Klinik Pratikte ACR-TIRADS’ın Uygulanması

Bengi BALCI, Mehmet ÜSTÜN, Mustafa BOZDAĞ, Ali ER, Dudu SOLAKOĞLU KAHRAMAN, Cengiz AYDIN
{"title":"Klinik Pratikte ACR-TIRADS’ın Uygulanması","authors":"Bengi BALCI, Mehmet ÜSTÜN, Mustafa BOZDAĞ, Ali ER, Dudu SOLAKOĞLU KAHRAMAN, Cengiz AYDIN","doi":"10.17343/sdutfd.1306615","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective
 To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thyroid
 Imaging, Reporting and Data System of the American
 College of Radiology in thyroid nodules.
 Material and Method
 A total of 151 nodules were collected from 62 patients
 undergoing thyroid surgery in our center between
 August 2017 and September 2018. Ultrasonographic
 features of each nodule were recorded and classified
 according to the Thyroid, Imaging Reporting and Data
 System of the American College of Radiology by two
 radiologists and compared with a one-to-one basis on
 histopathology.
 Results
 The median size of 151 thyroid nodules measured on
 the ultrasound and in the pathology specimens were
 19 (3-85) mm and 17 (0-97) mm, respectively. Papillary
 carcinoma was demonstrated in 28 patients (45%),
 papillary microcarcinoma in 14 patients (22.5%), and
 Hurthle cell carcinoma in 1 (1.6%) patient. Overall
 sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,
 and negative predictive value for this nodule risk
 stratification model were analyzed as 82.5%, 57%,
 64.58%, and 77.67%, respectively.
 Conclusion
 Setting a definitive size threshold for fine needle
 aspiration might be misleading, instead signifying the
 malignant features on ultrasonography, and making a
 decision for surgery on an individual base should be
 recommended.","PeriodicalId":32000,"journal":{"name":"Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Suleyman Demirel Universitesi Tip Fakultesi Dergisi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17343/sdutfd.1306615","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of the Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System of the American College of Radiology in thyroid nodules. Material and Method A total of 151 nodules were collected from 62 patients undergoing thyroid surgery in our center between August 2017 and September 2018. Ultrasonographic features of each nodule were recorded and classified according to the Thyroid, Imaging Reporting and Data System of the American College of Radiology by two radiologists and compared with a one-to-one basis on histopathology. Results The median size of 151 thyroid nodules measured on the ultrasound and in the pathology specimens were 19 (3-85) mm and 17 (0-97) mm, respectively. Papillary carcinoma was demonstrated in 28 patients (45%), papillary microcarcinoma in 14 patients (22.5%), and Hurthle cell carcinoma in 1 (1.6%) patient. Overall sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for this nodule risk stratification model were analyzed as 82.5%, 57%, 64.58%, and 77.67%, respectively. Conclusion Setting a definitive size threshold for fine needle aspiration might be misleading, instead signifying the malignant features on ultrasonography, and making a decision for surgery on an individual base should be recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ACR-TIRADS 在临床实践中的应用
目标# x0D;探讨甲状腺甲状腺疾病的诊断准确性;美国影像、报告和数据系统 甲状腺结节放射学院; 材料与方法 62例患者共收集151个结节 在我中心接受甲状腺手术 2017年8月和2018年9月。超声# x0D;记录每个结节的特征并进行分类 根据甲状腺影像学报告和数据 美国放射学会系统由2 放射科医生和一对一的基础上进行比较 组织病理学强生# x0D;结果# x0D;在 上测量的151个甲状腺结节中位大小;病理标本超声和病理切片均为 分别为19 (3 ~ 85)mm和17 (0 ~ 97)mm。乳头状# x0D;28例(45%)患者表现为癌, 乳头状微癌14例(22.5%), Hurthle细胞癌1例(1.6%)。整体# x0D;敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值, 该结节风险预测值为阴性 分层模型分析为82.5%,57%, 分别为64.58%和77.67%。 结论# x0D;细针确定尺寸阈值 抱负可能会误导人,相反,它意味着超声检查的恶性特征,并作出a 在个人基础上决定手术应该是 推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
MEŞRU SAVUNMADA ORANTILILIK Yapay Zeka ve Uluslararası Hukukun Geleceği Türk Ceza Hukukunda Müsamaha Edilen Zimmet Kavramı ve Müsamaha Edilen Zimmetin Cezalandırılmamasının Nedeni Over Seröz Karsinomunda ve Borderline Seröz Tümörde İmmünhıstokimyasal PINCH/LIMS-1 Antikor Ekspresyonunun Klinikopatolojik Değeri Hymenoptera Venom-Induced Anaphylaxis: Our Clinical Experience
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1