Understanding the what, how, and why in advocacy: Assessing the applicability of participatory process evaluation methodology in an advocacy context

IF 2.4 3区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Evaluation Pub Date : 2023-09-23 DOI:10.1177/13563890231200057
Bente van Oort, Hilda van ‘t Riet, Adriana Parejo Pagador, Rosana Lescrauwaet Noboa, Carolien Aantjes
{"title":"Understanding the what, how, and why in advocacy: Assessing the applicability of participatory process evaluation methodology in an advocacy context","authors":"Bente van Oort, Hilda van ‘t Riet, Adriana Parejo Pagador, Rosana Lescrauwaet Noboa, Carolien Aantjes","doi":"10.1177/13563890231200057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While evaluations are critical for non-governmental organizations to strengthen their advocacy strategies, evaluators and advocates encounter many difficulties evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the contribution of the participatory process evaluation methodology to advocacy evaluation, using a Dutch global health advocacy program as a case study. As participatory process evaluation is a novel methodology in the field of advocacy, the article’s primary focus concerns the application and utility of the methodology. Findings suggest that participatory process evaluation in an advocacy context can provide insights into the implementation of advocacy tools and activities, encouraging reflection and leading to ideas and practical tools to strengthen advocacy efforts. While participatory process evaluation can help overcome some of the often-experienced barriers in advocacy evaluation, further research is needed to consolidate advocacy evaluation theory and practice.","PeriodicalId":47511,"journal":{"name":"Evaluation","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890231200057","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While evaluations are critical for non-governmental organizations to strengthen their advocacy strategies, evaluators and advocates encounter many difficulties evaluating such efforts. This article discusses the contribution of the participatory process evaluation methodology to advocacy evaluation, using a Dutch global health advocacy program as a case study. As participatory process evaluation is a novel methodology in the field of advocacy, the article’s primary focus concerns the application and utility of the methodology. Findings suggest that participatory process evaluation in an advocacy context can provide insights into the implementation of advocacy tools and activities, encouraging reflection and leading to ideas and practical tools to strengthen advocacy efforts. While participatory process evaluation can help overcome some of the often-experienced barriers in advocacy evaluation, further research is needed to consolidate advocacy evaluation theory and practice.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解倡导的内容、方式和原因:评估参与式过程评估方法在倡导背景下的适用性
虽然评价对非政府组织加强其宣传战略至关重要,但评价人员和宣传人员在评价这些努力时遇到许多困难。本文以荷兰全球健康倡导项目为例,讨论了参与式过程评估方法对倡导评估的贡献。由于参与式过程评估是倡导领域的一种新方法,本文主要关注的是该方法的应用和效用。调查结果表明,倡导背景下的参与性进程评价可以为倡导工具和活动的实施提供见解,鼓励反思并产生加强倡导工作的想法和实用工具。虽然参与式过程评价有助于克服倡导评价中经常遇到的一些障碍,但需要进一步研究以巩固倡导评价的理论和实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Evaluation
Evaluation SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
25.00%
发文量
35
期刊最新文献
Using co-creation to address monitoring and evaluation challenges: The experience of South Africa’s evaluation hackathon What role should we play to be effective evaluators? – practitioner reflections Principles and methods to advance value for money Evaluating site selection at design in food systems interventions: A formative geospatial approach What works in democracy support? How to fill evidence and usability gaps through evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1