasia syndrome presenting with right lower limb monoplegia, abulia, and urinary incontinence. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in immunocompromised children - A single-center study from South India. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy associated with rituximab treatment. Transcranial direct current stimulation-efficacy in mild cognitive impairment: A meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1