Application of AI-Helped Image Classification of Fish Images: An iDigBio dataset example

Bahadir Altintas, Yasin Bakış, Xiojun Wang, Henry Bart
{"title":"Application of AI-Helped Image Classification of Fish Images: An iDigBio dataset example","authors":"Bahadir Altintas, Yasin Bakış, Xiojun Wang, Henry Bart","doi":"10.3897/biss.7.112438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in data science as well as in areas of computational science. Commonly used classification methods in AI can also be used for unorganized databases, if a proper model is trained. Most of the classification work is done on image data for purposes such as object detection and face recognition. If an object is well detected from an image, the classification may be done to organize image data. In this work, we try to identify images from an Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio) dataset and to classify these images to generate metadata to use as an AI-ready dataset in the future. The main problem of the museum image datasets is the lack of metadata information on images, wrong categorization, or poor image quality. By using AI, it maybe possible to overcome these problems. Automatic tools can help find, eliminate or fix these problems. For our example, we trained a model for 10 classes (e.g., complete fish, photograph, notes/labels, X-ray, CT (computerized tomotography) scan, partial fish, fossil, skeleton) by using a manually tagged iDigBio image dataset. After training a model for each for class, we reclassified the dataset by using these trained models. Some of the results are given in Table 1. As can be seen in the table, even manually classified images can be identified as different classes, and some classes are very similar to each other visually such as CT scans and X-rays or fossils and skeletons. Those kind of similarities are very confusing for the human eye as well as AI results.","PeriodicalId":9011,"journal":{"name":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biodiversity Information Science and Standards","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/biss.7.112438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) becomes more prevalent in data science as well as in areas of computational science. Commonly used classification methods in AI can also be used for unorganized databases, if a proper model is trained. Most of the classification work is done on image data for purposes such as object detection and face recognition. If an object is well detected from an image, the classification may be done to organize image data. In this work, we try to identify images from an Integrated Digitized Biocollections (iDigBio) dataset and to classify these images to generate metadata to use as an AI-ready dataset in the future. The main problem of the museum image datasets is the lack of metadata information on images, wrong categorization, or poor image quality. By using AI, it maybe possible to overcome these problems. Automatic tools can help find, eliminate or fix these problems. For our example, we trained a model for 10 classes (e.g., complete fish, photograph, notes/labels, X-ray, CT (computerized tomotography) scan, partial fish, fossil, skeleton) by using a manually tagged iDigBio image dataset. After training a model for each for class, we reclassified the dataset by using these trained models. Some of the results are given in Table 1. As can be seen in the table, even manually classified images can be identified as different classes, and some classes are very similar to each other visually such as CT scans and X-rays or fossils and skeletons. Those kind of similarities are very confusing for the human eye as well as AI results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
人工智能在鱼类图像分类中的应用——以iDigBio数据集为例
人工智能(AI)在数据科学和计算科学领域变得越来越普遍。如果训练了合适的模型,人工智能中常用的分类方法也可以用于无组织的数据库。大多数分类工作都是在图像数据上完成的,用于目标检测和人脸识别等目的。如果从图像中很好地检测到目标,则可以进行分类以组织图像数据。在这项工作中,我们尝试从集成数字化生物收集(iDigBio)数据集中识别图像,并对这些图像进行分类,以生成元数据,以便将来用作ai就绪的数据集。博物馆图像数据集的主要问题是缺乏图像元数据信息、分类错误或图像质量差。通过使用人工智能,有可能克服这些问题。自动工具可以帮助发现、消除或修复这些问题。对于我们的示例,我们通过使用手动标记的iDigBio图像数据集训练了10个类别(例如,完整的鱼、照片、注释/标签、x射线、CT(计算机断层扫描)扫描、部分鱼、化石、骨骼)的模型。在为每个类别训练一个模型之后,我们使用这些训练好的模型对数据集进行重新分类。表1给出了一些结果。从表中可以看出,即使是人工分类的图像也可以被识别为不同的类别,并且有些类别在视觉上非常相似,例如CT扫描和x射线或化石和骨骼。对于人类的眼睛和人工智能的结果来说,这种相似性是非常令人困惑的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meeting Report for the Phenoscape TraitFest 2023 with Comments on Organising Interdisciplinary Meetings Implementation Experience Report for the Developing Latimer Core Standard: The DiSSCo Flanders use-case Structuring Information from Plant Morphological Descriptions using Open Information Extraction The Future of Natural History Transcription: Navigating AI advancements with VoucherVision and the Specimen Label Transcription Project (SLTP) Comparative Study: Evaluating the effects of class balancing on transformer performance in the PlantNet-300k image dataset
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1