‘A Supremely Good Chinovik’: William Strang, Europe, and the Role of the Official, 1919–1949

IF 0.3 3区 社会学 Q2 HISTORY Diplomacy & Statecraft Pub Date : 2023-10-02 DOI:10.1080/09592296.2023.2270327
Oliver Yule-Smith
{"title":"‘A Supremely Good Chinovik’: William Strang, Europe, and the Role of the Official, 1919–1949","authors":"Oliver Yule-Smith","doi":"10.1080/09592296.2023.2270327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sir William Strang was the Permanent Under-Secretary of the Foreign Office from 1949 to 1953, he was the most senior Foreign Office official at an important period in British foreign policy. Prior to this appointment, he enjoyed a Foreign Office career that spanned some three decades, where he was involved in notable episodes such as the Munich Agreement, the Moscow Conference (1939), the workings of the European Advisory Commission, and the post-war occupation of Germany. Strang’s career, however, has been subject to little scholarly attention. He is often regarded as a competent, yet singularly dull individual lacking the intellect or the original thinking of his contemporaries, such as Robert Vansittart, Alexander Cadogan, Orme Sargent, or Gladwyn Jebb. This article challenges this interpretation, arguing that while Strang has a clearly identifiable worldview, this was intrinsically tied to his view of the proper function of a Foreign Office official. For Strang, it was not the role of the official to sway a minister’s mind with well-argued memoranda, but to make vast quantities of information and arguments comprehensible to allow a minister to make as informed a decision as possible. This fundamental tenet of Strang’s worldview must be understood when examining his career prior to his appointment as Permanent Under-Secretary of the Foreign Office.","PeriodicalId":44804,"journal":{"name":"Diplomacy & Statecraft","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diplomacy & Statecraft","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09592296.2023.2270327","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sir William Strang was the Permanent Under-Secretary of the Foreign Office from 1949 to 1953, he was the most senior Foreign Office official at an important period in British foreign policy. Prior to this appointment, he enjoyed a Foreign Office career that spanned some three decades, where he was involved in notable episodes such as the Munich Agreement, the Moscow Conference (1939), the workings of the European Advisory Commission, and the post-war occupation of Germany. Strang’s career, however, has been subject to little scholarly attention. He is often regarded as a competent, yet singularly dull individual lacking the intellect or the original thinking of his contemporaries, such as Robert Vansittart, Alexander Cadogan, Orme Sargent, or Gladwyn Jebb. This article challenges this interpretation, arguing that while Strang has a clearly identifiable worldview, this was intrinsically tied to his view of the proper function of a Foreign Office official. For Strang, it was not the role of the official to sway a minister’s mind with well-argued memoranda, but to make vast quantities of information and arguments comprehensible to allow a minister to make as informed a decision as possible. This fundamental tenet of Strang’s worldview must be understood when examining his career prior to his appointment as Permanent Under-Secretary of the Foreign Office.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“一个极好的奇诺维克”:威廉·斯特朗,《欧洲与官员的角色》,1919-1949
威廉·斯特朗爵士于1949年至1953年担任外交部常务副部长,是英国外交政策重要时期外交部级别最高的官员。在此之前,他在外交部工作了大约30年,参与了慕尼黑协定、莫斯科会议(1939年)、欧洲咨询委员会的运作以及战后对德国的占领等著名事件。然而,斯特朗的职业生涯却很少受到学术界的关注。他经常被认为是一个有能力的人,但却非常迟钝,缺乏他同时代人的智力或原创思维,比如罗伯特·范西塔特、亚历山大·卡多根、奥姆·萨金特或格拉德温·杰布。这篇文章对这种解释提出了挑战,认为尽管斯特朗有一个明确的世界观,但这与他对外交部官员应有职能的看法有着内在的联系。对斯特朗来说,官员的角色不是用论证充分的备忘录来左右部长的思想,而是让大量的信息和论点变得容易理解,以便部长做出尽可能明智的决定。在考察斯特朗被任命为外交部常务副部长之前的职业生涯时,必须理解他世界观的这一基本原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊最新文献
“I Have Concluded That the US Government Will Adopt a New Focus in Its Policies Towards the Government of South Africa.” President Jimmy Carter and Apartheid South Africa The ‘US Factor’ in the Satō Administration’s Diplomacy in the Indonesia-Malaysia Conflict, 1964-1966 The 1941 Merano Conference: Building a Relationship Through Military Diplomacy An Indefinite Alliance? Article 13 and the North Atlantic Treaty David Owen, Human Rights, and the Remaking of British Foreign Policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1