PERCEPTIONS OF PRIMARY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN THE UTILIZATION OF PLANT IDENTIFICATION APPS AS EDUCATIONAL TOOLS

IF 1.1 4区 教育学 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Baltic Science Education Pub Date : 2023-10-18 DOI:10.33225/jbse/23.22.799
Peter Paul Canuto
{"title":"PERCEPTIONS OF PRIMARY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS IN THE UTILIZATION OF PLANT IDENTIFICATION APPS AS EDUCATIONAL TOOLS","authors":"Peter Paul Canuto","doi":"10.33225/jbse/23.22.799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Plant identification apps make learning about plants more convenient. This study explored the participants' perceptions of using three plant identification apps, PlantNet, PictureThis, and LeafSnap, as potential educational tools. Problems experienced, differences in perceptions, and the participants' most preferred apps were also determined. Through purposive sampling, the study engaged 162 primary pre-service teachers in the Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR), Philippines. Data were collected through a developed questionnaire and analysed quantitatively. The questionnaire was reliable with an identified single component for perception. Participants first explored and used the apps to identify local plants, thereafter, responding through an online questionnaire. Results showed that participants strongly perceived the apps as engaging, helpful in plant identification, easy to browse, providing details, effective as emerging tools, and significant for scientific literacy, except for consistency of results. There were significant differences, but with small effect sizes, indicating negligible differences in the perceptions of male and female participants regarding the apps' consistency of results and effectiveness. Weak internet connection was the primary issue affecting the apps' utilization. The pre-service teachers preferred LeafSnap over PictureThis and PlantNet. Conclusively, this study affirmed the potential of the apps for students learning about plants, further supporting their feasibility as emerging educational tools. Keywords: educational tools, plant identification apps, PlantNet, PictureThis, LeafSnap, primary pre-service teachers","PeriodicalId":46424,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Baltic Science Education","volume":"144 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Baltic Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33225/jbse/23.22.799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Plant identification apps make learning about plants more convenient. This study explored the participants' perceptions of using three plant identification apps, PlantNet, PictureThis, and LeafSnap, as potential educational tools. Problems experienced, differences in perceptions, and the participants' most preferred apps were also determined. Through purposive sampling, the study engaged 162 primary pre-service teachers in the Cordillera Administrative Region (CAR), Philippines. Data were collected through a developed questionnaire and analysed quantitatively. The questionnaire was reliable with an identified single component for perception. Participants first explored and used the apps to identify local plants, thereafter, responding through an online questionnaire. Results showed that participants strongly perceived the apps as engaging, helpful in plant identification, easy to browse, providing details, effective as emerging tools, and significant for scientific literacy, except for consistency of results. There were significant differences, but with small effect sizes, indicating negligible differences in the perceptions of male and female participants regarding the apps' consistency of results and effectiveness. Weak internet connection was the primary issue affecting the apps' utilization. The pre-service teachers preferred LeafSnap over PictureThis and PlantNet. Conclusively, this study affirmed the potential of the apps for students learning about plants, further supporting their feasibility as emerging educational tools. Keywords: educational tools, plant identification apps, PlantNet, PictureThis, LeafSnap, primary pre-service teachers
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
初级职前教师使用植物识别应用程序作为教育工具的看法
植物识别应用程序使了解植物更加方便。这项研究探讨了参与者对使用三种植物识别应用程序(PlantNet、PictureThis和LeafSnap)作为潜在教育工具的看法。还确定了所遇到的问题、看法的差异以及参与者最喜欢的应用程序。本研究以菲律宾科迪勒拉行政区(CAR) 162名小学职前教师为对象,进行有目的的抽样调查。通过编制问卷收集数据并进行定量分析。问卷是可靠的,有一个确定的单一成分的感知。参与者首先探索并使用这些应用程序来识别当地的植物,然后通过在线问卷进行回答。结果显示,除了结果的一致性外,参与者强烈认为这些应用程序具有吸引力,有助于植物识别,易于浏览,提供详细信息,作为新兴工具有效,对科学素养具有重要意义。有显著的差异,但效应大小很小,表明男性和女性参与者对应用程序结果一致性和有效性的看法差异可以忽略不计。网络连接薄弱是影响应用程序使用的主要问题。职前教师更喜欢LeafSnap,而不是PictureThis和PlantNet。最后,本研究肯定了这些应用程序在学生学习植物方面的潜力,进一步支持了它们作为新兴教育工具的可行性。关键词:教育工具,植物识别应用,PlantNet, PictureThis, LeafSnap,小学职前教师
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Baltic Science Education
Journal of Baltic Science Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
8.30%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
LEARNING STYLES OF A STORY ABOUT SUSTAINABILITY: THEIR EFFECT ON THE LEVEL OF QUESTIONING OF STUDENTS IN PRIMARY EDUCATION MODERATING ROLE OF SCIENCE SELF-CONCEPT IN ELICITING STATE CURIOSITY WHEN CONFRONTING A VIOLATION OUTCOME IMPROVING LOWER SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ KNOWLEDGE INTEGRATION OF BUOYANCY THROUGH ENHANCING THEIR UNDERSTANDING OF THE NATURE OF BUOYANCY BREAKING GENDER STEREOTYPES: HOW INTERACTING WITH STEM PROFESSIONALS CHANGED FEMALE STUDENTS' PERCEPTIONS EFFECTS OF MULTIMEDIA APPLICATION ON STUDENTS’ ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT IN AGRICULTURAL SCIENCE
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1