Heritage, modernity and the Muhajirin in Amman: decolonising urban knowledge in Ras-Al-Ein

IF 2 1区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Heritage Studies Pub Date : 2023-11-02 DOI:10.1080/13527258.2023.2277782
Shatha Abu-Khafajah
{"title":"Heritage, modernity and the <i>Muhajirin</i> in Amman: decolonising urban knowledge in Ras-Al-Ein","authors":"Shatha Abu-Khafajah","doi":"10.1080/13527258.2023.2277782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTAuthoritative urban knowledge (AUK) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is a neocolonial construct firmly rooted in oriental imaginaries and colonial/modern urbanism. It informs the managerial epistemology of neoliberal ‘development’ projects, where urban studies are confined to diagnostic analysis and optimistic calls for local inclusion to counteract state authority and foreign hegemony. This study critically examines the epistemic production of urban spaces at the nexus of heritage, modernity, and migration in the MENA, anchoring the criticism in a case study of urban development in Ras-Al-Ein – also known as the Muhajirin (refugees) neighbourhood – in the historic core of Amman. It then couples ethnographic interviews conducted with the residents of Ras-Al-Ein with decolonial thinking to explore local engagement with urban space as ‘subjugated knowledge’, and to contest the persistence of the AUK. It validates this engagement as local urban knowledge (LUK) and capitalises on the self-critique, irony and resistance depicted in Ras-Al-Ein to argue for a decolonial approach to urban knowledge. It argues that LUK can shift the debate in urban studies from practice analysis to an ethnographic theorisation of urban knowledge. This theorisation is crucial for challenging adverse perceptions of peoples and places and informing development with prudent knowledge.KEYWORDS: Local urban knowledgeauthoritative urban knowledgeknowledge decolonisationurban heritage developmentrefugees AcknowledgementI thank Sondos Hammad and Abdulrahman Al-Debsi for their help in conducting the interviews in 2021. Sarah Elliott, Annalisa Bolin and Lynn Meskell revised the article and provided great advice and immense help. I am grateful for their support. The people of Amman keep welcoming me to their homes and generously sharing their thoughts, memories and worries. Without their generosity and support, this article would not have come to light.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Elsheshtawy (Citation2008) poses the ontological question, ‘Do Arabs still exist? Not in the sense of a physical presence – but rather as a vital and contributing civilization’.2. From the English poet Alfred William Hunt’s 1851 prize poem, Nineveh—‘But aught beyond tradition’s oral tale/Or gleams of truth, like wavering sunlights pale,/The Arab knows not, though around him rise/The sepulchres of earth’s first monarchies’.3. From the English scholar Henry Tristram’s 1882 Palestine travel journal observation on Amman.4. From the English poet, writer, and adventurer Charles Doughty’s 1888 two-volume book, Travels in Arabia Deserta.5. Al-Ahli was the name given to the club by the founder of modern Jordan, Amir Abdullah. Meaning ‘family and relatives’, it replaced the old Circassian name and was intended to indicate the brotherly bond between the people of Amman.Additional informationNotes on contributorsShatha Abu-KhafajahShatha Abu-Khafajah is an associate professor in the Architectural Engineering Department at the Hashemite University in Zarqa, Jordan. She is interested in using the decolonial approach to advance the role of heritage in knowledge production and education. Her research interests include synthesizing architecture, archaeology and anthropology to establish a sustainable approach to heritage management in the Arab region that is community basedand context-oriented.","PeriodicalId":47807,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heritage Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2023.2277782","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTAuthoritative urban knowledge (AUK) in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) is a neocolonial construct firmly rooted in oriental imaginaries and colonial/modern urbanism. It informs the managerial epistemology of neoliberal ‘development’ projects, where urban studies are confined to diagnostic analysis and optimistic calls for local inclusion to counteract state authority and foreign hegemony. This study critically examines the epistemic production of urban spaces at the nexus of heritage, modernity, and migration in the MENA, anchoring the criticism in a case study of urban development in Ras-Al-Ein – also known as the Muhajirin (refugees) neighbourhood – in the historic core of Amman. It then couples ethnographic interviews conducted with the residents of Ras-Al-Ein with decolonial