Comparative Analysis of Edge Soiling Resilience: Full-Cell vs. Half-Cell Photovoltaic Modules in Different Mounting Orientations

IF 1.7 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1155/2023/5572523
Jicheng Zhou, Li Yu, Ayipaiyili Yuetikuer, Linzhao Hao, Bingchun Jiang
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of Edge Soiling Resilience: Full-Cell vs. Half-Cell Photovoltaic Modules in Different Mounting Orientations","authors":"Jicheng Zhou, Li Yu, Ayipaiyili Yuetikuer, Linzhao Hao, Bingchun Jiang","doi":"10.1155/2023/5572523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The performance of distributed PV systems is often hindered by edge soiling, mainly due to the challenges associated with centralized cleaning. In recent years, half-cell modules have gained popularity over conventional full-cell modules due to their potential for improved performance. However, limited research has been conducted to compare the effects of edge soiling on full-cell and half-cell modules, particularly in various mounting orientations. Furthermore, there is a scarcity of methods that integrate simulation and experimentation to analyze the characteristics of shaded PV modules. This study aims to optimize module selection and mounting orientation to mitigate the impact of edge soiling. Simulated models and experimental setups were developed for both full-cell and half-cell modules in both landscape and portrait orientations. The results reveal that the degree of shading correlates with the ratio of shaded substrings within a module. In addition, module performance can be significantly enhanced by altering the mounting orientation. Specifically, the findings demonstrate that half-cell modules outperform full-cell modules when mounted in the portrait orientation. However, in the landscape orientation, the advantage of half-cell modules diminishes. Remarkably, the choice of mounting orientation is found to be contingent on the severity of edge soiling for half-cell modules. This work significantly contributes to the understanding of shading effects in PV systems and offers practical guidance for optimizing distributed PV systems against edge soiling.","PeriodicalId":15716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering","volume":"41 2","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/5572523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of distributed PV systems is often hindered by edge soiling, mainly due to the challenges associated with centralized cleaning. In recent years, half-cell modules have gained popularity over conventional full-cell modules due to their potential for improved performance. However, limited research has been conducted to compare the effects of edge soiling on full-cell and half-cell modules, particularly in various mounting orientations. Furthermore, there is a scarcity of methods that integrate simulation and experimentation to analyze the characteristics of shaded PV modules. This study aims to optimize module selection and mounting orientation to mitigate the impact of edge soiling. Simulated models and experimental setups were developed for both full-cell and half-cell modules in both landscape and portrait orientations. The results reveal that the degree of shading correlates with the ratio of shaded substrings within a module. In addition, module performance can be significantly enhanced by altering the mounting orientation. Specifically, the findings demonstrate that half-cell modules outperform full-cell modules when mounted in the portrait orientation. However, in the landscape orientation, the advantage of half-cell modules diminishes. Remarkably, the choice of mounting orientation is found to be contingent on the severity of edge soiling for half-cell modules. This work significantly contributes to the understanding of shading effects in PV systems and offers practical guidance for optimizing distributed PV systems against edge soiling.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
边缘污染弹性的比较分析:不同安装方向的全电池与半电池光伏组件
分布式光伏系统的性能经常受到边缘污染的阻碍,主要是由于集中清洁带来的挑战。近年来,半电池模块由于其改进性能的潜力而比传统的全电池模块更受欢迎。然而,比较边缘污染对全电池和半电池组件的影响的研究有限,特别是在不同的安装方向上。此外,缺乏将仿真和实验相结合的方法来分析遮阳光伏组件的特性。本研究旨在优化模组的选择和安装方向,以减轻边缘污染的影响。模拟模型和实验设置开发了全电池和半电池模块在风景和肖像方向。结果表明,阴影的程度与模块内阴影子串的比例有关。此外,通过改变安装方向可以显著提高模块的性能。具体来说,研究结果表明,当安装在纵向方向时,半电池模块的性能优于全电池模块。然而,在横向方向上,半电池模块的优势减弱了。值得注意的是,发现安装方向的选择取决于半电池组件的边缘污染的严重程度。这项工作显著有助于理解光伏系统中的遮阳效应,并为优化分布式光伏系统提供实用指导,防止边缘污染。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering
Journal of Engineering ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: Journal of Engineering is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles as well as review articles in several areas of engineering. The subject areas covered by the journal are: - Chemical Engineering - Civil Engineering - Computer Engineering - Electrical Engineering - Industrial Engineering - Mechanical Engineering
期刊最新文献
Study on the Safety Thickness of Three Zones against Fault Water Inrush: Case Study and Model Development Design and Maintenance Optimisation of Substation Automation Systems: A Multiobjectivisation Approach Exploration Effect of Source Type on Pore Structure and Properties of Aerated Geopolymer Concrete Improving Press Bending Production Quality through Finite Element Simulation: Integration CAD and CAE Approach Assessment of Traditional Asphalt Mixture Performance Using Natural Asphalt from Sulfur Springs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1