The Effect of Phosphorus Fertilizer Sources and Lime on Acidic Soil Properties of Mollic Rhodic Nitisol in Welmera District, Central Ethiopia

IF 2.1 Q3 SOIL SCIENCE Applied and Environmental Soil Science Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1155/2023/7002816
Matiyas Dejene, Girma Abera, Temesgen Desalegn
{"title":"The Effect of Phosphorus Fertilizer Sources and Lime on Acidic Soil Properties of Mollic Rhodic Nitisol in Welmera District, Central Ethiopia","authors":"Matiyas Dejene, Girma Abera, Temesgen Desalegn","doi":"10.1155/2023/7002816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The soil acidity problem is intensified by improper utilization of synthetic fertilizers in addition to other naturally existing causes; thus, it is important to consider effects on soil health beyond seasonal crop productivity. Most widely used sources of soluble phosphate fertilizers cannot perform effectively on acidic soil due to its fixation. Field experiments were conducted on the acidic nitisols of Welmera District in two locations to determine the effects of using lime and different phosphorus fertilizer sources on the soil acidity attributes and nutrient use efficiency of barley crops. Treatments include a factorial combination of 4 different phosphate fertilizer sources (PARP, MOHP, NPSB, and NAFAKA) with 2 application rates (34.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 69 kg P2O5 ha−1) and 2 lime application rates computed from soil exchangeable acidity result 404.25 kg·ha−1 and 563.9 kg·ha−1 for on-station and on-farm sites, respectively, with no lime application (1/4th of LR and 0 lime). Partially acidulated rock phosphate as a phosphorus fertilizer significantly improves soil acidity attributes such as exchangeable acidity, present acid saturation, and plant available phosphorus, and also another soil nutrient status is significantly affected by using different phosphorus sources with the lime application. Application of PARP phosphate sources significantly improves soil exchangeable acidity and present acid saturation by 42% and 41%, respectively, over the commonly used NPSB standard sources of phosphorus fertilizer. Using lime with alternative phosphate sources also contributes to more effective nutrient use efficiency and barely yields improvements with a productive acid soil amendment option. Maintaining soil health by using those integrated approaches improves the efficient utilization of scarce unrenewable resources on sustainable bases.","PeriodicalId":38438,"journal":{"name":"Applied and Environmental Soil Science","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied and Environmental Soil Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7002816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOIL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The soil acidity problem is intensified by improper utilization of synthetic fertilizers in addition to other naturally existing causes; thus, it is important to consider effects on soil health beyond seasonal crop productivity. Most widely used sources of soluble phosphate fertilizers cannot perform effectively on acidic soil due to its fixation. Field experiments were conducted on the acidic nitisols of Welmera District in two locations to determine the effects of using lime and different phosphorus fertilizer sources on the soil acidity attributes and nutrient use efficiency of barley crops. Treatments include a factorial combination of 4 different phosphate fertilizer sources (PARP, MOHP, NPSB, and NAFAKA) with 2 application rates (34.5 kg P2O5 ha−1 and 69 kg P2O5 ha−1) and 2 lime application rates computed from soil exchangeable acidity result 404.25 kg·ha−1 and 563.9 kg·ha−1 for on-station and on-farm sites, respectively, with no lime application (1/4th of LR and 0 lime). Partially acidulated rock phosphate as a phosphorus fertilizer significantly improves soil acidity attributes such as exchangeable acidity, present acid saturation, and plant available phosphorus, and also another soil nutrient status is significantly affected by using different phosphorus sources with the lime application. Application of PARP phosphate sources significantly improves soil exchangeable acidity and present acid saturation by 42% and 41%, respectively, over the commonly used NPSB standard sources of phosphorus fertilizer. Using lime with alternative phosphate sources also contributes to more effective nutrient use efficiency and barely yields improvements with a productive acid soil amendment option. Maintaining soil health by using those integrated approaches improves the efficient utilization of scarce unrenewable resources on sustainable bases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
磷肥源和石灰对埃塞俄比亚中部Welmera地区Mollic Rhodic Nitisol酸性土壤性质的影响
土壤酸性问题除了自然存在的其他原因外,还因合成肥料使用不当而加剧;因此,重要的是要考虑季节性作物生产力以外对土壤健康的影响。大多数广泛使用的可溶性磷肥由于其固定作用而不能在酸性土壤上有效地发挥作用。在Welmera地区两个地点的酸性硝土上进行了田间试验,以确定施用石灰和不同磷肥源对大麦作物土壤酸度属性和养分利用效率的影响。处理包括四种不同磷肥源(PARP、MOHP、NPSB和NAFAKA)的因子组合,两种施用量(34.5 kg P2O5 ha - 1和69 kg P2O5 ha - 1)和两种石灰施用量(根据土壤交换酸度计算,站内和农场分别为404.25 kg·ha - 1和563.9 kg·ha - 1),不施用石灰(1/4 LR和0石灰)。部分酸化的磷酸盐岩作为磷肥可以显著改善土壤的酸度属性,如交换性酸度、当前酸饱和度和植物有效磷,并且不同磷源配合石灰施用对土壤的另一营养状况也有显著影响。施用PARP磷肥源可显著提高土壤交换性酸度和当前酸饱和度,分别比常用NPSB标准磷肥源提高42%和41%。使用石灰和替代磷酸盐源也有助于更有效的养分利用效率,几乎没有生产酸性土壤改良剂的改进。通过使用这些综合方法来保持土壤健康,可以在可持续的基础上提高对稀缺的不可再生资源的有效利用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied and Environmental Soil Science
Applied and Environmental Soil Science Earth and Planetary Sciences-Earth-Surface Processes
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.50%
发文量
55
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied and Environmental Soil Science is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes research and review articles in the field of soil science. Its coverage reflects the multidisciplinary nature of soil science, and focuses on studies that take account of the dynamics and spatial heterogeneity of processes in soil. Basic studies of the physical, chemical, biochemical, and biological properties of soil, innovations in soil analysis, and the development of statistical tools will be published. Among the major environmental issues addressed will be: -Pollution by trace elements and nutrients in excess- Climate change and global warming- Soil stability and erosion- Water quality- Quality of agricultural crops- Plant nutrition- Soil hydrology- Biodiversity of soils- Role of micro- and mesofauna in soil
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Health Risks in Wheat Crop Irrigated by Manka Canal, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan Can Soil Compaction Alter Morphophysiological Responses and Soybean Yield under Application of Selective Herbicides? Assessment of Selected Physicochemical Properties of Soils under Different Land Uses and Topographic Positions at Gola Wachu Subwatershed, Eastern Ethiopia Soil Fertility Status as Influenced by Slope Gradient and Land Use Types in Southern Ethiopia Effect of Compost, Blended (NPSZn), and Potassium Chloride Fertilizers on Soil Bulk Density and Moisture Content in Two Soil Textural Groups of Tigray, Northern Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1