thinking to explore local engagement with urban space as ‘subjugated knowledge’, and to contest the persistence of the AUK. It validates this engagement as local urban knowledge (LUK) and capitalises on the self-critique, irony and resistance depicted in Ras-Al-Ein to argue for a decolonial approach to urban knowledge. It argues that LUK can shift the debate in urban studies from practice analysis to an ethnographic theorisation of urban knowledge. This theorisation is crucial for challenging adverse perceptions of peoples and places and informing development with prudent knowledge.KEYWORDS: Local urban knowledgeauthoritative urban knowledgeknowledge decolonisationurban heritage developmentrefugees AcknowledgementI thank Sondos Hammad and Abdulrahman Al-Debsi for their help in conducting the interviews in 2021. Sarah Elliott, Annalisa Bolin and Lynn Meskell revised the article and provided great advice and immense help. I am grateful for their support. The people of Amman keep welcoming me to their homes and generously sharing their thoughts, memories and worries. Without their generosity and support, this article would not have come to light.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. Elsheshtawy (Citation2008) poses the ontological question, ‘Do Arabs still exist? Not in the sense of a physical presence – but rather as a vital and contributing civilization’.2. From the English poet Alfred William Hunt’s 1851 prize poem, Nineveh—‘But aught beyond tradition’s oral tale/Or gleams of truth, like wavering sunlights pale,/The Arab knows not, though around him rise/The sepulchres of earth’s first monarchies’.3. From the English scholar Henry Tristram’s 1882 Palestine travel journal observation on Amman.4. From the English poet, writer, and adventurer Charles Doughty’s 1888 two-volume book, Travels in Arabia Deserta.5. Al-Ahli was the name given to the club by the founder of modern Jordan, Amir Abdullah. Meaning ‘family and relatives’, it replaced the old Circassian name and was intended to indicate the brotherly bond between the people of Amman.Additional informationNotes on contributorsShatha Abu-KhafajahShatha Abu-Khafajah is an associate professor in the Architectural Engineering Department at the Hashemite University in Zarqa, Jordan. She is interested in using the decolonial approach to advance the role of heritage in knowledge production and education. Her research interests include synthesizing architecture, archaeology and anthropology to establish a sustainable approach to heritage management in the Arab region that is community basedand context-oriented.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
安曼的遗产、现代性和穆哈吉林:拉斯艾因的非殖民化城市知识
【摘要】中东北非地区的权威城市知识(AUK)是一种植根于东方想象和殖民/现代城市主义的新殖民主义建构。它为新自由主义“发展”项目的管理认识论提供了信息,在这些项目中,城市研究仅限于诊断性分析和对地方包容的乐观呼吁,以对抗国家权威和外国霸权。本研究批判性地考察了中东和北非地区遗产、现代性和移民关系下城市空间的认知生产,并以安曼历史核心地带Ras-Al-Ein(也称为Muhajirin(难民)社区)城市发展的案例研究为基础。然后,它将与Ras-Al-Ein居民进行的民族志访谈与非殖民化思维结合起来,探索当地与城市空间的互动,作为“被征服的知识”,并对AUK的持久性提出质疑。它验证了这种作为当地城市知识(LUK)的参与,并利用Ras-Al-Ein中描述的自我批评、讽刺和抵抗来论证一种非殖民化的城市知识方法。它认为LUK可以将城市研究中的争论从实践分析转变为城市知识的民族志理论化。这一理论对于挑战对人民和地方的不利看法以及以审慎的知识为发展提供信息至关重要。关键词:当地城市知识权威城市知识非殖民化城市遗产发展难民致谢感谢Sondos Hammad和Abdulrahman Al-Debsi在2021年帮助我们进行采访。Sarah Elliott, Annalisa Bolin和Lynn Meskell修改了文章,并提供了很好的建议和巨大的帮助。我很感激他们的支持。安曼人民一直欢迎我到他们家里做客,并慷慨地与我分享他们的想法、回忆和忧虑。没有他们的慷慨和支持,这篇文章就不会曝光。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。Elsheshtawy (Citation2008)提出了一个本体论的问题:“阿拉伯人还存在吗?”不是在实际存在的意义上,而是作为一个充满活力和贡献的文明。选自英国诗人阿尔弗雷德·威廉·亨特1851年的获奖诗歌《尼尼微》——“但任何超越传统口述故事的/或真理的闪光,像摇摆的阳光一样苍白,/阿拉伯人不知道,虽然在他周围升起/地球上第一个君主的坟墓。”3 .摘自英国学者亨利·特里斯特拉姆1882年的巴勒斯坦旅行日记对安曼的观察。选自英国诗人、作家和冒险家查尔斯·道蒂1888年的两卷本著作《阿拉伯沙漠游记》。阿赫利是现代约旦的创始人阿米尔·阿卜杜拉给俱乐部起的名字。它的意思是“家庭和亲戚”,取代了古老的切尔克斯名字,意在表明安曼人民之间的兄弟情谊。作者简介:shatha Abu-Khafajah是约旦扎卡哈希姆大学建筑工程系的副教授。她感兴趣的是使用非殖民化的方法来推进遗产在知识生产和教育中的作用。她的研究兴趣包括综合建筑、考古学和人类学,在阿拉伯地区建立一种以社区为基础、以环境为导向的可持续遗产管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Heritage Studies ( IJHS ) is the interdisciplinary academic, refereed journal for scholars and practitioners with a common interest in heritage. The Journal encourages debate over the nature and meaning of heritage as well as its links to memory, identities and place. Articles may include issues emerging from Heritage Studies, Museum Studies, History, Tourism Studies, Sociology, Anthropology, Memory Studies, Cultural Geography, Law, Cultural Studies, and Interpretation and Design.
期刊最新文献
‘The spirit will be here, and hopefully the music too’ perceptions of the future of culture and heritage in the context of climate change on Fanø A multidimensional framework for assessing cultural heritage vulnerability to flood hazards The Australian orphanage museum: heritage and activism Local Australian memory activism and the fast and slow violence of institutional abuse Closing the cell door: where are the Histories of Care-leavers at the old Melbourne Gaol?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1