Producer and consumer perspectives on supporting and diversifying local food systems in central Iowa

IF 3.5 2区 社会学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Agriculture and Human Values Pub Date : 2023-09-23 DOI:10.1007/s10460-023-10504-9
Michael C. Dorneich, Caroline C. Krejci, Nicholas Schwab, Tiffanie F. Stone, Erin Huckins, Janette R. Thompson, Ulrike Passe
{"title":"Producer and consumer perspectives on supporting and diversifying local food systems in central Iowa","authors":"Michael C. Dorneich,&nbsp;Caroline C. Krejci,&nbsp;Nicholas Schwab,&nbsp;Tiffanie F. Stone,&nbsp;Erin Huckins,&nbsp;Janette R. Thompson,&nbsp;Ulrike Passe","doi":"10.1007/s10460-023-10504-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The majority of food in the US is distributed through global/national supply chains that exclude locally-produced goods. This situation offers opportunities to increase local food production and consumption and is influenced by constraints that limit the scale of these activities. We conducted a study to assess perspectives of producers and consumers engaged in food systems of a major Midwestern city. We examined producers’ willingness to include/increase cultivation of local foods and consumers’ interest in purchasing/increasing local foods. We used focus groups of producers (two groups of conventional farmers, four local food producers) and consumers (three conventional market participants, two locavores) to pose questions about production/consumption of local foods. We transcribed discussions verbatim and examined text to identify themes, using separate affinity diagrams for producers and consumers. We found producers and consumers are influenced by the <i>status quo</i> and real and perceived barriers to local foods. We also learned participants believed increasing production and consumption of local foods would benefit their community and creating better infrastructure could enhance efforts to scale up local food systems. Focus group participants also indicated support from external champions/programs could support expansion of local foods. We learned that diversifying local food production was viewed as a way to support local community, increase access to healthy foods and reduce environmental impacts of conventional production. Our research indicates that encouraging producers and consumers in local food systems will be more successful when support for the local community is emphasized.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7683,"journal":{"name":"Agriculture and Human Values","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10460-023-10504-9.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agriculture and Human Values","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10460-023-10504-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The majority of food in the US is distributed through global/national supply chains that exclude locally-produced goods. This situation offers opportunities to increase local food production and consumption and is influenced by constraints that limit the scale of these activities. We conducted a study to assess perspectives of producers and consumers engaged in food systems of a major Midwestern city. We examined producers’ willingness to include/increase cultivation of local foods and consumers’ interest in purchasing/increasing local foods. We used focus groups of producers (two groups of conventional farmers, four local food producers) and consumers (three conventional market participants, two locavores) to pose questions about production/consumption of local foods. We transcribed discussions verbatim and examined text to identify themes, using separate affinity diagrams for producers and consumers. We found producers and consumers are influenced by the status quo and real and perceived barriers to local foods. We also learned participants believed increasing production and consumption of local foods would benefit their community and creating better infrastructure could enhance efforts to scale up local food systems. Focus group participants also indicated support from external champions/programs could support expansion of local foods. We learned that diversifying local food production was viewed as a way to support local community, increase access to healthy foods and reduce environmental impacts of conventional production. Our research indicates that encouraging producers and consumers in local food systems will be more successful when support for the local community is emphasized.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
生产者和消费者对支持爱荷华州中部地方食品体系并使之多样化的看法
美国的大部分食品都是通过全球/国家供应链分销的,不包括本地生产的商品。这种情况为增加本地食品生产和消费提供了机会,但也受到限制这些活动规模的制约因素的影响。我们开展了一项研究,以评估中西部某大城市食品系统中生产者和消费者的观点。我们考察了生产者纳入/增加本地食品种植的意愿,以及消费者购买/增加本地食品的兴趣。我们利用生产者(两组传统农民、四组本地食品生产者)和消费者(三组传统市场参与者、两组本地消费者)的焦点小组,提出有关本地食品生产/消费的问题。我们对讨论内容进行了逐字记录,并使用生产者和消费者各自的亲和图对文本进行了研究,以确定主题。我们发现,生产者和消费者都受到现状以及当地食品的实际和感知障碍的影响。我们还了解到,参与者认为增加本地食品的生产和消费将造福于他们的社区,而创建更好的基础设施则可以加强扩大本地食品系统的努力。焦点小组参与者还表示,外部支持者/计划的支持可以支持地方食品的扩展。我们了解到,当地食品生产多样化被视为支持当地社区、增加获得健康食品的机会以及减少传统生产对环境影响的一种方式。我们的研究表明,如果强调对当地社区的支持,鼓励生产者和消费者参与当地食品体系的工作将更加成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agriculture and Human Values
Agriculture and Human Values 农林科学-科学史与科学哲学
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
97
审稿时长
>36 weeks
期刊介绍: Agriculture and Human Values is the journal of the Agriculture, Food, and Human Values Society. The Journal, like the Society, is dedicated to an open and free discussion of the values that shape and the structures that underlie current and alternative visions of food and agricultural systems. To this end the Journal publishes interdisciplinary research that critically examines the values, relationships, conflicts and contradictions within contemporary agricultural and food systems and that addresses the impact of agricultural and food related institutions, policies, and practices on human populations, the environment, democratic governance, and social equity.
期刊最新文献
Books received A buzzword, a “win-win”, or a signal towards the future of agriculture? A critical analysis of regenerative agriculture Valuing farmers in transitions to more sustainable food systems: A systematic literature review of local food producers’ experiences and contributions in short food supply chains Make the desert bloom—imaginaries, infrastructure, and water-land entanglement in desert agriculture in Israel Correction: Between “better than” and “as good as”: mobilizing social representations of alternative proteins to transform meat and dairy consumption practices
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1