Antibiotic treatment durations for pyogenic liver abscesses: A systematic review

Q3 Medicine JAMMI Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.3138/jammi-2023-0004
Jennifer Curran, Catherine Mulhall, Ruxandra Pinto, Mohamed Bucheeri, Nick Daneman
{"title":"Antibiotic treatment durations for pyogenic liver abscesses: A systematic review","authors":"Jennifer Curran, Catherine Mulhall, Ruxandra Pinto, Mohamed Bucheeri, Nick Daneman","doi":"10.3138/jammi-2023-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: We sought to systematically review the existing research on pyogenic liver abscesses to determine what data exist on antibiotic treatment durations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary medical literature from 2000 to 2020, searching for studies of pyogenic liver abscesses. The primary outcome of interest was mean antibiotic treatment duration, which we pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was performed to examine characteristics influencing antibiotic durations. Results: Sixteen studies (of 3,933 patients) provided sufficient data on antibiotic durations for pooling in meta-analysis. Mean antibiotic durations were highly variable across studies, from 8.4±5.3 to 68.9±30.3 days. The pooled mean treatment duration was 32.7 days (95% CI 24.9 to 40.6 days), but heterogeneity was very high ( I 2 = 100%). In meta-regression, there was a non-significant trend towards decreased mean antibiotic treatment durations over later study years (−1.14 days/study year, 95% CI −2.74, +0.45, p = 0.16). Mean treatment duration was not associated with mean age of participants, percentage of infections caused by Klebsiella spp., percentage of patients with abscesses over 5 cm in diameter, percentage of patients with multiple abscesses, and percentage of patients receiving medical management. No randomized trials have compared treatment durations for pyogenic liver abscess, and no observational studies have reported outcomes according to treatment duration. Conclusions: Among studies reporting on antibiotic durations for pyogenic liver abscess, treatment practices are highly variable. This variability does not seem to be explained by differences in patient, pathogen, abscess, or management characteristics. Future RCTs are needed to guide optimal treatment duration for patients with this complex infection.","PeriodicalId":36782,"journal":{"name":"JAMMI","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMMI","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3138/jammi-2023-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We sought to systematically review the existing research on pyogenic liver abscesses to determine what data exist on antibiotic treatment durations. Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of contemporary medical literature from 2000 to 2020, searching for studies of pyogenic liver abscesses. The primary outcome of interest was mean antibiotic treatment duration, which we pooled by random-effects meta-analysis. Meta-regression was performed to examine characteristics influencing antibiotic durations. Results: Sixteen studies (of 3,933 patients) provided sufficient data on antibiotic durations for pooling in meta-analysis. Mean antibiotic durations were highly variable across studies, from 8.4±5.3 to 68.9±30.3 days. The pooled mean treatment duration was 32.7 days (95% CI 24.9 to 40.6 days), but heterogeneity was very high ( I 2 = 100%). In meta-regression, there was a non-significant trend towards decreased mean antibiotic treatment durations over later study years (−1.14 days/study year, 95% CI −2.74, +0.45, p = 0.16). Mean treatment duration was not associated with mean age of participants, percentage of infections caused by Klebsiella spp., percentage of patients with abscesses over 5 cm in diameter, percentage of patients with multiple abscesses, and percentage of patients receiving medical management. No randomized trials have compared treatment durations for pyogenic liver abscess, and no observational studies have reported outcomes according to treatment duration. Conclusions: Among studies reporting on antibiotic durations for pyogenic liver abscess, treatment practices are highly variable. This variability does not seem to be explained by differences in patient, pathogen, abscess, or management characteristics. Future RCTs are needed to guide optimal treatment duration for patients with this complex infection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
化脓性肝脓肿的抗生素治疗时间:系统回顾
背景:我们试图系统地回顾现有的关于化脓性肝脓肿的研究,以确定抗生素治疗持续时间的数据。方法:我们对2000年至2020年的当代医学文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,寻找有关化脓性肝脓肿的研究。主要终点是平均抗生素治疗时间,我们通过随机效应荟萃分析汇总了这些数据。meta回归分析了影响抗生素持续时间的特征。结果:16项研究(3,933例患者)提供了足够的抗生素持续时间数据,用于荟萃分析。各研究的平均抗生素持续时间差异很大,从8.4±5.3天到68.9±30.3天不等。合并平均治疗时间为32.7天(95% CI 24.9 ~ 40.6天),但异质性非常高(i2 = 100%)。在meta回归中,在随后的研究年中,平均抗生素治疗持续时间减少的趋势不显著(- 1.14天/研究年,95% CI - 2.74, +0.45, p = 0.16)。平均治疗时间与参与者的平均年龄、克雷伯氏菌感染的百分比、直径大于5厘米的脓肿患者的百分比、多发脓肿患者的百分比以及接受医疗管理的患者的百分比无关。没有随机试验比较化脓性肝脓肿的治疗时间,也没有观察性研究报告治疗时间的结果。结论:在报告化脓性肝脓肿的抗生素持续时间的研究中,治疗方法变化很大。这种差异似乎不能用患者、病原体、脓肿或治疗特点的差异来解释。需要未来的随机对照试验来指导这种复杂感染患者的最佳治疗时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMMI
JAMMI Medicine-Infectious Diseases
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊最新文献
A case report of Capnocytophaga canimorsus meningitis with failure of ceftriaxone therapy. Impact of climate change on amoeba and the bacteria they host. Shifting the antibiotic rhetoric in children from 'just in case' to 'disclose the risk': Has the time come? Carriage of Haemophilus influenzae serotype A in children: Canadian Immunization Research Network (CIRN) study. Progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy as the presenting feature in a patient with occult low-count monoclonal B-cell lymphocytosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1