A Wind Tunnel Study of the Shelter Effect of Different Vegetation Patterns of Caragana korshinskii

Q3 Environmental Science Journal of Resources and Ecology Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.06.014
Danish Bhutto, Li Wanying, Xiao Huijie
{"title":"A Wind Tunnel Study of the Shelter Effect of Different Vegetation Patterns of Caragana korshinskii","authors":"Danish Bhutto, Li Wanying, Xiao Huijie","doi":"10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.06.014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Windbreaks are important measures for reducing wind erosion in arid and semi-arid areas. A series of experiments were conducted in a wind tunnel to assess the effectiveness of different vegetation patterns (uniform, random, and cluster) of simulated Caragana korshinskii stands on wind speed. The uniform pattern provided a better shelter effect and was optimal at a density of 50%. The protected area and the wind reduction ratio increased and the downwind minimum wind speed decreased with an increase in the number of rows and a reduction in the belt's spacing. The locations of minimum wind speed (Xmin) were similar in arrangements with single-, two- and three-row belts. At the leeward distance close to vegetation (≤5 H, where H is the height of the plants), the efficiencies of vegetation patterns with high densities were greater than those of multiple-row belts and similar to those of multiple-belt shelterbelts; but at the leeward distance >5 H, the relationship was reversed. The single-row belt was the least effective, and the double-belt shelterbelt with belt spacing of 4 H was the most effective pattern. Multiple-belt shelterbelts had a lower downwind wind speed and a longer sheltering length than the other patterns, and so it is recommended windbreaks designed to reduce wind speed and control aeolian erosion in arid and semi-arid areas.","PeriodicalId":53414,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Resources and Ecology","volume":"27 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Resources and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5814/j.issn.1674-764x.2023.06.014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Windbreaks are important measures for reducing wind erosion in arid and semi-arid areas. A series of experiments were conducted in a wind tunnel to assess the effectiveness of different vegetation patterns (uniform, random, and cluster) of simulated Caragana korshinskii stands on wind speed. The uniform pattern provided a better shelter effect and was optimal at a density of 50%. The protected area and the wind reduction ratio increased and the downwind minimum wind speed decreased with an increase in the number of rows and a reduction in the belt's spacing. The locations of minimum wind speed (Xmin) were similar in arrangements with single-, two- and three-row belts. At the leeward distance close to vegetation (≤5 H, where H is the height of the plants), the efficiencies of vegetation patterns with high densities were greater than those of multiple-row belts and similar to those of multiple-belt shelterbelts; but at the leeward distance >5 H, the relationship was reversed. The single-row belt was the least effective, and the double-belt shelterbelt with belt spacing of 4 H was the most effective pattern. Multiple-belt shelterbelts had a lower downwind wind speed and a longer sheltering length than the other patterns, and so it is recommended windbreaks designed to reduce wind speed and control aeolian erosion in arid and semi-arid areas.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
柠条不同植被模式遮挡效应的风洞研究
防风林是干旱半干旱区减少风蚀的重要措施。通过风洞试验,研究了柠条人工林不同植被模式(均匀、随机、聚类)对风速的影响。均匀的格局提供了更好的遮蔽效果,并且在密度为50%时是最佳的。随着排数的增加和带间距的减小,保护地面积和风消减比增大,下风最小风速减小。最小风速(Xmin)的位置在单排带、二排带和三排带布置上是相似的。在接近植被的背风距离(≤5 H,其中H为植物高度),高密度植被格局的效率大于多排带,与多排防护林相似;但在背风距离>5 H时,关系相反。单排防护林效果最差,防护林间距为4 H的双带防护林效果最好。多带式防护林的下风向风速较低,防护林长度较长,因此建议在干旱半干旱区设计防风林,以降低风速和控制风蚀。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Resources and Ecology
Journal of Resources and Ecology Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊最新文献
Exploring Spatial Distribution and Influencing Factors of B&Bs in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei in the Regional Integration Context Based on Big Data Vulnerability and Influencing Factors for Rural Settlements Land Use in Karst Mountains of China: Case Study on Qixingguan District Evolution Pattern of Rural Tourism Investment Location Choice from the Perspective of Human-Land Relationship System: Based on a Case Study of Zhejiang Province, China Effect of Traditional Village Landscape Genes on Tourists' Image Construction: Case Study of Zhangguying Village Exploring the Norm-Activation Model-Based Mechanisms Influencing the Willingness of Environmentally Friendly Behavior of Backpackers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1