Use of exercise tests in screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review

Sarah Madigan, Susanna Proudman, David Schembri, Huw Davies, Robert Adams
{"title":"Use of exercise tests in screening for pulmonary arterial hypertension in systemic sclerosis: A systematic literature review","authors":"Sarah Madigan, Susanna Proudman, David Schembri, Huw Davies, Robert Adams","doi":"10.1177/23971983231199148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and objective: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have a poor prognosis, accounting for 30% of all SSc-related deaths. Guidelines recommend annual screening for PAH regardless of symptoms, as early treatment improves outcomes. Current protocols include combinations of clinical features, biomarkers, pulmonary function tests, and echocardiography. None include exercise testing, although early-stage PAH may only be evident during exercise. This systematic review assessed the performance of exercise tests in predicting the presence of PAH in patients with SSc, where PAH was confirmed through right heart catheterisation (RHC). Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to May 2023. Articles were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Eligibility criteria included the use of a non-invasive exercise test to screen adult patients to detect PAH in a population without a previous diagnosis of PAH, with diagnosis confirmed by RHC. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, describing at least one of three different non-invasive exercise tests: cardiopulmonary exercise test, six-minute walk test and stress Doppler echocardiography. All studies found that exercise tests had some ability to predict the presence of PAH, with sensitivity between 50% and 100% and specificity from 73% to 91%. Conclusion: Exercise tests are infrequently used for screening for PAH in SSc but can predict the presence of PAH. More data are required to establish which tests are most effective.","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983231199148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) have a poor prognosis, accounting for 30% of all SSc-related deaths. Guidelines recommend annual screening for PAH regardless of symptoms, as early treatment improves outcomes. Current protocols include combinations of clinical features, biomarkers, pulmonary function tests, and echocardiography. None include exercise testing, although early-stage PAH may only be evident during exercise. This systematic review assessed the performance of exercise tests in predicting the presence of PAH in patients with SSc, where PAH was confirmed through right heart catheterisation (RHC). Methods: Comprehensive literature searches were performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trails, CINAHL, Scopus and Web of Science from inception to May 2023. Articles were screened for eligibility by two independent reviewers. Eligibility criteria included the use of a non-invasive exercise test to screen adult patients to detect PAH in a population without a previous diagnosis of PAH, with diagnosis confirmed by RHC. Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, describing at least one of three different non-invasive exercise tests: cardiopulmonary exercise test, six-minute walk test and stress Doppler echocardiography. All studies found that exercise tests had some ability to predict the presence of PAH, with sensitivity between 50% and 100% and specificity from 73% to 91%. Conclusion: Exercise tests are infrequently used for screening for PAH in SSc but can predict the presence of PAH. More data are required to establish which tests are most effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动试验在系统性硬化症肺动脉高压筛查中的应用:系统文献综述
背景与目的:系统性硬化症(SSc)合并肺动脉高压(PAH)患者预后较差,占所有SSc相关死亡的30%。指南建议不论症状如何,每年对多环芳烃进行筛查,因为早期治疗可以改善结果。目前的方案包括临床特征、生物标志物、肺功能检查和超声心动图的组合。没有一个包括运动测试,尽管早期的多环芳烃可能只在运动中表现明显。本系统综述评估了运动试验在预测SSc患者PAH存在方面的表现,其中PAH通过右心导管(RHC)确诊。方法:采用MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane系统评价数据库和Cochrane中央对照试验注册库、CINAHL、Scopus和Web of Science等数据库进行综合文献检索,检索时间为自成立至2023年5月。文章由两名独立审稿人进行筛选。资格标准包括使用无创运动试验筛查成人患者,以检测既往无PAH诊断的人群,并通过RHC确诊。结果:8项研究符合纳入标准,描述了三种不同的非侵入性运动试验中的至少一种:心肺运动试验、6分钟步行试验和应激多普勒超声心动图。所有的研究都发现,运动试验有一定的预测多环芳烃存在的能力,敏感性在50%到100%之间,特异性在73%到91%之间。结论:运动试验很少用于SSc的PAH筛查,但可以预测PAH的存在。需要更多的数据来确定哪些测试最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Atypical morphoea, a herald of two malignancies: Lung adenocarcinoma and a neuroendocrine tumour. Changes in work and adequacy of financial resources during COVID-19 among people with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network study. Coronary artery calcification is prevalent in systemic sclerosis and is associated with adverse prognosis. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is associated with pulmonary hypertension or diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis: An Australian prospective cross-sectional study. Views of nutrition needs in patients with systemic sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1