Analysis of in situ measurements of electron, ion and neutral temperatures in the lower thermosphere–ionosphere

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS Annales Geophysicae Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.5194/angeo-41-339-2023
Panagiotis Pirnaris, Theodoros Sarris
{"title":"Analysis of in situ measurements of electron, ion and neutral temperatures in the lower thermosphere–ionosphere","authors":"Panagiotis Pirnaris, Theodoros Sarris","doi":"10.5194/angeo-41-339-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Simultaneous knowledge of the temperatures of electrons, ions and neutrals is key to the understanding and quantification of energy transfer processes in planetary atmospheres. However, whereas electron and ion temperature measurements are routinely obtained from ground-based incoherent scatter radars, simultaneous measurements of electron, ion and neutral temperature measurements can only be made in situ. For the Earth's lower thermosphere–ionosphere, the only available comprehensive in situ dataset of electron, ion and neutral temperatures to date is that of the Atmosphere Explorers C, D and E and the Dynamics Explorer 2 missions. In this study we first perform a cross-comparison of all co-temporal and co-spatial measurements between in situ electron and ion temperature measurements from the above in situ spacecraft missions with corresponding measurements from the Arecibo, Millstone Hill and Saint-Santin incoherent scatter radars, during times of overflights of these spacecraft over the radar fields of view. This expands upon a previous study that only considered data from the Atmosphere Explorer C. The results indicate good agreement between satellite and ground-based radar measurements. Subsequently, out of the above datasets, all instances where ion temperatures appear to be lower than neutral temperatures are identified and are studied statistically. Whereas current understanding indicates that ion temperatures are generally expected to be higher than neutral temperatures in the lower thermosphere–ionosphere, a non-negligible number of events is found where this does not hold true. The distribution of all such cases in altitude, latitude and longitude is presented and discussed. Potential causes leading to neutral temperatures being higher than ion temperatures are outlined, including both instrumental effects or measurement errors and physical causes. Whereas a conclusive case cannot be made based on the present analysis, it is speculated from the results presented herein that not all cases can be attributed to instrument effects or measurement errors. This can have significant implications for the current understanding that the energy of the ions is expected to be higher than that of the neutrals and points to the need for additional simultaneous in situ measurements in the lower thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI).","PeriodicalId":50777,"journal":{"name":"Annales Geophysicae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales Geophysicae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-41-339-2023","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract. Simultaneous knowledge of the temperatures of electrons, ions and neutrals is key to the understanding and quantification of energy transfer processes in planetary atmospheres. However, whereas electron and ion temperature measurements are routinely obtained from ground-based incoherent scatter radars, simultaneous measurements of electron, ion and neutral temperature measurements can only be made in situ. For the Earth's lower thermosphere–ionosphere, the only available comprehensive in situ dataset of electron, ion and neutral temperatures to date is that of the Atmosphere Explorers C, D and E and the Dynamics Explorer 2 missions. In this study we first perform a cross-comparison of all co-temporal and co-spatial measurements between in situ electron and ion temperature measurements from the above in situ spacecraft missions with corresponding measurements from the Arecibo, Millstone Hill and Saint-Santin incoherent scatter radars, during times of overflights of these spacecraft over the radar fields of view. This expands upon a previous study that only considered data from the Atmosphere Explorer C. The results indicate good agreement between satellite and ground-based radar measurements. Subsequently, out of the above datasets, all instances where ion temperatures appear to be lower than neutral temperatures are identified and are studied statistically. Whereas current understanding indicates that ion temperatures are generally expected to be higher than neutral temperatures in the lower thermosphere–ionosphere, a non-negligible number of events is found where this does not hold true. The distribution of all such cases in altitude, latitude and longitude is presented and discussed. Potential causes leading to neutral temperatures being higher than ion temperatures are outlined, including both instrumental effects or measurement errors and physical causes. Whereas a conclusive case cannot be made based on the present analysis, it is speculated from the results presented herein that not all cases can be attributed to instrument effects or measurement errors. This can have significant implications for the current understanding that the energy of the ions is expected to be higher than that of the neutrals and points to the need for additional simultaneous in situ measurements in the lower thermosphere–ionosphere (LTI).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下热层-电离层中电子、离子和中性温度的原位测量分析
摘要同时了解电子、离子和中性的温度是理解和量化行星大气中能量传递过程的关键。然而,电子和离子温度测量通常是通过地面非相干散射雷达获得的,而电子、离子和中性温度测量的同时测量只能在现场进行。对于地球较低的热层-电离层,迄今为止唯一可用的电子、离子和中性温度的综合原位数据集是大气探测器C、D和E以及动力探测器2任务的数据集。在本研究中,我们首先对上述航天器原位任务的原位电子和离子温度测量结果与阿雷西博、米尔斯顿山和圣桑丁非相干散射雷达在这些航天器飞越雷达视场时的相应测量结果进行了所有共时共空交叉比较。这项研究扩展了先前的研究,该研究只考虑了大气探测器c的数据。结果表明,卫星和地面雷达测量结果之间的一致性很好。随后,在上述数据集中,所有离子温度似乎低于中性温度的情况都被确定并进行统计研究。尽管目前的理解表明,在较低的热层-电离层中,离子温度通常预计会高于中性温度,但在一些不可忽略的事件中,这种情况并不成立。提出并讨论了所有这些情况在海拔、纬度和经度上的分布。概述了导致中性温度高于离子温度的潜在原因,包括仪器效应或测量误差和物理原因。虽然不能根据目前的分析得出一个结论性的案例,但从本文提出的结果可以推测,并非所有的案例都可以归因于仪器效应或测量误差。这可能对目前的理解产生重大影响,即离子的能量预计将高于中性离子的能量,并指出需要在较低的热层-电离层(LTI)中进行额外的同步原位测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annales Geophysicae
Annales Geophysicae 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Annales Geophysicae (ANGEO) is a not-for-profit international multi- and inter-disciplinary scientific open-access journal in the field of solar–terrestrial and planetary sciences. ANGEO publishes original articles and short communications (letters) on research of the Sun–Earth system, including the science of space weather, solar–terrestrial plasma physics, the Earth''s ionosphere and atmosphere, the magnetosphere, and the study of planets and planetary systems, the interaction between the different spheres of a planet, and the interaction across the planetary system. Topics range from space weathering, planetary magnetic field, and planetary interior and surface dynamics to the formation and evolution of planetary systems.
期刊最新文献
Ionospheric upwelling and the level of associated noise at solar minimum Sensitivity analysis of a Martian atmospheric column model with data from the Mars Science Laboratory Low-frequency solar radio type II bursts and their association with space weather events during the ascending phase of solar cycle 25 The investigation of June 21 and 25, 2015 CMEs using EUHFORIA Observations of ionospheric disturbances associated with the 2020 Beirut explosion by Defense Meteorological Satellite Program and ground-based ionosondes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1