The Origins of Collaborative Governance in South Korea: An Analysis of the First Ten Years After Democratisation

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q1 AREA STUDIES Journal of Contemporary Asia Pub Date : 2023-09-11 DOI:10.1080/00472336.2023.2248602
Sunhyuk Kim, Chonghee Han
{"title":"The Origins of Collaborative Governance in South Korea: An Analysis of the First Ten Years After Democratisation","authors":"Sunhyuk Kim, Chonghee Han","doi":"10.1080/00472336.2023.2248602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractAbstractSouth Korea’s transition to democracy in 1987 was driven by social movements. The grand democracy coalition included the opposition party and various civic associations, including student groups, labour unions, and religious organisations. Civil society continued to pressure the post-transitional governments to dismantle authoritarian structures and remove undemocratic practices. Political authoritarianism in South Korea in 1961–1987 was inseparable from the developmental state that delivered the country’s impressive economic development. Government reform after the democratisation entailed the weakening, if not dismantling, of the developmental state, to make public governance and policymaking more transparent, responsive, and participatory. In this paper we examine government reform in South Korea, focusing on the first ten years following democratisation. The Roh Tae Woo government created the Administrative Reform Committee in 1988, and the Kim Young Sam government launched the Presidential Commission for Administrative Reform in 1993. Although both agencies engaged civilians in the reform process, it was the Ministry of Government Administration and the Ministry of Finance and Economy that dominated the designing and implementing of the reforms, which demonstrates that the introduction and implementation of collaborative governance in South Korea was state led. Comparative implications are drawn from the South Korean case.Key Words: collaborative governancedemocratisationdevelopmental stateGovernment reformSouth Korea Conflicts of InterestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.Additional informationFundingThe authors did not receive support from any organisation for this article.","PeriodicalId":47420,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2023.2248602","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AREA STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractAbstractSouth Korea’s transition to democracy in 1987 was driven by social movements. The grand democracy coalition included the opposition party and various civic associations, including student groups, labour unions, and religious organisations. Civil society continued to pressure the post-transitional governments to dismantle authoritarian structures and remove undemocratic practices. Political authoritarianism in South Korea in 1961–1987 was inseparable from the developmental state that delivered the country’s impressive economic development. Government reform after the democratisation entailed the weakening, if not dismantling, of the developmental state, to make public governance and policymaking more transparent, responsive, and participatory. In this paper we examine government reform in South Korea, focusing on the first ten years following democratisation. The Roh Tae Woo government created the Administrative Reform Committee in 1988, and the Kim Young Sam government launched the Presidential Commission for Administrative Reform in 1993. Although both agencies engaged civilians in the reform process, it was the Ministry of Government Administration and the Ministry of Finance and Economy that dominated the designing and implementing of the reforms, which demonstrates that the introduction and implementation of collaborative governance in South Korea was state led. Comparative implications are drawn from the South Korean case.Key Words: collaborative governancedemocratisationdevelopmental stateGovernment reformSouth Korea Conflicts of InterestThe authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.Additional informationFundingThe authors did not receive support from any organisation for this article.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
韩国协同治理的起源:民主化后的头十年分析
【摘要】1987年韩国的民主转型是由社会运动推动的。大民主联合由在野党和学生团体、工会、宗教团体等市民团体组成。民间社会继续向过渡后的政府施加压力,要求它们拆除专制结构并消除不民主的做法。韩国在1961年至1987年间的政治威权主义与实现了令人印象深刻的经济发展的发展型国家是分不开的。民主化后的政府改革需要削弱(如果不是瓦解的话)发展中的国家,以使公共治理和政策制定更加透明、反应更灵敏、参与性更强。在本文中,我们考察了韩国的政府改革,重点关注民主化后的头十年。1988年卢泰愚政府设立了行政改革委员会,1993年金泳三政府设立了总统行政改革推进委员会。虽然这两个机构在改革过程中都有文职人员参与,但政府行政部和财政经济部主导了改革的设计和实施,这表明韩国合作治理的引入和实施是由国家主导的。从韩国的案例中得出了比较意义。关键词:协同治理;民主化;发展型国家;政府改革;韩国利益冲突;本文作者未获得任何组织的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
9.10%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: The Journal of Contemporary Asia is an established refereed publication, it appears quarterly and has done so since 1970. When the journal was established, it was conceived as providing an alternative to mainstream perspectives on contemporary Asian issues. The journal maintains this tradition and seeks to publish articles that deal with the broad problems of economic, political and social development of Asia. Articles on economic development issues, political economy, agriculture, planning, the working class, people"s movements, politics and power, imperialism and empire, international financial institutions, the environment, and economic history are especially welcomed.
期刊最新文献
Digital and Green Transitions and Automotive Industry Reconfiguration: Evidence From Japan and China “Risk is not Measured, but Contested and Compromised”: A Case Study of Jakarta–Bandung High-Speed Railway Instrumentalism or Commitment to Social Justice? Shifting Inter-Ethnic Solidarities in Post-Coup Myanmar Introduction: Revolution and Solidarity in Myanmar A New Regime of Dispossession in Neo-Liberal India? Wind Energy, Hindutva, and Land Politics in Western Gujarat
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1