Assessment of Efficacy and Safety Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines: A Questionnaire Based Cross-Sectional Study

Sri Jahnavi Adusumilli, Hari Sai Gnana Lakshmi Gadu, Devi Priyanka Marni, Sri Raghu Bapiraju Mudunuri
{"title":"Assessment of Efficacy and Safety Associated with COVID-19 Vaccines: A Questionnaire Based Cross-Sectional Study","authors":"Sri Jahnavi Adusumilli, Hari Sai Gnana Lakshmi Gadu, Devi Priyanka Marni, Sri Raghu Bapiraju Mudunuri","doi":"10.5530/ijopp.16.4.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different COVID-19 vaccines approved by CDSCO. The aim is to assess the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines through a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The Cross-Sectional Observational study has been carried out through a questionnaire-based survey followed by a telephonic interview. Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism version 9.3.1 were accessed to examine the statistics. Chi-square, Kruskal-Walli’s, and Mann-Whitney tests were accessed to assess the effect of categorical variables, one independent variable on two or more dependent variables, and 2 independent groups respectively. Results: Significant difference seen between marital status and COVID infection status, age, and vaccination status. The older the age, number of vaccines taken increases. Significant differences were seen between age and severity of side effects. High-age people have less severe side effects. Vaccinated people were less infected with COVID-19 infection. Significant differences were seen between age and Covid infection status. Low-age people were less infected. Conclusion: In our study, 37.38% weren’t infected. Among the infected 65.69% were before vaccination, 10.51% after the first dose and before the second dose, 20.22% after the second dose, 1.94% after the booster dose, and 1.61% both before and after vaccination. 41.86% experienced side effects like fever, pain at the injection site, body pains, and headache. Side effects being temporary only a few had to stop by a physician or taken to the infirmary. So, we conclude COVID-19 vaccines have shown better efficacy and safety. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, AEFIn, CDSCO.","PeriodicalId":13495,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice","volume":"876 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5530/ijopp.16.4.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different COVID-19 vaccines approved by CDSCO. The aim is to assess the safety and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines through a questionnaire-based cross-sectional study. Materials and Methods: The Cross-Sectional Observational study has been carried out through a questionnaire-based survey followed by a telephonic interview. Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism version 9.3.1 were accessed to examine the statistics. Chi-square, Kruskal-Walli’s, and Mann-Whitney tests were accessed to assess the effect of categorical variables, one independent variable on two or more dependent variables, and 2 independent groups respectively. Results: Significant difference seen between marital status and COVID infection status, age, and vaccination status. The older the age, number of vaccines taken increases. Significant differences were seen between age and severity of side effects. High-age people have less severe side effects. Vaccinated people were less infected with COVID-19 infection. Significant differences were seen between age and Covid infection status. Low-age people were less infected. Conclusion: In our study, 37.38% weren’t infected. Among the infected 65.69% were before vaccination, 10.51% after the first dose and before the second dose, 20.22% after the second dose, 1.94% after the booster dose, and 1.61% both before and after vaccination. 41.86% experienced side effects like fever, pain at the injection site, body pains, and headache. Side effects being temporary only a few had to stop by a physician or taken to the infirmary. So, we conclude COVID-19 vaccines have shown better efficacy and safety. Keywords: SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, AEFIn, CDSCO.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19疫苗的有效性和安全性评估:基于问卷的横断面研究
摘要:目的:评价CDSCO批准的不同新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。目的是通过基于问卷的横断面研究评估COVID-19疫苗的安全性和有效性。材料和方法:横断面观察研究是通过问卷调查和电话访谈进行的。使用Microsoft Excel和GraphPad Prism 9.3.1版本进行统计分析。分别采用卡方检验、Kruskal-Walli检验和Mann-Whitney检验来评估分类变量、一个自变量对两个或多个因变量和2个独立组的影响。结果:婚姻状况与COVID感染状况、年龄、疫苗接种状况存在显著性差异。年龄越大,接种疫苗的数量就会增加。年龄和副作用严重程度之间存在显著差异。老年人的副作用较小。接种疫苗的人感染COVID-19的几率较低。年龄和感染状况之间存在显著差异。低龄人群感染较少。结论:本组37.38%的患者未感染。其中,65.69%的感染者在接种疫苗前感染,10.51%的感染者在接种第一针和第二针后感染,20.22%的感染者在接种第二针后感染,1.94%的感染者在接种加强针后感染,1.61%的感染者在接种前后感染。41.86%的人出现了发烧、注射部位疼痛、身体疼痛和头痛等副作用。副作用是暂时的,只有少数人不得不停下来看医生或被送到医务室。因此,我们认为COVID-19疫苗具有更好的有效性和安全性。关键词:SARS-CoV-2, COVID-19, AEFIn, CDSCO
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Infection-Related Glomerular Nephritis: Understanding the Kidney's Immune Battle Translation and Validation of Medical Outcome of Study (MOS) of Short Form Health Survey SF-36 in Hindi Study on Drug Utilisation in Medicine Department Under National Health Scheme of Ayushman Bharath Arogya Karnataka in Tertiary Care Teaching Hospital Prospective Observational Study of Chronic Kidney Disease, its Prescription Pattern and Risk Factors in Patients with Pre-Existing Comorbidities in Tertiary Care Hospital Chronic Calcific Pancreatitis, Type IIIc Diabetes Mellitus: A Case Report from Chennai, India
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1