{"title":"Do product returns in the retail sector affect the price level? Evidence from the equation of exchange","authors":"Edoardo Beretta, Doris Neuberger, Richard Senner","doi":"10.1007/s40822-023-00239-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Starting from Irving Fisher’s equation of exchange ( $$MV=PT$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> ) at the basis of the quantity theory of money and mainstream (macro)economics linking money ( $$M$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mi>M</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) and its frequency of circulation ( $$V$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mi>V</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) on the one hand to the general price level ( $$P$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mi>P</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) and real goods and services exchanged ( $$T$$ <mml:math xmlns:mml=\"http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML\"> <mml:mi>T</mml:mi> </mml:math> ) on the other, we analyze whether product returns by consumers (reaching 16.5% of total US sales in 2022) affect macroeconomic variables such as the price level and the velocity of money. We explore two different product-return scenarios: (1) reselling, and (2) destroying returned items. Based on a theoretical analysis and data for the US, we find that reselling product returns at a discount price reduces the price level, which is however not taken into account in the statistical measurement of the consumer price index. Moreover, the “modern” equation of exchange used in mainstream macroeconomics is an unsuitable instrument to study the effects of product returns on money velocity, because it neglects non-GDP-relevant transactions such as returning and reselling products. This leads to underestimate the actual velocity of money.","PeriodicalId":45064,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Economic Review","volume":"126 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40822-023-00239-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Starting from Irving Fisher’s equation of exchange ( $$MV=PT$$ MV=PT ) at the basis of the quantity theory of money and mainstream (macro)economics linking money ( $$M$$ M ) and its frequency of circulation ( $$V$$ V ) on the one hand to the general price level ( $$P$$ P ) and real goods and services exchanged ( $$T$$ T ) on the other, we analyze whether product returns by consumers (reaching 16.5% of total US sales in 2022) affect macroeconomic variables such as the price level and the velocity of money. We explore two different product-return scenarios: (1) reselling, and (2) destroying returned items. Based on a theoretical analysis and data for the US, we find that reselling product returns at a discount price reduces the price level, which is however not taken into account in the statistical measurement of the consumer price index. Moreover, the “modern” equation of exchange used in mainstream macroeconomics is an unsuitable instrument to study the effects of product returns on money velocity, because it neglects non-GDP-relevant transactions such as returning and reselling products. This leads to underestimate the actual velocity of money.
摘要在货币数量理论和主流(宏观)经济学将货币($$M$$ M)及其流通频率($$V$$ V)与一般价格水平($$P$$ P)和实际交换的商品和服务($$T$$ T)联系起来的基础上,从欧文·费雪的交换方程($$MV=PT$$ M V = P T)出发,分析消费者是否会获得产品回报(达到16.5)% of total US sales in 2022) affect macroeconomic variables such as the price level and the velocity of money. We explore two different product-return scenarios: (1) reselling, and (2) destroying returned items. Based on a theoretical analysis and data for the US, we find that reselling product returns at a discount price reduces the price level, which is however not taken into account in the statistical measurement of the consumer price index. Moreover, the “modern” equation of exchange used in mainstream macroeconomics is an unsuitable instrument to study the effects of product returns on money velocity, because it neglects non-GDP-relevant transactions such as returning and reselling products. This leads to underestimate the actual velocity of money.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Eurasian Economic Review is to publish peer-reviewed empirical research papers that test, extend, or build theory and contribute to practice. All empirical methods - including, but not limited to, qualitative, quantitative, field, laboratory, and any combination of methods - are welcome. Empirical, theoretical and methodological articles from all fields of finance and applied macroeconomics are featured in the journal. Theoretical and/or review articles that integrate existing bodies of research and that provide new insights into the field are highly encouraged. The journal has a broad scope, addressing such issues as: financial systems and regulation, corporate and start-up finance, macro and sustainable finance, finance and innovation, consumer finance, public policies on financial markets within local, regional, national and international contexts, money and banking, and the interface of labor and financial economics. The macroeconomics coverage includes topics from monetary economics, labor economics, international economics and development economics.
Eurasian Economic Review is published quarterly. To be published in Eurasian Economic Review, a manuscript must make strong empirical and/or theoretical contributions and highlight the significance of those contributions to our field. Consequently, preference is given to submissions that test, extend, or build strong theoretical frameworks while empirically examining issues with high importance for theory and practice. Eurasian Economic Review is not tied to any national context. Although it focuses on Europe and Asia, all papers from related fields on any region or country are highly encouraged. Single country studies, cross-country or regional studies can be submitted.