Who Is Responsible for Nurse Wellbeing in a Crisis? A Single Centre Perspective

Psych Pub Date : 2023-06-24 DOI:10.3390/psych5030041
Luke Hughes, Anika Petrella, Lorna A Fern, Rachel M Taylor
{"title":"Who Is Responsible for Nurse Wellbeing in a Crisis? A Single Centre Perspective","authors":"Luke Hughes, Anika Petrella, Lorna A Fern, Rachel M Taylor","doi":"10.3390/psych5030041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic often manifested as a command-and-control style of leadership which had detrimental emotional impacts on staff, particularly the nursing workforce. Leadership can have detrimental effects on staff wellbeing, or it can greatly boost their ability to handle a crisis. We sought to explore the interrelationship between leadership and nurses’ wellbeing in an inner-city university hospital during the initial wave of the pandemic. Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of interview data collected during a hospital-wide evaluation of barriers and facilitators to changes implemented to support the surge of COVID-19 related admissions during wave one. Data were collected through semi-structured video interviews during May–July 2020. Interviews were analysed using Framework analysis. Results: Thirty-one nurses participated, including matrons (n = 7), sisters (n = 8), and specialist nursing roles (n = 16). Three overarching themes were identified: the impact on nurses, personal factors, and organisational factors. The impact on nurses manifested as distress and fatigue. Coping and help-seeking behaviours were found to be the two personal factors which underpinned nurses’ wellbeing. The organisational factors that impacted nurses’ wellbeing included decision-making, duty, and teamwork. Conclusions: The wellbeing of the workforce is pivotal to the health service, and it is mutually beneficial for patients, staff, and leaders. Addressing how beliefs and misconceptions around wellbeing are communicated and accessing psychological support are key priorities to supporting nurses during pandemics.","PeriodicalId":93139,"journal":{"name":"Psych","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psych","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/psych5030041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic often manifested as a command-and-control style of leadership which had detrimental emotional impacts on staff, particularly the nursing workforce. Leadership can have detrimental effects on staff wellbeing, or it can greatly boost their ability to handle a crisis. We sought to explore the interrelationship between leadership and nurses’ wellbeing in an inner-city university hospital during the initial wave of the pandemic. Methods: We conducted secondary analyses of interview data collected during a hospital-wide evaluation of barriers and facilitators to changes implemented to support the surge of COVID-19 related admissions during wave one. Data were collected through semi-structured video interviews during May–July 2020. Interviews were analysed using Framework analysis. Results: Thirty-one nurses participated, including matrons (n = 7), sisters (n = 8), and specialist nursing roles (n = 16). Three overarching themes were identified: the impact on nurses, personal factors, and organisational factors. The impact on nurses manifested as distress and fatigue. Coping and help-seeking behaviours were found to be the two personal factors which underpinned nurses’ wellbeing. The organisational factors that impacted nurses’ wellbeing included decision-making, duty, and teamwork. Conclusions: The wellbeing of the workforce is pivotal to the health service, and it is mutually beneficial for patients, staff, and leaders. Addressing how beliefs and misconceptions around wellbeing are communicated and accessing psychological support are key priorities to supporting nurses during pandemics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谁对危机中护士的健康负责?单中心视角
背景:2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的领导往往表现为指挥控制式的领导方式,这对工作人员,特别是护理人员的情绪产生了不利影响。领导力可以对员工的健康产生不利影响,也可以极大地提高他们处理危机的能力。我们试图探索在大流行的最初一波期间,市中心大学医院的领导和护士福祉之间的相互关系。方法:我们对在全医院范围内评估为支持第一波期间COVID-19相关入院人数激增而实施的变革的障碍和促进因素时收集的访谈数据进行了二次分析。在2020年5月至7月期间,通过半结构化视频访谈收集数据。访谈采用框架分析法进行分析。结果:31名护士参与调查,其中护士长(n = 7)、姐妹(n = 8)和专科护理角色(n = 16)。确定了三个总体主题:对护士的影响,个人因素和组织因素。对护士的影响表现为痛苦和疲劳。应对行为和寻求帮助行为是影响护士幸福感的两个个人因素。影响护士幸福感的组织因素包括决策、职责和团队合作。结论:工作人员的福祉对卫生服务至关重要,对患者、工作人员和领导者都是互利的。解决关于健康的信念和误解如何传播以及获得心理支持是在大流行期间支持护士的关键优先事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Robust Indicator Mean-Based Method for Estimating Generalizability Theory Absolute Error and Related Dependability Indices within Structural Equation Modeling Frameworks Qualitative Pilot Interventions for the Enhancement of Mental Health Support in Doctoral Students Walking Forward Together—The Next Step: Indigenous Youth Mental Health and the Climate Crisis Walking Forward Together—The Next Step: Indigenous Youth Mental Health and the Climate Crisis The IADC Grief Questionnaire as a Brief Measure for Complicated Grief in Clinical Practice and Research: A Preliminary Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1