Thomas Lesaffre, Antoine Pestre, Eleonore Riber, Bénédicte Cuenot
{"title":"Correction Methods for Exchange Source Terms in Unstructured Euler-Lagrange Solvers with Point-Source Approximation","authors":"Thomas Lesaffre, Antoine Pestre, Eleonore Riber, Bénédicte Cuenot","doi":"10.1007/s10494-023-00487-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper provides a preliminary study of two different methods to handle the limitations of the Lagrangian point-force approach in the context of unstructured LES solvers. Large deviations in mass, momentum, and energy exchanges between the gas and liquid phases may occur if the assumptions of the point-force approach are not verified. In particular, the point-force approach considers the particles to be subgrid-scale phenomena but the use of more and more refined grids for the carrier flow allowed by today’s computer power leads to cell sizes of the order or smaller than the particle diameters. Several methods are found in the literature to tackle this problem. However, they are usually suited for structured solvers. In the case of unstructured solvers handling several hundred thousand particles in unsteady flows, such methods are far too expensive. In this work, two original methods adapted for spray calculation in unstructured solvers are implemented and compared: the particle-bursting method, and the multigrid method. In this preliminary study, only the correction on the evaporation model is studied, with drag being neglected. Both methods greatly improve the accuracy of the evaporation model but only the multigrid method is independent of the Eulerian mesh refinement. The results presented show that the two methods are relevant to correct the evaporation source terms when the limits of the point-force model are reached. However, the study should be extended to consider the impact of the methods on the drag model calculation and the effects on the interaction with a reactive gaseous phase.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":559,"journal":{"name":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","volume":"112 3","pages":"831 - 844"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Flow, Turbulence and Combustion","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10494-023-00487-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MECHANICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper provides a preliminary study of two different methods to handle the limitations of the Lagrangian point-force approach in the context of unstructured LES solvers. Large deviations in mass, momentum, and energy exchanges between the gas and liquid phases may occur if the assumptions of the point-force approach are not verified. In particular, the point-force approach considers the particles to be subgrid-scale phenomena but the use of more and more refined grids for the carrier flow allowed by today’s computer power leads to cell sizes of the order or smaller than the particle diameters. Several methods are found in the literature to tackle this problem. However, they are usually suited for structured solvers. In the case of unstructured solvers handling several hundred thousand particles in unsteady flows, such methods are far too expensive. In this work, two original methods adapted for spray calculation in unstructured solvers are implemented and compared: the particle-bursting method, and the multigrid method. In this preliminary study, only the correction on the evaporation model is studied, with drag being neglected. Both methods greatly improve the accuracy of the evaporation model but only the multigrid method is independent of the Eulerian mesh refinement. The results presented show that the two methods are relevant to correct the evaporation source terms when the limits of the point-force model are reached. However, the study should be extended to consider the impact of the methods on the drag model calculation and the effects on the interaction with a reactive gaseous phase.
本文初步研究了在非结构化 LES 求解器中处理拉格朗日点力方法局限性的两种不同方法。如果不验证点力方法的假设,气相和液相之间的质量、动量和能量交换可能会出现较大偏差。特别是,点力方法认为粒子是亚网格尺度的现象,但在当今计算机能力允许的情况下,载流子流动使用的网格越来越精细,导致单元尺寸达到或小于粒子直径的数量级。文献中有几种方法可以解决这个问题。不过,这些方法通常适用于结构化求解器。对于在非稳定流中处理几十万个粒子的非结构化求解器来说,这些方法过于昂贵。在这项工作中,我们实施并比较了两种适用于非结构化求解器中喷雾计算的原始方法:粒子爆发法和多网格法。在这项初步研究中,只研究了对蒸发模型的修正,而忽略了阻力。两种方法都极大地提高了蒸发模型的精度,但只有多网格法与欧拉网格细化无关。研究结果表明,当达到点力模型的极限时,这两种方法都可以修正蒸发源项。不过,这项研究还应扩展到考虑这两种方法对阻力模型计算的影响,以及对与反应气相相互作用的影响。
期刊介绍:
Flow, Turbulence and Combustion provides a global forum for the publication of original and innovative research results that contribute to the solution of fundamental and applied problems encountered in single-phase, multi-phase and reacting flows, in both idealized and real systems. The scope of coverage encompasses topics in fluid dynamics, scalar transport, multi-physics interactions and flow control. From time to time the journal publishes Special or Theme Issues featuring invited articles.
Contributions may report research that falls within the broad spectrum of analytical, computational and experimental methods. This includes research conducted in academia, industry and a variety of environmental and geophysical sectors. Turbulence, transition and associated phenomena are expected to play a significant role in the majority of studies reported, although non-turbulent flows, typical of those in micro-devices, would be regarded as falling within the scope covered. The emphasis is on originality, timeliness, quality and thematic fit, as exemplified by the title of the journal and the qualifications described above. Relevance to real-world problems and industrial applications are regarded as strengths.