An Historical Overview of Jewish Theological Responses to Evolution

IF 0.6 4区 哲学 Q2 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE Theology and Science Pub Date : 2023-09-24 DOI:10.1080/14746700.2023.2255948
Daniel Langton
{"title":"An Historical Overview of Jewish Theological Responses to Evolution","authors":"Daniel Langton","doi":"10.1080/14746700.2023.2255948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While a systematic comparison of the similarities and differences between Jewish and Muslim approaches to evolution is beyond the scope of this study, it is possible to note some of the most striking observations. Among the key differences highlighted by an historical perspective on Jewish approaches in the late-nineteenth to present day are the phenomenon of panentheistic tendences among Jewish commentators and the practice of defining the position of Judaism against that of Christianity. In response to Malik’s theological approach, which attempted to identify medieval traditions as potential resources for contemporary Muslim evolutionists, it proved to be an interesting counter-factual exercise to generate a comparable list of pre-modern theological resources for Jewish evolutionists.","PeriodicalId":56045,"journal":{"name":"Theology and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theology and Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2023.2255948","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While a systematic comparison of the similarities and differences between Jewish and Muslim approaches to evolution is beyond the scope of this study, it is possible to note some of the most striking observations. Among the key differences highlighted by an historical perspective on Jewish approaches in the late-nineteenth to present day are the phenomenon of panentheistic tendences among Jewish commentators and the practice of defining the position of Judaism against that of Christianity. In response to Malik’s theological approach, which attempted to identify medieval traditions as potential resources for contemporary Muslim evolutionists, it proved to be an interesting counter-factual exercise to generate a comparable list of pre-modern theological resources for Jewish evolutionists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犹太神学对进化论反应的历史概述
虽然系统地比较犹太人和穆斯林对进化的看法的异同超出了本研究的范围,但有可能注意到一些最引人注目的观察结果。从历史的角度来看,19世纪末至今,犹太人的观点突出了关键的不同之处,其中包括犹太评论家中泛神论倾向的现象,以及界定犹太教与基督教立场的做法。马利克的神学方法试图将中世纪传统作为当代穆斯林进化论者的潜在资源,对此,为犹太进化论者生成一份可比较的前现代神学资源清单被证明是一个有趣的反事实的练习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Theology and Science
Theology and Science Arts and Humanities-History and Philosophy of Science
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
16.70%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: Membership of The Center for Theology and the Natural Sciences (CTNS) includes a subscription to Theology and Science . To become a member, please click here to view the current options. The primary editorial goal of Theology and Science is to publish critically reviewed articles that promote the creative mutual interaction between the natural sciences and theology. While the journal assumes the integrity of each domain, its primary aim is to explore this interaction in terms of the implications of the natural sciences for constructive research in philosophical and systematic theology, the philosophical and theological elements within and underlying theoretical research in the natural sciences, and the relations and interactions between theological and scientific methodologies. The secondary editorial goal is to monitor and critically assess debates and controversies arising in the broader field of science and religion. Thus, Theology and Science will investigate, analyze, and report on issues as they arise with the intention of prompting further academic discussion of them.This editorial policy is formulated with the guiding confidence that a serious dialogue between science and theology will lead to a variety of new and progressive research programs, and that these in turn will yield new insights, deeper understanding, and new knowledge at the frontiers of science and religion.
期刊最新文献
Introduction: The Future of Religion as Humans Expand into Space Compassionate AI and the Alignment Problem What Can We Reasonably Predict Concerning Alien Religion and Ethics? Do You Trust Science? Extra-Terrestrials or Terrestrial Heretics? Being Green in the Middle Ages
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1