Agents, multilateral institutions, and fundamental institutional change in international society: The case of Russia’s peacekeeping policy

IF 2.5 Q1 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS European Journal of International Security Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.1017/eis.2023.22
Takamitsu Hadano
{"title":"Agents, multilateral institutions, and fundamental institutional change in international society: The case of Russia’s peacekeeping policy","authors":"Takamitsu Hadano","doi":"10.1017/eis.2023.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Drawing on recent debates in English School (ES) theory, this article develops an analytical framework for examining how states use multilateral institutions, or what ES theorists call ‘secondary institutions’, to reshape ‘primary institutions’, i.e. fundamental practices in international society. The framework highlights the role of states’ agency in international institutional change by shedding light on strategies that they employ to bring about changes in primary institutions. It posits that, although they can seek to directly remould primary institutions, states in practice often seek to bring about primary institutional changes through existing or newly formed secondary institutions and that this is especially the case at the level of regional international societies (RISs). The article demonstrates the utility of the framework by using it to analyse the case of Russia’s peacekeeping policy in the post-Soviet regional international society (PSRIS), focusing on its efforts to institutionalise the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) as an alternative ‘peacekeeping’ actor.","PeriodicalId":44394,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of International Security","volume":"112 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of International Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/eis.2023.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Drawing on recent debates in English School (ES) theory, this article develops an analytical framework for examining how states use multilateral institutions, or what ES theorists call ‘secondary institutions’, to reshape ‘primary institutions’, i.e. fundamental practices in international society. The framework highlights the role of states’ agency in international institutional change by shedding light on strategies that they employ to bring about changes in primary institutions. It posits that, although they can seek to directly remould primary institutions, states in practice often seek to bring about primary institutional changes through existing or newly formed secondary institutions and that this is especially the case at the level of regional international societies (RISs). The article demonstrates the utility of the framework by using it to analyse the case of Russia’s peacekeeping policy in the post-Soviet regional international society (PSRIS), focusing on its efforts to institutionalise the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) as an alternative ‘peacekeeping’ actor.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际社会中的代理人、多边机构和基本制度变革:以俄罗斯的维和政策为例
摘要:借鉴最近在英国学派(ES)理论中的辩论,本文开发了一个分析框架,用于研究各国如何使用多边机构,或ES理论家所谓的“二级机构”,来重塑“初级机构”,即国际社会的基本实践。该框架强调了国家机构在国际制度变革中的作用,揭示了它们为实现主要制度变革所采用的战略。它认为,尽管各国可以寻求直接改造初级机构,但在实践中,它们往往寻求通过现有的或新成立的二级机构来实现初级机构的变革,这在区域国际社会(RISs)层面上尤其如此。本文通过分析俄罗斯在后苏联地区国际社会(PSRIS)中维持和平政策的案例,展示了该框架的实用性,重点关注其将集体安全条约组织(CSTO)制度化作为另一种“维持和平”行为者的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
13.60%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Transcending the fog of war? US military ‘AI’, vision, and the emergent post-scopic regime Anything you can do [I can do better]: Exploring women’s agency and gendered protection in state militaries Timing bombs and the temporal dynamics of Iranian nuclear security Cyberbiosecurity in the new normal: Cyberbio risks, pre-emptive security, and the global governance of bioinformation The military-strategic rationality of hybrid warfare: Everyday total defence under strategic non-peace in the case of Sweden
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1