A comparative study of Muenster socket versus split socket with step-up hinge on very short transradial amputees

Rani Kumari
{"title":"A comparative study of Muenster socket versus split socket with step-up hinge on very short transradial amputees","authors":"Rani Kumari","doi":"10.4103/jihs.jihs_21_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Persons with very short transradial stump find extreme difficulty in performing daily routine activities. The Muenster socket prosthesis was compared to split socket with step-up hinge prosthesis in this study, while both the designs were compared in terms of their advantages and functional effects on very short transradial amputees. A goniometer was used for measuring elbow joint range of motion by computing the angle from the axis of the joint for each specific joint, in addition to block box test study and kinetics of prosthesis. In block box test, mild increment with split socket with step-up hinge was observed as compared to the Muenster prosthesis. This may be due to amplification by split socket of the elbow joint motion and speed of the forearm with a terminal device. The statistical analysis of the data revealed that split socket with step-up hinge prosthesis provided better functional control for very short transradial amputees than the Muenster socket prosthesis.","PeriodicalId":30637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Integrated Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jihs.jihs_21_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Persons with very short transradial stump find extreme difficulty in performing daily routine activities. The Muenster socket prosthesis was compared to split socket with step-up hinge prosthesis in this study, while both the designs were compared in terms of their advantages and functional effects on very short transradial amputees. A goniometer was used for measuring elbow joint range of motion by computing the angle from the axis of the joint for each specific joint, in addition to block box test study and kinetics of prosthesis. In block box test, mild increment with split socket with step-up hinge was observed as compared to the Muenster prosthesis. This may be due to amplification by split socket of the elbow joint motion and speed of the forearm with a terminal device. The statistical analysis of the data revealed that split socket with step-up hinge prosthesis provided better functional control for very short transradial amputees than the Muenster socket prosthesis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
极短经桡骨截肢者明斯特窝与分体式上移铰链窝的比较研究
桡骨外残端非常短的人在进行日常活动时极其困难。在本研究中,我们将Muenster假体与分离式假体和上升式铰链假体进行了比较,并比较了这两种设计在非常短的经桡骨截肢者中的优势和功能效果。除了块盒试验研究和假体动力学外,还使用角计通过计算每个特定关节与关节轴的夹角来测量肘关节的运动范围。在块箱试验中,与Muenster假体相比,采用分体式槽型和上升式铰链的假体有轻微的增加。这可能是由于使用终端装置时肘关节运动和前臂运动速度的扩大。统计分析数据显示,对于极短桡骨截肢患者,裂口式关节窝与提升式关节窝的功能控制优于明斯特关节窝。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Examining the Influence of Joint Commission International (JCI) Accreditation Surveys on Medication Safety Practices: A Cross-Sectional Study from Mediclinic Welcare Hospital in Dubai, UAE The Gift of Life Fever, Significant Pyuria and A Positive Urine Culture not Always A Urine Infection (UTI) Intention to Consume Alcohol among Dayak Adolescents in Sarawak: An Application of Theory of Planned Behavior Paradoxical Hemiparesis from Cerebellopontine Angle Tumor: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1