Philipp Müller, Christian Hermanrud, Haakon Fossen
{"title":"A new approach to investigate the effect of burial depth and clay content on fault permeabilities applied at the Njord Field","authors":"Philipp Müller, Christian Hermanrud, Haakon Fossen","doi":"10.1144/petgeo2023-025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fault permeability prediction typically relies on empirical relationships between permeability and clay content or burial depth. Calibration of such methods relies on either core data or subsurface observations of fluid pressure and hydrocarbon contact offsets across faults. Published core data suggest that no relationships exist between host rock clay content and fault permeability for phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks, whereas published subsurface calibration data suggest otherwise. We here present a new method for calibration of fault rock permeabilities to subsurface pressure data. This approach is an analogue from electrical engineering to compute fault permeabilities across all major faults in a study area and optimise depth and clay content dependence of fault permeabilities. We tested this method at the Jurassic section of the Norwegian Njord Field area, where faults span the depth range of 2.7- 4.5 km and the lowest clay content in individual faults varies between 8.9 to 25.7%. The flow-restricting faults at Njord are phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks. Our modelling shows that fault rock permeability decreases with burial depth, whereas the clay content has nearly no impact. Sensitivity analyses show that these results are robust. Therefore, SGR-based algorithms for fault seal prediction cannot be expected to give good fault permeability predictions for seismic-scale faults at Njord.\n \n Thematic collection:\n This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at:\n https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022\n \n \n Supplementary material:\n https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6824325","PeriodicalId":49704,"journal":{"name":"Petroleum Geoscience","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Petroleum Geoscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1144/petgeo2023-025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Fault permeability prediction typically relies on empirical relationships between permeability and clay content or burial depth. Calibration of such methods relies on either core data or subsurface observations of fluid pressure and hydrocarbon contact offsets across faults. Published core data suggest that no relationships exist between host rock clay content and fault permeability for phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks, whereas published subsurface calibration data suggest otherwise. We here present a new method for calibration of fault rock permeabilities to subsurface pressure data. This approach is an analogue from electrical engineering to compute fault permeabilities across all major faults in a study area and optimise depth and clay content dependence of fault permeabilities. We tested this method at the Jurassic section of the Norwegian Njord Field area, where faults span the depth range of 2.7- 4.5 km and the lowest clay content in individual faults varies between 8.9 to 25.7%. The flow-restricting faults at Njord are phyllosilicate-framework fault rocks. Our modelling shows that fault rock permeability decreases with burial depth, whereas the clay content has nearly no impact. Sensitivity analyses show that these results are robust. Therefore, SGR-based algorithms for fault seal prediction cannot be expected to give good fault permeability predictions for seismic-scale faults at Njord.
Thematic collection:
This article is part of the Fault and top seals 2022 collection available at:
https://www.lyellcollection.org/topic/collections/fault-and-top-seals-2022
Supplementary material:
https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6824325
期刊介绍:
Petroleum Geoscience is the international journal of geoenergy and applied earth science, and is co-owned by the Geological Society of London and the European Association of Geoscientists and Engineers (EAGE).
Petroleum Geoscience transcends disciplinary boundaries and publishes a balanced mix of articles covering exploration, exploitation, appraisal, development and enhancement of sub-surface hydrocarbon resources and carbon repositories. The integration of disciplines in an applied context, whether for fluid production, carbon storage or related geoenergy applications, is a particular strength of the journal. Articles on enhancing exploration efficiency, lowering technological and environmental risk, and improving hydrocarbon recovery communicate the latest developments in sub-surface geoscience to a wide readership.
Petroleum Geoscience provides a multidisciplinary forum for those engaged in the science and technology of the rock-related sub-surface disciplines. The journal reaches some 8000 individual subscribers, and a further 1100 institutional subscriptions provide global access to readers including geologists, geophysicists, petroleum and reservoir engineers, petrophysicists and geochemists in both academia and industry. The journal aims to share knowledge of reservoir geoscience and to reflect the international nature of its development.