Sepsis in Polytrauma Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Damage Control versus Early Total Care regarding the Injury Severity Score using IBM Watson Pathway Explorer®

Jan Hambrecht, Philipp Vetter, Cedric Niggli, Hans-Christoph Pape, Ladislav Mica
{"title":"Sepsis in Polytrauma Patients: A Comparative Analysis of Damage Control versus Early Total Care regarding the Injury Severity Score using IBM Watson Pathway Explorer®","authors":"Jan Hambrecht, Philipp Vetter, Cedric Niggli, Hans-Christoph Pape, Ladislav Mica","doi":"10.26502/jsr.10020318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sepsis presents a challenge in polytrauma patients care, where timing of procedures is crucial. The University Hospital of Zurich and IBM developed IBM Watson Trauma Pathway Explorer for predicting polytrauma complications such as SIRS, Sepsis, and early death within 72 hours. We intended to investigate the association of surgical treatment (Damage Control, DCS and Early Total Care, ETC) and injury severity (Injury Severity Score, ISS) with the development of sepsis. Data from 3653 patients was included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of surgical management (DCS, ETC) and injury severity (ISS ≤ 30, ISS > 30). The groups were assessed for the development of sepsis. Totally, 1242 patients had an ISS > 30 (34.6%), while 2374 had an ISS ≤ 30 (65.4%). DCS was conducted in 66.3% of cases versus 33.7% for ETC. DCS was performed in 73.5% of patients with an ISS > 30 and in 62.5% of patients with an ISS ≤ 30. ETC was performed in 26.5% for ISS > 30 and 37.5% for ISS ≤ 30. Sepsis was detected in 15% of the patients. 50.8% of sepsis cases had an initial ISS > 30. Regarding ETC, sepsis occurred in 9.6% of cases with ISS ≤ 30 and in 18.5% of cases with an ISS > 30. Regarding DCS, sepsis was detected in 12.3% with ISS ≤ 30 and in 23.4% with ISS > 30. Development of sepsis was associated with ISS > 30 (OR 2.21, p < 0.001) and DCS treatment (OR 1.45, p< 0.001). The findings confirm the association of sepsis development in polytrauma patients with a higher injury severity (ISS < 30). On the other hand, DCS does not generally imply a lower risk for this complication.","PeriodicalId":73961,"journal":{"name":"Journal of surgery and research","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of surgery and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/jsr.10020318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sepsis presents a challenge in polytrauma patients care, where timing of procedures is crucial. The University Hospital of Zurich and IBM developed IBM Watson Trauma Pathway Explorer for predicting polytrauma complications such as SIRS, Sepsis, and early death within 72 hours. We intended to investigate the association of surgical treatment (Damage Control, DCS and Early Total Care, ETC) and injury severity (Injury Severity Score, ISS) with the development of sepsis. Data from 3653 patients was included. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of surgical management (DCS, ETC) and injury severity (ISS ≤ 30, ISS > 30). The groups were assessed for the development of sepsis. Totally, 1242 patients had an ISS > 30 (34.6%), while 2374 had an ISS ≤ 30 (65.4%). DCS was conducted in 66.3% of cases versus 33.7% for ETC. DCS was performed in 73.5% of patients with an ISS > 30 and in 62.5% of patients with an ISS ≤ 30. ETC was performed in 26.5% for ISS > 30 and 37.5% for ISS ≤ 30. Sepsis was detected in 15% of the patients. 50.8% of sepsis cases had an initial ISS > 30. Regarding ETC, sepsis occurred in 9.6% of cases with ISS ≤ 30 and in 18.5% of cases with an ISS > 30. Regarding DCS, sepsis was detected in 12.3% with ISS ≤ 30 and in 23.4% with ISS > 30. Development of sepsis was associated with ISS > 30 (OR 2.21, p < 0.001) and DCS treatment (OR 1.45, p< 0.001). The findings confirm the association of sepsis development in polytrauma patients with a higher injury severity (ISS < 30). On the other hand, DCS does not generally imply a lower risk for this complication.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多创伤患者的脓毒症:使用IBM Watson Pathway Explorer®对损伤严重程度评分进行损伤控制与早期全面护理的比较分析
脓毒症提出了一个挑战,在多创伤患者护理,时机的程序是至关重要的。苏黎世大学医院和IBM开发了IBM沃森创伤路径探索者,用于预测多重创伤并发症,如SIRS、败血症和72小时内的早期死亡。我们打算调查手术治疗(损伤控制,DCS和早期全面护理,ETC)和损伤严重程度(损伤严重程度评分,ISS)与脓毒症发展的关系。数据来自3653名患者。根据手术方式(DCS、ETC)和损伤严重程度(ISS≤30、ISS > 30)将患者分为两组。评估各组败血症的发展情况。ISS > 30的1242例(34.6%),ISS≤30的2374例(65.4%)。66.3%的病例行DCS,而ETC为33.7%。73.5%的ISS > 30的患者和62.5%的ISS≤30的患者行DCS。ISS > 30和≤30的患者分别占26.5%和37.5%。15%的患者被检测出脓毒症。50.8%的脓毒症患者初始ISS > 30。对于ETC, ISS≤30的患者发生脓毒症的比例为9.6%,ISS > 30的患者发生脓毒症的比例为18.5%。ISS≤30时,12.3%的患者出现脓毒症,ISS > 30时,23.4%的患者出现脓毒症。脓毒症的发生与ISS > 30 (OR 2.21, p< 0.001)和DCS治疗相关(OR 1.45, p< 0.001)。研究结果证实,脓毒症的发展与多发创伤患者较高的损伤严重程度(ISS < 30)有关。另一方面,DCS通常并不意味着该并发症的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Modulation of Inflammatory Response by Electromagnetic Field Stimulation in Traumatic Brain Injury in Yucatan Swine. Understanding Fibrous Tissue in the Effective Healing of Rotator Cuff Injury. Critical Assessment of the Neurological Complications during High-Risk Anesthesia Procedures. Non-Tobacco Nicotine dependence associated with increased Postoperative Complications following Intramedullary Nailing for Intertrochanteric Femur Fractures. Health-Outcomes and Epidemiologic Research of Transgender Patients Requires Simple, Meaningful Diagnostic Codes: A Retrospective Review of California Emergency Department Visits.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1