Relationship of functional movement screening with balance and flexibility in adult nonathletes—an observational study

Charuhasini Mahapatra, Joseph Oliver Raj Alexander
{"title":"Relationship of functional movement screening with balance and flexibility in adult nonathletes—an observational study","authors":"Charuhasini Mahapatra, Joseph Oliver Raj Alexander","doi":"10.1186/s43161-023-00151-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background The functional movement screening (FMS), Flamingo balance, Y balance, and sit and reach tests are the screening tools for fundamental movement patterns, balance, and flexibility, respectively; the latter three tests are components of quantifying fitness levels. Functional movement screening is used to measure the quality of movement, and it is an injury risk predictor. There are several studies done to find the correlation between functional movement screening and fitness parameters in athletes but has not been studied much in non-athlete population. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between functional movement screening with static and dynamic balance and flexibility in healthy adult nonathletes, and to find gender differences, if any. Method A total of 65 healthy nonathletes in the age group 18 to 27 years were included in the study based on the selection criteria. The functional movement screening, Y-balance test, Flamingo balance test, and sit and reach test were done for all participants. Results Pearson’s correlation was used to analyze the collected data. The results indicated a poor correlation between FMS and fitness parameters. These are FMS and Y-balance test left and right side ( r = 0.216, 0.144, p = 0.084, 0.251), FMS with Flamingo balance test left and right side ( r = 0.071, 0.197 p = 0.575, 0.115), and FMS with sit and reach test ( r = 0.006, p = 0.961). Conclusion The results showed that functional movement screening and balance (Flamingo and Y balance) and sit and reach cannot be used interchangeably as they do not have any strong correlation. The results of the study also indicate that using only one of the tools cannot predict injury risk in healthy individuals. They have to be used in conjunction with each other.","PeriodicalId":34220,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy","volume":"75 6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Faculty of Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s43161-023-00151-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background The functional movement screening (FMS), Flamingo balance, Y balance, and sit and reach tests are the screening tools for fundamental movement patterns, balance, and flexibility, respectively; the latter three tests are components of quantifying fitness levels. Functional movement screening is used to measure the quality of movement, and it is an injury risk predictor. There are several studies done to find the correlation between functional movement screening and fitness parameters in athletes but has not been studied much in non-athlete population. The aim of this study is to determine the correlation between functional movement screening with static and dynamic balance and flexibility in healthy adult nonathletes, and to find gender differences, if any. Method A total of 65 healthy nonathletes in the age group 18 to 27 years were included in the study based on the selection criteria. The functional movement screening, Y-balance test, Flamingo balance test, and sit and reach test were done for all participants. Results Pearson’s correlation was used to analyze the collected data. The results indicated a poor correlation between FMS and fitness parameters. These are FMS and Y-balance test left and right side ( r = 0.216, 0.144, p = 0.084, 0.251), FMS with Flamingo balance test left and right side ( r = 0.071, 0.197 p = 0.575, 0.115), and FMS with sit and reach test ( r = 0.006, p = 0.961). Conclusion The results showed that functional movement screening and balance (Flamingo and Y balance) and sit and reach cannot be used interchangeably as they do not have any strong correlation. The results of the study also indicate that using only one of the tools cannot predict injury risk in healthy individuals. They have to be used in conjunction with each other.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人非运动员功能运动筛查与平衡和柔韧性的关系——一项观察性研究
功能运动筛查(functional movement screening, FMS)、Flamingo balance、Y平衡和坐下及伸及测试分别是基本运动模式、平衡和柔韧性的筛查工具;后三项测试是量化健康水平的组成部分。功能运动筛查用于衡量运动质量,是一种损伤风险预测指标。已经有一些研究发现功能性运动筛查与运动员体能参数之间的相关性,但对非运动员人群的研究还不多。本研究的目的是确定功能运动筛查与健康成年非运动员静态和动态平衡和柔韧性之间的相关性,并发现性别差异,如果有的话。方法选取年龄在18 ~ 27岁的健康非运动员65例为研究对象。对所有受试者进行功能运动筛查、y型平衡测试、火烈鸟平衡测试、坐及够及测试。结果采用Pearson相关法对收集的资料进行分析。结果表明,FMS与适应度参数的相关性较差。分别是FMS和y -平衡试验左右侧(r = 0.216, 0.144, p = 0.084, 0.251), FMS和Flamingo平衡试验左右侧(r = 0.071, 0.197, p = 0.575, 0.115), FMS和坐下及到达试验(r = 0.006, p = 0.961)。结论功能性运动筛选与平衡(Flamingo和Y平衡)与坐与够不能互换使用,两者之间没有很强的相关性。研究结果还表明,仅使用其中一种工具无法预测健康个体的受伤风险。它们必须相互配合使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rehabilitation program and challenges in managing hospitalized COVID-19 patients: a case series from Egypt Combined effects of functional task training with electrical stimulation on motor abilities and balance in children with diplegia Myoelectrical activity of sternocleidomastoid muscle in smartphone-addicted versus non-addicted individuals Effect of telerehabilitation-based core-stability exercise on pain-related disability, pain self-efficacy, and psychological factors in individuals with non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled study Effect of 8 weeks of cognitive behavioral therapy versus 8 weeks core stabilization training in the management of subjects with non-specific low back pain: a randomized controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1