Bengi BALCI, Mehmet ÜSTÜN, Mustafa BOZDAĞ, Ali ER, Dudu SOLAKOĞLU KAHRAMAN, Cengiz AYDIN
{"title":"Klinik Pratikte ACR-TIRADS’ın Uygulanması","authors":"Bengi BALCI, Mehmet ÜSTÜN, Mustafa BOZDAĞ, Ali ER, Dudu SOLAKOĞLU KAHRAMAN, Cengiz AYDIN","doi":"10.17343/sdutfd.1306615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective
 To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thyroid
 Imaging, Reporting and Data System of the American
 College of Radiology in thyroid nodules.
 Material and Method
 A total of 151 nodules were collected from 62 patients
 undergoing thyroid surgery in our center between
 August 2017 and September 2018. Ultrasonographic
 features of each nodule were recorded and classified
 according to the Thyroid, Imaging Reporting and Data
 System of the American College of Radiology by two
 radiologists and compared with a one-to-one basis on
 histopathology.
 Results
 The median size of 151 thyroid nodules measured on
 the ultrasound and in the pathology specimens were
 19 (3-85) mm and 17 (0-97) mm, respectively. Papillary
 carcinoma was demonstrated in 28 patients (45%),
 papillary microcarcinoma in 14 patients (22.5%), and
 Hurthle cell carcinoma in 1 (1.6%) patient. Overall
 sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,
 and negative predictive value for this nodule risk
 stratification model were analyzed as 82.5%, 57%,
 64.58%, and 77.67%, respectively.
 Conclusion
 Setting a definitive size threshold for fine needle
 aspiration might be misleading, instead signifying the
 malignant features on ultrasonography, and making a
 decision for surgery on an individual base should be
 recommended.","PeriodicalId":32000,"journal":{"name":"Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.1306615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thyroid
Imaging, Reporting and Data System of the American
College of Radiology in thyroid nodules.
Material and Method
A total of 151 nodules were collected from 62 patients
undergoing thyroid surgery in our center between
August 2017 and September 2018. Ultrasonographic
features of each nodule were recorded and classified
according to the Thyroid, Imaging Reporting and Data
System of the American College of Radiology by two
radiologists and compared with a one-to-one basis on
histopathology.
Results
The median size of 151 thyroid nodules measured on
the ultrasound and in the pathology specimens were
19 (3-85) mm and 17 (0-97) mm, respectively. Papillary
carcinoma was demonstrated in 28 patients (45%),
papillary microcarcinoma in 14 patients (22.5%), and
Hurthle cell carcinoma in 1 (1.6%) patient. Overall
sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,
and negative predictive value for this nodule risk
stratification model were analyzed as 82.5%, 57%,
64.58%, and 77.67%, respectively.
Conclusion
Setting a definitive size threshold for fine needle
aspiration might be misleading, instead signifying the
malignant features on ultrasonography, and making a
decision for surgery on an individual base should be
recommended.