Space standards in affordable housing in England

IF 3.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Building Research and Information Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/09613218.2023.2253337
Seyithan Özer, Sam Jacoby
{"title":"Space standards in affordable housing in England","authors":"Seyithan Özer, Sam Jacoby","doi":"10.1080/09613218.2023.2253337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines the state of affordable housing in England, with a focus on regional variations in space standards and standardized dwelling layouts widely used by volume housebuilders. Space standards are not statutory and therefore adopted inconsistently across development types or building typologies in England. The study draws on data obtained from planning applications, analysing 153 housing developments and 9876 newly constructed affordable housing units from different regions in England that were completed and marketed in 2021. Based on this, the study compares space standards and their effectiveness as well as the use of standardized unit types.The analysis reveals that apart from London, the most recent Nationally Described Space Standard (2015) is not yet widely used. Instead, Housing Quality Indicators that preceded the new national standards continue to be the norm for houses built outside of London. The findings demonstrate that there is a high level of standardization in affordable housing in terms of dwelling size and layout, with widely used standard house types often determining the design and size of dwellings more than space standards.","PeriodicalId":55316,"journal":{"name":"Building Research and Information","volume":"27 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Building Research and Information","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2023.2253337","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the state of affordable housing in England, with a focus on regional variations in space standards and standardized dwelling layouts widely used by volume housebuilders. Space standards are not statutory and therefore adopted inconsistently across development types or building typologies in England. The study draws on data obtained from planning applications, analysing 153 housing developments and 9876 newly constructed affordable housing units from different regions in England that were completed and marketed in 2021. Based on this, the study compares space standards and their effectiveness as well as the use of standardized unit types.The analysis reveals that apart from London, the most recent Nationally Described Space Standard (2015) is not yet widely used. Instead, Housing Quality Indicators that preceded the new national standards continue to be the norm for houses built outside of London. The findings demonstrate that there is a high level of standardization in affordable housing in terms of dwelling size and layout, with widely used standard house types often determining the design and size of dwellings more than space standards.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国经济适用房的空间标准
本文研究了英国经济适用房的现状,重点关注空间标准和标准化住宅布局的区域差异,这些空间标准和标准化住宅布局被大量房屋建筑商广泛使用。空间标准不是法定的,因此在英国不同的开发类型或建筑类型中采用的空间标准不一致。该研究利用了从规划应用中获得的数据,分析了英国不同地区的153个住房开发项目和9876个新建经济适用房单元,这些住房单元于2021年完工并上市。在此基础上,本研究比较了空间标准及其有效性以及标准化单元类型的使用。分析显示,除伦敦外,最新的国家描述空间标准(2015年)尚未被广泛使用。相反,在新的国家标准之前的住房质量指标仍然是伦敦以外建造的房屋的标准。研究结果表明,在住宅面积和布局方面,经济适用房的标准化程度很高,广泛使用的标准房屋类型往往比空间标准更能决定住宅的设计和大小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Building Research and Information
Building Research and Information 工程技术-结构与建筑技术
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
43
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: BUILDING RESEARCH & INFORMATION (BRI) is a leading international refereed journal focussed on buildings and their supporting systems. Unique to BRI is a focus on a holistic, transdisciplinary approach to buildings and the complexity of issues involving the built environment with other systems over the course of their life: planning, briefing, design, construction, occupation and use, property exchange and evaluation, maintenance, alteration and end of life. Published articles provide conceptual and evidence-based approaches which reflect the complexity and linkages between cultural, environmental, economic, social, organisational, quality of life, health, well-being, design and engineering of the built environment.
期刊最新文献
Exploring the feasibility of mobile robots for post-occupancy evaluations Indoor environmental evaluation of traditional Chinese medicine clinic – taking the treatment space as an example Towards circular renovation: a comparative review of circular economy integration in sustainable building rating systems Perceptions of volume home builders and the transition to net zero emissions housing in Australia The impact of light adjustment versus tuneable white mode on ICU staff’s circadian rhythms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1