Designing Formative Assessment That Improves Teaching and Learning: What Can Be Learned from the Design Stories of Experienced Teachers?

IF 1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of formative design in learning Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w
Janneke van der Steen, Tamara van Schilt-Mol, Cees van der Vleuten, Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke
{"title":"Designing Formative Assessment That Improves Teaching and Learning: What Can Be Learned from the Design Stories of Experienced Teachers?","authors":"Janneke van der Steen, Tamara van Schilt-Mol, Cees van der Vleuten, Desirée Joosten-ten Brinke","doi":"10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article reports on findings of a qualitative study that investigated the difficulties teachers encounter while designing formative assessment plans and the strategies experienced teachers use to avoid those pitfalls. The pitfalls were identified through an analysis of formative assessment plans that searched for potential threats to alignment, decision-driven data collection, and room for adjustment and improvement. The main pitfalls in the design process occurred when teachers did not explicitly and coherently link all elements of their formative assessment plan or when they did not plan to effectively use information about student learning to improve teaching and learning. Through interviews with experienced teachers, we identified seven design strategies they used to design formative assessment plans that were aligned, consisted of decision-driven data collection, and left room for adjustment and improvement. However, these experienced teachers still encountered difficulties in determining how to formulate the right decisions for decision-driven data collection and how to provide students with enough room for improvement. Lessons learned from the design strategies of these experienced teachers are incorporated in design steps for formative assessment plans all teachers can use.","PeriodicalId":73753,"journal":{"name":"Journal of formative design in learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of formative design in learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-023-00080-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article reports on findings of a qualitative study that investigated the difficulties teachers encounter while designing formative assessment plans and the strategies experienced teachers use to avoid those pitfalls. The pitfalls were identified through an analysis of formative assessment plans that searched for potential threats to alignment, decision-driven data collection, and room for adjustment and improvement. The main pitfalls in the design process occurred when teachers did not explicitly and coherently link all elements of their formative assessment plan or when they did not plan to effectively use information about student learning to improve teaching and learning. Through interviews with experienced teachers, we identified seven design strategies they used to design formative assessment plans that were aligned, consisted of decision-driven data collection, and left room for adjustment and improvement. However, these experienced teachers still encountered difficulties in determining how to formulate the right decisions for decision-driven data collection and how to provide students with enough room for improvement. Lessons learned from the design strategies of these experienced teachers are incorporated in design steps for formative assessment plans all teachers can use.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计形成性评估以改善教与学:从经验丰富的教师的设计故事中学到什么?
本文报告了一项定性研究的结果,该研究调查了教师在设计形成性评估计划时遇到的困难,以及经验丰富的教师用来避免这些陷阱的策略。陷阱是通过对形成性评估计划的分析来确定的,该评估计划寻找对校准、决策驱动的数据收集以及调整和改进的空间的潜在威胁。当教师没有明确和连贯地将其形成性评估计划的所有要素联系起来,或者当他们没有计划有效地利用有关学生学习的信息来改进教与学时,设计过程中的主要陷阱就会出现。通过采访经验丰富的教师,我们确定了他们用来设计形成性评估计划的七种设计策略,这些策略是一致的,包括决策驱动的数据收集,并留下调整和改进的空间。然而,这些经验丰富的教师在如何制定正确的决策来进行决策驱动的数据收集以及如何为学生提供足够的改进空间方面仍然遇到困难。从这些经验丰富的教师的设计策略中吸取的经验教训被纳入所有教师都可以使用的形成性评估计划的设计步骤中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Use of QR Codes to Enhance Learning in a Graduate-Level Clinical Course Secondary School Teachers’ Use of Formative Assessment Practice to Create Co-regulated Learning Design, Development, and Formative Evaluation of a Hybrid Remote Quantum Laboratory Supporting HBCU Partnerships Correction: Faculty in Action: Researching a Community of Practice Approach to Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment How Do We Flip Our Language Classroom? Reassessing the Flipped Method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1