Pengaruh Teknik Kontrak Perilaku terhadap Perilaku Menyontek Siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Luhak Nan Duo Kabupaten Pasaman Barat

YASIN Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.58578/yasin.v3i6.1790
Putri Rahmadayani, Fadhilla Yusri
{"title":"Pengaruh Teknik Kontrak Perilaku terhadap Perilaku Menyontek Siswa di SMP Negeri 1 Luhak Nan Duo Kabupaten Pasaman Barat","authors":"Putri Rahmadayani, Fadhilla Yusri","doi":"10.58578/yasin.v3i6.1790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cheating behavior is any act or trick that is dishonest, dishonest behavior and cheating carried out by someone to achieve success. This research was motivated by the existence of several students who were indicated to have cheated during exams or learning evaluations. The aim of the research is to determine the effect of behavioral contracts in individual counseling to overcome students' cheating behavior at SMPN 1 Luhak Nan Duo, West Pasaman Regency. This research is classified as Pre-Experimental research using the One Group Pretest Posttest Design model. The population was 38 students in class VIII at SMPN 1 Luhak Nan Duo, West Pasaman Regency, while the research sample was students who were indicated to have cheated, taken based on purposive sampling techniques and pretest results, totaling 5 people. The data collection instrument is a Likert scale. Data analysis techniques for non-parametric statistical tests, the Wilcoxon signed rank test method, with the help of (SPSS) version 24.00. From the calculation of the scale score results, the results of students' cheating behavior before treatment (pretest) obtained a mean of 79.00, this is classified as medium criteria. Meanwhile, after treatment (posttest), the mean was 65.80, which is classified as low criteria. The calculation results show the difference between the pretest score and the posttest score. This statement is based on a Zcount value of 2.023, while a Ztable with a degree of freedom (df) of 4 is obtained at 1.96 at a significance level of 0.05. So it can be seen that the value of Zcount> Ztabel is 2.023 > 1.96, so there is a difference in the average test score between before treatment was given to students who committed acts of cheating and after treatment was given to students who committed acts of cheating so that Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted.","PeriodicalId":481460,"journal":{"name":"YASIN","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YASIN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58578/yasin.v3i6.1790","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cheating behavior is any act or trick that is dishonest, dishonest behavior and cheating carried out by someone to achieve success. This research was motivated by the existence of several students who were indicated to have cheated during exams or learning evaluations. The aim of the research is to determine the effect of behavioral contracts in individual counseling to overcome students' cheating behavior at SMPN 1 Luhak Nan Duo, West Pasaman Regency. This research is classified as Pre-Experimental research using the One Group Pretest Posttest Design model. The population was 38 students in class VIII at SMPN 1 Luhak Nan Duo, West Pasaman Regency, while the research sample was students who were indicated to have cheated, taken based on purposive sampling techniques and pretest results, totaling 5 people. The data collection instrument is a Likert scale. Data analysis techniques for non-parametric statistical tests, the Wilcoxon signed rank test method, with the help of (SPSS) version 24.00. From the calculation of the scale score results, the results of students' cheating behavior before treatment (pretest) obtained a mean of 79.00, this is classified as medium criteria. Meanwhile, after treatment (posttest), the mean was 65.80, which is classified as low criteria. The calculation results show the difference between the pretest score and the posttest score. This statement is based on a Zcount value of 2.023, while a Ztable with a degree of freedom (df) of 4 is obtained at 1.96 at a significance level of 0.05. So it can be seen that the value of Zcount> Ztabel is 2.023 > 1.96, so there is a difference in the average test score between before treatment was given to students who committed acts of cheating and after treatment was given to students who committed acts of cheating so that Ho was rejected and H1 was accepted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
行为合同技术对西萨满地区的学生作弊行为的影响
欺骗行为是指某人为取得成功而进行的不诚实、不诚实的行为和欺骗的任何行为或诡计。这项研究的动机是,有几名学生被指在考试或学习评估中作弊。本研究的目的是确定行为契约在个体辅导中克服学生作弊行为的效果。本研究采用一组前测后测设计模型,被归类为前实验研究。总体为西帕萨曼县SMPN 1 Luhak Nan Duo八年级38名学生,而研究样本为根据有目的抽样技术和预测结果确定的作弊学生,共5人。数据收集工具为李克特量表。数据分析技术为非参数统计检验,采用Wilcoxon符号秩检验方法,借助于(SPSS) 24.00版。从量表评分结果的计算来看,学生在治疗前(前测)的作弊行为结果均值为79.00,属于中等标准。同时,治疗后(后测)的平均值为65.80,属于低标准。计算结果显示了前测分数与后测分数的差异。此语句基于Zcount值为2.023,而在显著性水平为0.05的情况下,在1.96下得到自由度为4的Ztable。由此可见,Zcount>Ztabel为2.023 >1.96,因此对作弊行为的学生进行治疗前的平均考试成绩与对作弊行为的学生进行治疗后的平均考试成绩存在差异,因此拒绝了Ho,接受了H1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prestasi Akademik dan Perilaku Komunikasi Remaja Pengguna Game Online Free Fire (Studi Kasus di Desa Hijrah, Kecamatan Lape) Analisis Pengaruh Iklan Judi Slot Online pada Situs Tokyo99 terhadap Masyarakat Kabupaten Sumbawa Analisis Hambatan Komunikasi Lintas Budaya pada Mahasiswa Suku Mbojo dan Suku Samawa di Universitas Teknologi Sumbawa Strategi Pengembangan Seni Kriya Gerabah: Analisis Triple Helix di Desa Wonorejo Pekalongan Prospek Pengembangan Agroindustri Budidaya Tanaman Porang untuk Kesejahteraan Ekonomi Keluarga Petani Porang pada Kec. Kualuh Kab. Labuhan Batu Utara
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1