Women’s Experiences of Perinatal Anxiety: A Critical Feminist Approach

IF 0.3 Q4 NURSING International Journal of Childbirth Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1891/ijc-2022-0096
Zalia Powell, Nonie Harris, Abraham Francis
{"title":"Women’s Experiences of Perinatal Anxiety: A Critical Feminist Approach","authors":"Zalia Powell, Nonie Harris, Abraham Francis","doi":"10.1891/ijc-2022-0096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: Perinatal anxiety is a prevalent mental health issue with implications for the well-being of women and their children. There is a scarcity of research that considers perinatal anxiety as a standalone mental health issue or explores the lived experiences of women with perinatal anxiety. METHODS: In-depth interviews were carried out with nine mothers who had a lived experience of perinatal anxiety. The women were recruited from South East Queensland, Australia, and were either pregnant and/or parenting a child under the age of five. Data from the interviews were analyzed through a process of thematic analysis to identify key themes in the lived experiences of anxious mothers. Critical feminist theory informed all the aspects of the study. RESULTS: Analysis of the data revealed four key themes: Good Motherhood, Warning Signs, Mental Health Literacy, and Strengths and Support, and seven subthemes: The Birthing Experience, Irritable Infants, Sleep, Breastfeeding, Social Isolation, Barriers to Help Seeking, and Social Roles. Anxiety was found to complicate the experience of motherhood, with the pressure to present as a “good mother” resulting in a reluctance to seek help. Experiences such as birthing, feeding, and sleeping were risk factors for triggering or exacerbating anxiety. Experiences of perinatal anxiety were further complicated by poor mental health literacy and inconsistencies in the care provided by health professionals. Anxious mothers expressed a need for holistic, multidisciplinary mental healthcare, with residential options during times of struggle or crisis. CONCLUSION: Findings reveal the complex context of motherhood and mental illness and identify barriers and opportunities for the multidisciplinary mental healthcare of anxious mothers. A holistic, multidisciplinary response to perinatal anxiety is recommended.","PeriodicalId":43300,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Childbirth","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Childbirth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/ijc-2022-0096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Perinatal anxiety is a prevalent mental health issue with implications for the well-being of women and their children. There is a scarcity of research that considers perinatal anxiety as a standalone mental health issue or explores the lived experiences of women with perinatal anxiety. METHODS: In-depth interviews were carried out with nine mothers who had a lived experience of perinatal anxiety. The women were recruited from South East Queensland, Australia, and were either pregnant and/or parenting a child under the age of five. Data from the interviews were analyzed through a process of thematic analysis to identify key themes in the lived experiences of anxious mothers. Critical feminist theory informed all the aspects of the study. RESULTS: Analysis of the data revealed four key themes: Good Motherhood, Warning Signs, Mental Health Literacy, and Strengths and Support, and seven subthemes: The Birthing Experience, Irritable Infants, Sleep, Breastfeeding, Social Isolation, Barriers to Help Seeking, and Social Roles. Anxiety was found to complicate the experience of motherhood, with the pressure to present as a “good mother” resulting in a reluctance to seek help. Experiences such as birthing, feeding, and sleeping were risk factors for triggering or exacerbating anxiety. Experiences of perinatal anxiety were further complicated by poor mental health literacy and inconsistencies in the care provided by health professionals. Anxious mothers expressed a need for holistic, multidisciplinary mental healthcare, with residential options during times of struggle or crisis. CONCLUSION: Findings reveal the complex context of motherhood and mental illness and identify barriers and opportunities for the multidisciplinary mental healthcare of anxious mothers. A holistic, multidisciplinary response to perinatal anxiety is recommended.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
女性围产期焦虑的经历:一种批判的女性主义方法
目的:围产期焦虑是一种普遍存在的心理健康问题,影响妇女及其子女的健康。很少有研究将围产期焦虑视为一个独立的心理健康问题,也很少有研究探索围产期焦虑妇女的生活经历。方法:对9名有围产期焦虑生活经历的母亲进行深度访谈。这些女性是从澳大利亚昆士兰东南部招募的,她们要么怀孕,要么养育着5岁以下的孩子。访谈数据通过主题分析过程进行分析,以确定焦虑母亲生活经历中的关键主题。批判女性主义理论贯穿于研究的各个方面。结果:对数据的分析揭示了四个关键主题:好母亲、警告信号、心理健康素养、优势和支持,以及七个副主题:分娩经历、婴儿易怒、睡眠、母乳喂养、社会孤立、寻求帮助的障碍和社会角色。研究发现,焦虑使做母亲的经历变得复杂,表现为“好母亲”的压力导致不愿寻求帮助。分娩、喂养和睡眠等经历是触发或加剧焦虑的危险因素。由于心理健康知识贫乏和卫生专业人员提供的护理不一致,围产期焦虑的经历进一步复杂化。焦虑的母亲表示需要全面的、多学科的心理保健,在挣扎或危机时期提供住宿选择。结论:研究结果揭示了母性与精神疾病的复杂背景,并确定了焦虑母亲多学科心理保健的障碍和机会。一个全面的,多学科的反应围产期焦虑推荐。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Risk Factors of Postpartum Depression Among Iranian Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Analyzing the Expectant Management of Redefined Active Phase of Labor (WHO 2018 Guidelines) in Nulliparous Women: A Randomized Control Trial Self-Care and General Well-Being in Postpartum Mothers Maternity Service Professionals’ Perspectives of “the Good, the Bad, and the Possible” in Australian Maternity Services: A Content Analysis Effectiveness of an Individual Counseling Program in Coping With the Fear of Childbirth: A Randomized Controlled Study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1