Developing a welfare assessment protocol for Australian lot-fed cattle

IF 2.1 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Frontiers in animal science Pub Date : 2023-09-12 DOI:10.3389/fanim.2023.1256670
Emily Taylor, Emma Dunston-Clarke, Daniel Brookes, Ellen Jongman, Benjamin Linn, Anne Barnes, David Miller, Andrew Fisher, Teresa Collins
{"title":"Developing a welfare assessment protocol for Australian lot-fed cattle","authors":"Emily Taylor, Emma Dunston-Clarke, Daniel Brookes, Ellen Jongman, Benjamin Linn, Anne Barnes, David Miller, Andrew Fisher, Teresa Collins","doi":"10.3389/fanim.2023.1256670","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lot feeding of cattle has gained momentum in recent years to improve efficiency in meeting market demands for high quality protein. Concurrently, societal concern for the welfare of animals raised in intensive farming systems has increased. Thus, the reporting of animal health and welfare measures is a key goal for the Australian cattle lot-fed industry. Although feedlots vary in location, climate, capacity, cattle genotype, and feeding programs, many welfare concerns are applicable across the industry. Despite this, no recognised standardised animal welfare assessment protocol exists for the Australian lot-fed industry. This study aimed to identify relevant measures to develop an assessment protocol, by identifying key welfare issues and their relevant measures, considering the validity, reliability, and practicality of each when applied to the feedlot context. An advisory model was derived after reviewing the relevant literature and five international protocols for the assessment of beef cattle (Welfare Quality ® , AssureWel, US Beef Quality Assurance assessment tool, Canadian Feedlot Animal Care Assessment program, and an Australian Live Export industry protocol), followed by stakeholder consultation. A total of 109 measures were evaluated, with 99 environmental-, management-, resource- and animal-based measures being proposed. Piloting of the protocol on commercial feedlots will enable further refinement and validation, to provide an evidence-based, practical protocol to facilitate standardised monitoring of cattle welfare. Such a protocol could promote continued advances in animal welfare at a feedlot level and support a sustainable industry by addressing societal concerns.","PeriodicalId":73064,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in animal science","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in animal science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2023.1256670","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lot feeding of cattle has gained momentum in recent years to improve efficiency in meeting market demands for high quality protein. Concurrently, societal concern for the welfare of animals raised in intensive farming systems has increased. Thus, the reporting of animal health and welfare measures is a key goal for the Australian cattle lot-fed industry. Although feedlots vary in location, climate, capacity, cattle genotype, and feeding programs, many welfare concerns are applicable across the industry. Despite this, no recognised standardised animal welfare assessment protocol exists for the Australian lot-fed industry. This study aimed to identify relevant measures to develop an assessment protocol, by identifying key welfare issues and their relevant measures, considering the validity, reliability, and practicality of each when applied to the feedlot context. An advisory model was derived after reviewing the relevant literature and five international protocols for the assessment of beef cattle (Welfare Quality ® , AssureWel, US Beef Quality Assurance assessment tool, Canadian Feedlot Animal Care Assessment program, and an Australian Live Export industry protocol), followed by stakeholder consultation. A total of 109 measures were evaluated, with 99 environmental-, management-, resource- and animal-based measures being proposed. Piloting of the protocol on commercial feedlots will enable further refinement and validation, to provide an evidence-based, practical protocol to facilitate standardised monitoring of cattle welfare. Such a protocol could promote continued advances in animal welfare at a feedlot level and support a sustainable industry by addressing societal concerns.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
制定澳大利亚放牧牛的福利评估方案
近年来,为了提高效率,满足市场对高品质蛋白质的需求,牛的批量饲养得到了发展。与此同时,社会对集约化养殖系统中饲养的动物福利的关注也在增加。因此,动物健康和福利措施的报告是澳大利亚畜牧业的一个关键目标。尽管饲养场在位置、气候、能力、牛的基因型和喂养计划上各不相同,但许多福利问题在整个行业都是适用的。尽管如此,没有公认的标准化动物福利评估协议存在于澳大利亚的批量饲养行业。本研究旨在通过确定关键福利问题及其相关措施,并考虑每个措施在应用于饲养场环境时的有效性、可靠性和实用性,确定制定评估方案的相关措施。在查阅相关文献和肉牛评估的五项国际协议(福利质量®,AssureWel,美国牛肉质量保证评估工具,加拿大饲养场动物护理评估计划和澳大利亚活体出口行业协议)之后,得出了咨询模型,然后进行了利益相关者咨询。总共评价了109项措施,其中提出了99项基于环境、管理、资源和动物的措施。在商业饲养场试行该协议将有助于进一步完善和验证,从而提供一个以证据为基础的实用协议,促进对牛福利的标准化监测。这样的协议可以促进饲养场层面动物福利的持续进步,并通过解决社会问题来支持可持续发展的行业。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊最新文献
Arterial pCO2 prediction using saphenous pCO2 in healthy mechanically ventilated dogs A systematic review of genotype-by-climate interaction studies in cattle, pigs, and chicken Lucerne meal in the diet of indigenous chickens: a review Assessing body condition scores, weight gain dynamics, and fecal egg counts in feedlot and non-feedlot cattle within high throughput abattoirs of the Eastern Cape Province Comparative study between scan sampling behavioral observations and an automatic monitoring image system on a commercial fattening pig farm
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1