External financing, channel power structure and product green R&D decisions in supply chains

Jianchang Fan, Zhun Li, Fei Ye, Yuhui Li, Nana Wan
{"title":"External financing, channel power structure and product green R&D decisions in supply chains","authors":"Jianchang Fan, Zhun Li, Fei Ye, Yuhui Li, Nana Wan","doi":"10.1108/mscra-04-2023-0013","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This study aims to focus on the optimal green R&D of a capital-constrained supply chain under different channel power structures as well as the impact of capital constraint, financing cost, channel power structure and cost-reducing efficiency on green R&D and supply chain profitability. Design/methodology/approach A two-echelon supply chain is considered. The upstream firm engages in green R&D but has capital constraints that can be overcome by external financing. Green R&D is beneficial to reduce production costs and increase consumer demand. Based on whether or not the upstream firm is capital constrained and dominates the supply chain, four models are developed. Findings Capital constraints significantly lower green R&D and supply chain profitability. Transferring leadership from the upstream to the downstream firms leads to higher green R&D levels and downstream firm profitability, whereas the upstream firm's profitability is increased (decreased) if green R&D investment efficiency is high (low) enough. Greater financing costs reduce green R&D and downstream firm profitability; however, the upstream firm's profitability under the model in which it functions as the follower increases if the initial capital is sufficient. More importantly, empirical analysis based on practice data is used to verify the theoretical results reported above. Practical implications This study reveals how upstream firms in supply chains decide green R&D decisions in situations with capital constraints, providing managers and governments with an understanding of the impact of capital constraint, channel power structure, financing cost and cost-reducing efficiency on supply chain green R&D and profitability. Originality/value The major contributions are the exploration of supply chain green R&D by taking into consideration channel power structures and cost-reducing efficiency and the validation of theoretical results using practice data.","PeriodicalId":18614,"journal":{"name":"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Modern Supply Chain Research and Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/mscra-04-2023-0013","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to focus on the optimal green R&D of a capital-constrained supply chain under different channel power structures as well as the impact of capital constraint, financing cost, channel power structure and cost-reducing efficiency on green R&D and supply chain profitability. Design/methodology/approach A two-echelon supply chain is considered. The upstream firm engages in green R&D but has capital constraints that can be overcome by external financing. Green R&D is beneficial to reduce production costs and increase consumer demand. Based on whether or not the upstream firm is capital constrained and dominates the supply chain, four models are developed. Findings Capital constraints significantly lower green R&D and supply chain profitability. Transferring leadership from the upstream to the downstream firms leads to higher green R&D levels and downstream firm profitability, whereas the upstream firm's profitability is increased (decreased) if green R&D investment efficiency is high (low) enough. Greater financing costs reduce green R&D and downstream firm profitability; however, the upstream firm's profitability under the model in which it functions as the follower increases if the initial capital is sufficient. More importantly, empirical analysis based on practice data is used to verify the theoretical results reported above. Practical implications This study reveals how upstream firms in supply chains decide green R&D decisions in situations with capital constraints, providing managers and governments with an understanding of the impact of capital constraint, channel power structure, financing cost and cost-reducing efficiency on supply chain green R&D and profitability. Originality/value The major contributions are the exploration of supply chain green R&D by taking into consideration channel power structures and cost-reducing efficiency and the validation of theoretical results using practice data.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
供应链外部融资、渠道权力结构与产品绿色研发决策
本研究旨在研究不同渠道权力结构下资金约束下供应链的最优绿色研发,以及资金约束、融资成本、渠道权力结构和降成本效率对绿色研发和供应链盈利能力的影响。设计/方法/途径考虑一个两级供应链。上游企业从事绿色研发,但有资金限制,可以通过外部融资来克服。绿色研发有利于降低生产成本,增加消费者需求。基于上游企业是否受资本约束并主导供应链,建立了四种模型。发现资本约束显著降低了绿色研发和供应链盈利能力。领导权从上游企业转移到下游企业,会提高绿色研发水平和下游企业的盈利能力,而如果绿色研发投资效率足够高(低),上游企业的盈利能力会增加(降低)。更高的融资成本降低了绿色研发和下游企业的盈利能力;然而,当初始资本充足时,上游企业作为跟随者模型下的盈利能力会增加。更重要的是,采用基于实践数据的实证分析来验证上述理论结果。本研究揭示了供应链上游企业在资本约束情况下如何做出绿色研发决策,为管理者和政府提供了资本约束、渠道权力结构、融资成本和降成本效率对供应链绿色研发和盈利能力的影响。主要贡献是通过考虑渠道权力结构和成本降低效率对供应链绿色研发的探索,以及用实践数据对理论结果的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Research on interregional oil cooperation-sanctions with evolutionary game Linking business analytics capability and sustainability performance: the mediating role of circular economy implementation Research on closed-loop supply chain decision-making of power battery echelon utilization under the scenario of trade-in On the benefit of developing customer profile analysis to implement personalized pricing in a supply chain Supply chain sustainability and risk management in food cold chains – a literature review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1