Dynamics of cultural policy valuations in contemporary Europe

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES Cultural Trends Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/09548963.2023.2255835
Claire Dedieu, Félix Dupin-Meynard, Eszter Gyorgy, Emmanuel Négrier, Gábor Oláh, Gábor Sonkoly
{"title":"Dynamics of cultural policy valuations in contemporary Europe","authors":"Claire Dedieu, Félix Dupin-Meynard, Eszter Gyorgy, Emmanuel Négrier, Gábor Oláh, Gábor Sonkoly","doi":"10.1080/09548963.2023.2255835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis paper questions the configurations in which contemporary European cultural policies attribute explicit positive values to culture. It begins with a reflection on the meaning of value, before identifying, through the analysis of a corpus of scientific articles, books and research reports as well as press articles, the numerous values identifiable in the history of cultural policies. From this collection, we propose a principle of classification into five major families of values: democracy, identity, well-being, aesthetics and economy. Finally, we describe the dynamics of emergence and transformation of the values attributed to culture in historical configurations, through three examples: the valuation of heritage, the conflicts over the values of democracy, and the values underpinning the concept of sustainable development. Our exploratory research shows that values already present in the twentieth century are becoming increasingly important in cultural policies, without taking precedence over values with which they can compete or, on the contrary, find a form of compatibility.KEYWORDS: ValuesEuropecultural policiesdemocracycultural heritagesustainable development Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This research focuses on the “explicit” values, as “promoted”, “attributed” to culture by cultural policies, in contexts of “democratic” regimes studied by the literature we have considered, thus necessarily “positive” in their formulations; we do not take this “positivity” for granted, but discuss it, on the one hand in itself, and on the other hand in interaction between a plurality of values (tensions).2 “Democracy” was chosen, rather than “politics”, as politics is an extremely broad “domain”, whereas “democracy” can be considered as a value containing particular normative orientations.3 “Economy” is understood here as the sphere of values related to power, competition and profit.","PeriodicalId":51682,"journal":{"name":"Cultural Trends","volume":"364 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cultural Trends","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09548963.2023.2255835","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis paper questions the configurations in which contemporary European cultural policies attribute explicit positive values to culture. It begins with a reflection on the meaning of value, before identifying, through the analysis of a corpus of scientific articles, books and research reports as well as press articles, the numerous values identifiable in the history of cultural policies. From this collection, we propose a principle of classification into five major families of values: democracy, identity, well-being, aesthetics and economy. Finally, we describe the dynamics of emergence and transformation of the values attributed to culture in historical configurations, through three examples: the valuation of heritage, the conflicts over the values of democracy, and the values underpinning the concept of sustainable development. Our exploratory research shows that values already present in the twentieth century are becoming increasingly important in cultural policies, without taking precedence over values with which they can compete or, on the contrary, find a form of compatibility.KEYWORDS: ValuesEuropecultural policiesdemocracycultural heritagesustainable development Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 This research focuses on the “explicit” values, as “promoted”, “attributed” to culture by cultural policies, in contexts of “democratic” regimes studied by the literature we have considered, thus necessarily “positive” in their formulations; we do not take this “positivity” for granted, but discuss it, on the one hand in itself, and on the other hand in interaction between a plurality of values (tensions).2 “Democracy” was chosen, rather than “politics”, as politics is an extremely broad “domain”, whereas “democracy” can be considered as a value containing particular normative orientations.3 “Economy” is understood here as the sphere of values related to power, competition and profit.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当代欧洲文化政策价值的动态
摘要本文质疑当代欧洲文化政策将明确的积极价值赋予文化的配置。它首先反思价值的意义,然后通过对科学文章、书籍和研究报告以及新闻文章的分析,确定文化政策历史上可识别的众多价值。从这个集合中,我们提出了一个原则,分为五个主要的价值观家族:民主,身份,福祉,美学和经济。最后,我们通过三个例子描述了在历史配置中归因于文化的价值观的出现和转变的动态:遗产的价值评估,民主价值观的冲突,以及支撑可持续发展概念的价值观。我们的探索性研究表明,20世纪已经存在的价值观在文化政策中变得越来越重要,而不是优先于它们可以竞争的价值观,或者相反,找到一种兼容的形式。关键词:价值观、欧洲文化政策、民主、文化遗产、可持续发展披露声明作者未报告潜在利益冲突。注1:本研究关注的是“显性”价值观,在我们所考虑的文献研究的“民主”政权背景下,文化政策“促进”、“归因于”文化,因此在其表述中必然是“积极的”;我们并不认为这种“积极性”是理所当然的,而是一方面讨论它本身,另一方面在多种价值(张力)之间的相互作用中讨论它之所以选择“民主”而不是“政治”,是因为政治是一个极其广泛的“领域”,而“民主”则可以被认为是一种包含特定规范取向的价值“经济”在这里被理解为与权力、竞争和利润相关的价值领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cultural Trends
Cultural Trends Multiple-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
16.10%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Mind the gap: causes and consequences of the racial gap in music funding organizations The role of cultural organisations in matters of equity, diversity, and inclusion Creating growth: labour’s plan for the arts, culture and creative industries Fashion as Creative Economy Cultural Leadership in Practice: Beyond Arts Management and Cultural Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1